Newswire

Zelensky says more than 150 Chinese mercenaries are fighting for Russia in Ukraine

Newswire / /

On Wednesday, Ukraine expanded its earlier claims regarding Chinese nationals fighting for Russia in its ongoing invasion, stating that it has collected comprehensive intelligence on over 150 mercenaries allegedly recruited by Moscow through social media platforms. In response, Chinese authorities dismissed the allegations as “totally unfounded.”

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed on Tuesday that the country’s armed forces had captured two Chinese individuals fighting alongside Russian troops on Ukrainian territory. It marked the first official statement by Ukraine regarding Chinese fighters taking part in the war.

Zelensky also indicated that Kyiv is open to negotiating a prisoner exchange, proposing to trade the two captured individuals for Ukrainian soldiers currently held by Russia.

Although he did not present concrete proof, Zelensky claimed that Chinese officials were aware of Russia’s efforts to enlist Chinese mercenaries. However, he stopped short of accusing the Chinese government of officially endorsing their involvement in the conflict.

According to Zelensky, Ukraine possesses the surnames and passport details of 155 Chinese nationals serving in the Russian military, adding that “we believe that there are many more of them.”

He reportedly shared documents with journalists that include names, passport information, and other personal details of the alleged Chinese fighters—such as their arrival dates in Russia for training and subsequent deployments. The Associated Press has not independently confirmed the authenticity of these documents.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, China has offered consistent diplomatic backing to Moscow. According to Western officials, Beijing has also supplied Russia with machinery and microelectronics potentially used in weapon manufacturing, in addition to bolstering Russia’s economy through energy and consumer goods trade.

Zelensky said that U.S. officials reacted with “surprise” upon learning about the alleged presence of Chinese fighters in Ukraine.

During a press briefing in Washington on Tuesday, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce described the reports of Chinese nationals fighting for Russia as “disturbing.”

“China is a major enabler of Russia in the war in Ukraine,” Bruce stated. She asserted that China supplies “nearly 80 per cent of the dual-use items Russia needs to sustain the war.”

Zelensky says more than 150 Chinese mercenaries are fighting for Russia in Ukraine Read More »

Beijing Intensifies Recruitment of Former U.S. Officials

Newswire / /

The U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) has issued a formal warning that Chinese intelligence agencies are covertly attempting to recruit American citizens with access to sensitive government information.

According to the statement, Beijing is using increasingly sophisticated and deceptive methods to achieve its intelligence objectives. These recruitment efforts are often disguised as attractive career opportunities. The NCSC highlights that fake LinkedIn profiles and bogus invitations to conferences, or “advisory boards,” are commonly used to lure both former and current U.S. government employees—particularly during a time of mass layoffs and structural reforms within the federal workforce.

These developments come in the context of a major restructuring initiative led by the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk. The department’s push to streamline bureaucracy has resulted in a sudden influx of unemployed federal employees, many of whom possess experience in sensitive areas such as national security, defense procurement, and foreign policy—making them prime targets for foreign intelligence recruitment.

Earlier investigative reporting by Reuters uncovered a shadowy network of companies allegedly tied to a secretive Chinese technology conglomerate. These firms, operating through shell entities in Southeast Asia and the Middle East, have been linked to efforts aimed at contacting recently laid-off U.S. federal workers.

While the full extent of China’s recruitment campaign remains unclear, officials have described it as part of a broader push to expand Beijing’s human intelligence (HUMINT) operations within the United States. Authorities have observed a “sharp increase in recruitment efforts” originating from Chinese actors.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) are actively conducting counterintelligence operations to detect and disrupt these threats. Historically, Chinese officials have denied all allegations of espionage and interference, dismissing them as “politically motivated” and a product of “anti-China hysteria.”

As tensions between Washington and Beijing continue to simmer, the latest warning underscores the intensifying contest over intelligence and national security, on which the Chinese Embassy in Washington has not issued a comment on the latest claims.

Beijing Intensifies Recruitment of Former U.S. Officials Read More »

Tariff War: Trump Threatens China With Additional 50% Tariffs

Newswire / /

Donald Trump has threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on China if it does not reverse last week’s decision to impose an additional 34% tariff on American goods by April 8. In total, the tax on Chinese goods imported into the United States will increase by 104%.

As a representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on April 7, this is bullying by the United States towards China, and threats and pressure are not the right way to deal with China. He called the tariffs „unilateral, economic bullying and protectionism“. At a press conference, he noted that the US tariffs in the name of reciprocity only serve its own interests at the expense of other countries.

“The abuse of tariffs by states deprives countries in the global south of their right to development,” Lin said, citing the widening gap between the rich and the poor in each country, especially in less developed countries.

Lin called on other states to stand together against unilateralism and protectionism, and to uphold the international and multilateral trading system in line with the values ​​of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization.

China refuses to bow to US “blackmail.” The commerce minister said that the US threat to escalate trade with China is a big mistake and, in addition, once again reveals the US’s blackmailing nature. “If the US does not change its course, China will continue to fight to the end,” Wang Wentao said.

In spite of this, Chinese Vice Commerce Minister Ling Ji assured American companies, including Tesla and GE Healthcare, that the country will always protect foreign-funded companies operating in China, including American companies.

“China has been, is, and will be an ‘ideal, safe and promising investment destination for foreign investors,’” Ling said at a meeting in Beijing on Sunday attended by more than 20 U.S.-funded companies. Ling said Beijing will not hold American companies accountable as President Trump escalates his tariff war with the rest of the world, including China.

At a meeting of the World Trade Organization on April 9, China plans to raise the United States’ retaliatory tariffs as a “new trade concern.” China has already filed a formal complaint with the Geneva-based watchdog.

Tariff War: Trump Threatens China With Additional 50% Tariffs Read More »

Georgian Dream’s New “Grant Law”, A.K.A Repression on Steroids!

Newswire / /

Welcome to Turkmenistan-on-the-Black-Sea. Yesterday (April 7), Georgian Dream introduced another chapter in its authoritarian playbook — a blitzkrieg-style amendment to the Law on Grants that makes so-called “Russian Law” look like amateur hour. If passed (and they’re fast-tracking it to do precisely that by next week), this law will give the government extensive power to decide who may & may not receive foreign grants — and to punish anyone who doesn’t toe the line with crushing financial and legal consequences.

In other words: civil society, media, watchdogs — you’re either silent, sanctioned, or seized.

Want to receive a grant — better ask the government first

Any organization or individual wanting to receive a foreign grant must submit their draft agreement to the Government of Georgia (or its chosen henchmen). The government then has 10 days to say “yes” or “no.” If they say no — tough luck. You can try to appeal, but the rejection takes effect immediately and won’t wait around for your court case.

Who is exempt — and who is clearly targeted

Grants for international sports, scholarships for studies/science outside Georgia, and grants received directly by international organizations in Georgia are exempt. Everyone else — CSOs, media, watchdogs, community groups — fall under strict scrutiny.

The Anti-Corruption Bureau becomes a surveillance agency in all but name

Under this bill, the Anti-Corruption Bureau — led by Razhden Kuprashvili — is granted sweeping new powers to investigate and punish so-called “prohibited grants.” Think less watchdog, more intelligence agency. Here’s what it can now do:

  • Demand financial documents from individuals or organizations, even if there’s just a vague suspicion of a problematic grant.
  • Summon private citizens for questioning, including formal interrogations before a magistrate judge.
  • Request highly sensitive personal data, including banking information and non-public communications — with court approval that must be processed in under 48 hours.
  • Record interrogations with audio and video, including remote questioning via electronic platforms. 
  • Fine individuals for giving “false” information, even under voluntary questioning, while claiming the interrogation is not coercive.

In short: under the pretext of anti-corruption, this Bureau can now act like a law enforcement agency, a financial regulator, and an intelligence service — all rolled into one, with minimal checks and lightning-fast timelines.

Seizing your bank account — fast and without delay

If the Bureau thinks you might not pay the fine, they can freeze your bank accounts or seize your assets on the spot. They’ll ask the court for confirmation — which must come within 48 hours — but their decision is already in effect. You can appeal once. It won’t help. The appeal won’t suspend the seizure, and the court’s word is final.

Penalties designed to punish, intimidate, and repeat

  • If you receive a “prohibited grant”: fined double the grant amount
  • If you “lie” during questioning: fined 2,000 GEL
  • Do it again? The fine doubles
  • Offenses can be punished up to 6 years later
  • During elections, courts are forced to rule on these cases within 5 days — again, with final decisions that can’t be appealed

Let’s not forget: just one day before launching this legislative assault, Georgian Dream’s Speaker of Parliament, Shalva Papuashvili, accused the UK government of “interfering” in Georgia’s internal affairs — all because they dared to fund voter education and election observation efforts. According to Papuashvili, a British grant program supporting free and fair elections was part of a grand conspiracy to “change governments and destabilize countries.” He even called the grant “corrupt,” claiming everyone already knows it’ll go to organizations like ISFED. That paranoid outburst wasn’t a coincidence — it was the prelude. The next day, the regime gave itself the legal tools to crush exactly these kinds of programs.

This is political warfare — and we are not leaving the field

This bill isn’t about transparency. It’s about the extermination of dissent. It’s about silencing media, paralyzing civil society, and building a Turkmen-style system in a country that claims to be “European.”

It’s about pushing international donors out of political life — a direct attack on democracy-supporting assistance, at a time when elections are approaching.
It’s about scaring people into inaction.
But here’s what it’s not going to do: erase us.
We will not disappear. We are not afraid.
We have stood firm in darker times, and we will stand firm now.
We will keep speaking, keep working, and keep building the kind of Georgia the Georgian Dream fears most — a democratic one.

As part of this effort, Civic IDEA remains committed to helping others understand what these recent amendments mean — and how they mirror the Russian-style “foreign agent” legislation. We are ready to offer and already offering legal aid, consultations, support, and guidance to anyone seeking clarity or action.

Georgian Dream’s New “Grant Law”, A.K.A Repression on Steroids! Read More »

Senator Shaheen expresses disappointment over Anaklia port

Newswire / /

American Senator, Jeanne Shaheen expressed disappointment over the decision to award the rights of the development of the Anaklia deep-sea port development project to a Chinese company. The information thereon was reported by an Azerbaijani-American journalist, Alex Raufoglu.

According to the statement, the Georgian side canceled a port contract with Western firms and, as recent reports indicate, Georgia is planning to award the project on the Black Sea to a Chinese company. Senator Shaheen also highlighted that she and the chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, James Risch, have worked very hard to try and move Georgia forward and find it disappointing that the Georgian side is letting this opportunity slip away.

Senator’s statement follows the statement of members of the Helsinki Commission, or the Commission on European Security and Cooperation, which also responds to the Anaklia port subject and underlines the dangers that will be created by the U.S.-sanctioned Chinese companies. Notably, even after such warnings, the Georgian Dream party continues the process of awarding the port project to a Chinese consortium and once again endangers the years-long partnership developed between the West and Georgia.

Senator Shaheen expresses disappointment over Anaklia port Read More »

Trump says China might get tariff break in exchange of TikTok deal

Newswire / /

On Thursday, President Donald Trump said he might consider a deal involving TikTok in which China agrees to approve the sale of the video-sharing app, owned by ByteDance, in return for relief from U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports. 

While speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump pointed to TikTok as an example of how tariffs can serve as a negotiation tool with other countries.

“You have a situation with TikTok where China will probably say: ‘We’ll approve a deal, but will you do something on the tariffs?'” Trump said. “We could use tariffs in order to get something in return.” TikTok has until April 5 to secure a deal with a non-Chinese buyer or face a ban in the U.S.

Trump also noted that his administration is “very close” to finalizing a deal on TikTok, with several investors involved.

His comments came just one day after announcing a baseline 10% tariff on all imports to the U.S., along with increased tariffs targeting some of the nation’s major trading partners. As a result, China is now subject to a 54% tariff rate on goods exported to the U.S. TikTok has yet to respond to requests for comment.

Following Trump’s announcement of the extensive new reciprocal tariffs—especially harsh on China and its key trading partners—China’s yuan dropped to its lowest level in seven weeks, and stock markets declined sharply on Thursday. Although investors had been anticipating the tariffs for the past week, the severity of Washington’s latest measures exceeded expectations.

Trump says China might get tariff break in exchange of TikTok deal Read More »

Helsinki Commission responds to Anaklia port case

New, Newswire / /

The members of the American Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the Helsinki Commission, expressed concern over the fact that the Georgian Dream party has surrendered control of the Anaklia deep-sea port to a Chinese conglomerate, which is sanctioned by the U.S. and backed by the Chinese government.

According to the seven representatives of the commission, one of the parts of the conglomerate, China Communications Construction Company often uses infrastructure development projects to exploit and destabilise the countries and increase their dependence on China. Apart from this, the commission underlines the dangers of the growing Chinese presence in the Black Sea, which, according to them, jeopardizes the region’s safety and free trade. The statement also highlights that China grows its presence in the region by its collaboration with Russia.

According to the conclusion reached by the commission, the Georgian Dream party will further endanger the democratic trajectory of the country and the ability to determine its own economic future. The Congressmen call on the party to reconsider its decision and evaluate bids based on how fairly and transparently they develop the critical infrastructure.

It is noteworthy, that the statement is signed by Republican, as well as Democrat Senators and Congressmen.

Helsinki Commission responds to Anaklia port case Read More »

China’s Large-Scale Drills in the East China Sea: A Renewed Escalation Against Taiwan

Newswire / /

Beijing has initiated large-scale military exercises in the East China Sea, marking another escalation of its aggression against Taiwan, which China claims as part of their respective territories. The exercises aims to test the capabilities of the People’s Liberation Army and involves 76 military aircraft and 19 naval vessels, some of which entered Taiwan’s self-defense identification zone.

As part of the drills, the Chinese military released footage depicting missiles striking various targets, including animated simulations of explosions in Taiwanese cities, specifically targeting strategic locations where military bases and ports are located.

China’s campaigns against Taiwan have intensified since the 2024 elections, with Beijing labeling Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te as a “separatist” and a “parasite.” The large-scale exercises, which simulated blockades, coincided with a visit to Asia by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has strongly condemned Beijing’s military aggression.

A spokesman for Taiwan’s presidential office stated on X that China’s blatant military provocations not only pose security challenges in the Taiwan Strait but also undermine the stability of the entire region. The exercises are occurring near Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Korea, the Philippines, and the South China Sea (SCS), a crucial and disputed waterway claimed by China.

The United States, Japan, and the European Union have expressed concern over these large-scale military exercises in the South China Sea. The U.S. State Department criticized China’s military actions, stating that Beijing’s maneuvers “increase tensions and threaten regional stability.” Additionally, the European Union reiterated its opposition to any unilateral and substantial changes to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.

China has conducted numerous large-scale military exercises around Taiwan in recent years, frequently involving blockades and incursions. The recent Strait Thunder-2025A exercises underscore Beijing’s growing military power and its readiness to project force in the region, raising alarms about potential future conflicts.

China’s Large-Scale Drills in the East China Sea: A Renewed Escalation Against Taiwan Read More »

China makes new accusations against the US – investigation launched into Panama Canal deals

Newswire / /

China is making fresh accusations against the United States. Beijing’s antitrust regulators launched an investigation into the allegations that a Washington consortium is deliberately trying to delay and postpone two deals in the Panama Canal Zone. The deal was supposed to be finalized this week, but it didn’t happen.

The deal was led by BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager with $11.6 trillion in assets. BlackRock has been seen as a way to ease tensions in the region and its involvement was announced last month. BlackRock has agreed to lead a group that will buy Hong Kong firm CK Hutchison’s interests in 43 different ports, covering 199 berths in 23 countries.

However, the State Administration for Market Regulation of China, the country’s top market regulator, said it was investigating the deal to ensure that it was conducted in accordance with the law and that it protected both the principle of fair competition in the market and the public interest.

Following the announcement, CK Hutchinson decided not to sign any more agreements related to the two Panamanian ports this week.

Earlier last month, a group of investors led by BlackRock said it would spend $22.8 billion to buy the Balboa and Cristobal ports at either end of the Panama Canal from CK Hutchison.

Mike Waltz, Trump’s national security adviser, told reporters late last month that Panama’s leadership had begun “negotiations on managing the ports on both sides of the canal.”

The construction of the Panama Canal began in the early 20th century under the direction of the United States and was completed in 1914. For much of the 20th century, the canal remained under U.S. control. However, during the Carter administration, an agreement was reached to transfer control to Panama, and since 1999, the country has independently managed its operations. Upon taking office, President Donald Trump adopted a firm stance on the Panama Canal, particularly voicing concerns over the management of its ports by the Chinese company CK Hutchison. In response to this pressure, CK Hutchison ultimately decided to relinquish its position and agreed to sell its shares.

China makes new accusations against the US – investigation launched into Panama Canal deals Read More »

China’s Central Bank in Georgia: A Path Toward Debt-Trap Diplomacy?

New, Newswire / /

On March 26, 2025, the National Bank of Georgia (NBG) and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), outlining collaboration in the following areas:

  • Monetary policy;
  • Exchange of information and expertise in financial technology, payment systems, and securities market development.

During an official visit to Beijing, the Governor of the NBG, Natia Turnava, met with representatives of key Chinese state-controlled financial institutions, including the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the Bank of China, and the China Construction Bank.

As previously reported by Civic IDEA, periodic meetings between the NBG and the PBOC have taken place since March 2024, exploring avenues for cooperation. Consequently, the signing of the March 26, 2025, MOU was anticipated.

This engagement with the Chinese banking sector aligns with the increasingly anti-Western foreign policy direction pursued by the ruling Georgian Dream party. Notably, on August 30, 2021, then-chairman of the party, Irakli Kobakhidze, announced the rejection of a €75 million EU microfinance assistance package.

The pro-China orientation of the Georgian Dream has been reflected in Georgia’s evolving debt structure. As of 2025, Georgia’s external credit obligations to international financial institutions where China plays a dominant role have risen significantly:

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB): $2.26 billion
  • Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB): $211 million

While both ADB and AIIB are international financial institutions, and their cooperation does not inherently expose Georgia to “debt-trap diplomacy,” direct collaboration between the NBG and Chinese state institutions marks a significant shift. The March 26 MOU suggests that following the Anaklia port project, Georgia’s financial sector may now also fall under Chinese influence.

Risks Associated with Cooperation with China’s Banking Sector

Closer cooperation with China’s banking institutions presents economic and political challenges for Georgia, primarily due to the structural characteristics of China’s financial system:

  • Communist Party Influence: Chinese banks, akin to other state-owned enterprises, operate under Communist Party control. While the PBOC previously functioned with a degree of institutional independence, in 2024, President Xi Jinping introduced reforms tightening party oversight. As a result, analysts believe that China’s financial system has become an even more direct instrument of party policy.
  • Opacity: Unlike Western central banks, the PBOC lacks transparency. It does not adhere to a consistent communication strategy, often making abrupt monetary policy decisions without prior notification or clear justification, thereby generating uncertainty both domestically and internationally.
  • Corruption: Corruption remains a persistent issue within China’s banking sector. In 2024, former PBOC Vice Governor Fan Yifei was sentenced to life in prison for corruption, underscoring governance weaknesses.
  • Financial Instability: China’s economy continues to face significant challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted financial institutions, with Bloomberg reporting that 13% of Chinese financial entities were classified as “high-risk.” As of March 2025, China’s total debt exceeded 300% of GDP. Additionally, the ongoing US-China trade war has further exacerbated economic volatility.

Given these factors, China’s banking system functions as a tool for advancing the political ambitions of the Communist Party. China and its affiliated institutions have been actively striving to expand their global economic influence. In recent years, the People’s Republic and its close authoritarian allies, including BRICS member states, have promoted de-dollarization in international trade. In response to these efforts, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose a 100% tariff on BRICS nations.

A key player in advancing de-dollarization is the People’s Bank of China. In 2024, the PBC signed currency swap agreements with more than 40 foreign financial institutions. If cooperation between the National Bank of Georgia and the PBC intensifies, Georgia may gradually shift away from the Western monetary system, increasing its financial reliance on China.

Due to the nature of China’s financial system, several emerging economies have defaulted under the weight of its lending practices, which are characterized by:

  • Confidentiality: Former U.S. National Security Council official Grant T. Harris has highlighted that one of the defining features of Chinese loans is their secrecy. Key terms, and in some cases even the existence of the agreements, are often undisclosed.
  • Challenging Debt Restructuring: China is not a member of the Paris Club, ( an informal group of creditor nations that negotiates with debtor countries to restructure or provide relief on sovereign debt ) an international forum for coordinating debt relief. Consequently, debtor nations must engage in direct negotiations with Beijing, often resulting in outcomes that undermine their sovereignty. A notable example is Sri Lanka, which, in 2017, was compelled to transfer 70% of its strategic Hambantota Port to a Chinese state-owned entity due to its inability to service its debts.
  • Cross-Default Clauses: Many Chinese loan agreements include cross-default provisions, whereby a borrowing nation is considered in default if it fails to meet unrelated obligations. These obligations can include shifts in diplomatic policy or regime change, granting Beijing significant leverage over debtor states.
  • Collateral-Based Lending: Chinese loans frequently require collateral arrangements, sometimes involving strategic assets. In 2011, Tajikistan ceded 1,000 square kilometers of land to China as part of a debt settlement arrangement.

Considering Georgia’s past experiences in Sino-Georgian relations, the growing presence of Chinese financial institutions in the country raises credible concerns regarding potential debt-trap diplomacy. Previous agreements signed between Georgian Dream and Chinese banks have often been marked by a lack of transparency. Despite multiple reports of irregularities in Chinese banking operations, the Georgian government has consistently refrained from addressing these concerns.

In light of these trends, it remains plausible that the Georgian Dream will continue to facilitate Chinese financial expansion in Georgia, potentially exposing the country to unsustainable debt and economic dependency on Beijing.

China’s Central Bank in Georgia: A Path Toward Debt-Trap Diplomacy? Read More »

Scroll to Top