Newswire

New Legislation to ban Political Opposition

On the 34th anniversary of Georgia’s independence referendum, the ruling party, Georgian Dream, introduced controversial draft legislation to outlaw opposition parties. This move could significantly alter any shreds of the democratic framework still left in Georgia, marking a critical shift.

On 31st of March, 2025 Georgian Dream officially launched draft legislation outlawing basically the entire opposition. The actual wording of the law sounds like a repetition of the constitutional provision protecting the state from forceful overthrow of government or the creation of illegal armed forces. Still, once coupled with the political statements proceeding draft law, it is absolutely clear for all observers of the political developments in Georgia that the government guarantees fulfillment of its electoral promise to abolish the political party – National Movement, and all its “affiliates”.

Overview of Legislation:

The proposed amendments, introduced in two pivotal laws – “On Political Unions of Citizens” and “On the Constitutional Court of Georgia” – equip the Constitutional Court with extensive powers to disband political parties. Notably, parties can now be banned not only for actions threatening the state, such as advocating violence or attempting to overthrow the government, but also for more ambiguous reasons, such as sharing similar policies or membership with previously outlawed groups.

Key Provisions: 

  • The Constitutional Court may ban any party that engages in activities threatening the constitutional order or integrity of the state.
  • Parties with goals or core activities mirroring those of previously banned parties can also be prohibited, essentially preventing the reformation of these groups under new guises.

The true meaning of the initiated changes was conveyed multiple times by the leaders of the Georgian Dream, both from parliament and the executive branch. The best description comes from Mr. Makhashvili, the chair of the European Integration Committee. As Levan Makhashvili mentioned on Georgian Public Broadcaster – Channel One, recognizing the National Movement and its affiliated parties as unconstitutional was also an election promise of the Georgian Dream.

“For the possible decision of the Constitutional Court on the ban to be effective and to produce real results, and to prevent political parties from remaining in the political space with other names, other colors, and other packaging despite the Constitutional Court’s decision, specific decisions are necessary at the operational level. The parliamentary initiative serves this purpose.

Our goal is to improve the political space so that those who want to do good for the country can function in the political space. There is no place for criminals in the Georgian political space. These decisions serve not to persecute anyone but to ensure that criminal forces are not represented in the Georgian political scene,” said Levan Makhashvili.

We shall not be mistaken when reading the text of the proposed amendments, as the real goals have been clearly expressed several times over the past couple of weeks. This is the statement from March 27th by the leader of the parliamentary majority, Mr.Mdinaradze, three days after the draft law was initiated:

“They (opposition parties) will not be able to participate in the self-government elections! This will be ensured by the Georgian state and its constitutional order. Even at this stage, it is clear that the conclusion of the investigative commission will be a solid legal basis for declaring these parties unconstitutional, and the Constitutional Court, we are sure, will also make an objective decision. The collective “National Movement” will no longer be able to participate not only in the self-government elections but also in any elections held in this country. As anti-Georgian, anti-constitutional, anti-national and criminal parties, they will be declared unconstitutional parties and their activities will be prohibited! ” – stated Mamuka Mdinaradze.

New Legislation to ban Political Opposition Read More »

The U.S. maintains its “ironclad” commitment to the Asia-Pacific region

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reaffirmed Washington’s “ironclad” commitment to its defense treaty with the Philippines on Friday, pledging to provide advanced military capabilities to bolster deterrence against threats, including what he described as Chinese “aggression.”

During meetings with Philippine Defense Secretary Gilberto Teodoro and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Hegseth emphasized the strong and ongoing security cooperation between the two nations. As tensions with China rise, both sides underscored their shared commitment to maintaining peace in the Indo-Pacific and the South China Sea, where Manila has repeatedly accused Beijing of hostile actions.

“Deterrence is necessary around the world, but specifically in this region, in your country, considering the threats from the communist Chinese,” Hegseth stated. He also stressed that the United States was not seeking war and described President Donald Trump as a leader focused on peace.

In response, China dismissed concerns over freedom of navigation and airspace in the South China Sea, urging the United States to cease “instigating ideological confrontation” and “sowing discord” in the region.

Hegseth’s visit to the Philippines marks the first stop in his Asia tour. He announced that the United States would send additional advanced military assets to the Philippines, including the NMESIS anti-ship missile system and unmanned surface vehicles, which he described as “highly capable.” The two nations also agreed to conduct joint special forces training exercises on Batanes, the Philippines’ northernmost islands, which are strategically located near Taiwan.

The United States does not have formal diplomatic ties with Taiwan, but it remains the island’s most significant military supporter, bound by the Taiwan Relations Act. This law requires the U.S. to provide Taiwan with weapons for self-defense but does not explicitly state whether Washington must intervene militarily if Taiwan is attacked—a policy known as strategic ambiguity.

When asked whether the U.S. would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese attack, Rubio stated in an interview with Herridge earlier this March: “We don’t want to see a conflict. But we have made very clear through years and years of our policies – the Six Assurances, the Taiwan Relations Act – that we are against any sort of change in status by force or by threat or by coercion, and that remains our policy.”

The U.S. maintains its “ironclad” commitment to the Asia-Pacific region Read More »

European Union Warms Tone Towards China

The European Union is about to mark 50 years of diplomatic relations with China by “deepening trade and investment cooperation,” according to the EU’s trade commissioner, who spoke in Beijing on Thursday, as reported by a Chinese source.

During a meeting with Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng, Maros Sefcovic made these remarks, according to a report from Xinhua News Agency. The meeting took place on the first day of his two-day visit, with the officials dining at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse. The European Commission did not release its own account of the discussion.

Earlier that day, Sefcovic met with Chinese Customs Minister Sun Meijun before attending an event hosted by the EU Chamber of Commerce in China, where he engaged with European businesses.

At the business event, the Slovak commissioner reportedly reinforced a shift in tone that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has emphasized in several speeches this year.  

In those speeches, von der Leyen—who has previously taken a firm stance on China—has moderated her language, stressing that the EU could expand trade ties with Beijing and even explore new agreements.

These public remarks were intended to signal to the United States that Europe has options. However, according to EU sources, they were also meant to indicate to China that Brussels remains open to credible proposals.

European Union Warms Tone Towards China Read More »

China as a Challenge in the U.S. Annual Threat Assessment Report

A recent U.S. Annual Threat Assessment from the U.S. Intelligence community highlights the military and cybersecurity threats posed by China, particularly concerning its ambitions toward Taiwan. The report indicates that while Beijing has made notable advancements in enhancing its military capabilities, this progress has been inconsistent. Additionally, the document emphasizes that China’s growing military prowess empowers it to confront the United States with conventional weapons and execute cyberattacks that pose significant risks to critical American infrastructure and assets.

Additionally, the report indicates that China is poised to surpass the United States as a global leader in artificial intelligence by 2030. This ambition is part of a broader strategy to enhance its technological edge, with potentially profound implications for international security. CIA Director John Ratcliffe highlighted that China is actively working to restrict the flow of chemicals used in fentanyl production into the United States, acknowledging the economic repercussions this crisis has on its own businesses.

The tensions between the U.S. and China have been further fueled by the fentanyl crisis in America, which remains the leading cause of drug overdose deaths. In response to Beijing’s perceived inaction in curbing the supply of this dangerous substance, the Trump administration implemented a 20% tariff on Chinese imports. Conversely, Chinese diplomats, including Liu Pengyu, have accused the U.S. of exaggerating the “China threat” to justify its military dominance. Liu emphasized that China is dedicated to peace, stability, and progress while safeguarding its sovereignty and security, suggesting that the U.S. should take responsibility for its own public health challenges.

The intelligence report highlights the military pressure that China exerts on Taiwan, noting that the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is actively enhancing its capabilities to assert control over the island and counter any potential U.S. intervention. This development raises significant concerns among American policymakers, reflecting Beijing’s increasing readiness to employ military force to enforce its territorial claims. However, it is essential to recognize that China is grappling with substantial domestic challenges, including widespread corruption, an aging population, and economic vulnerabilities that could undermine the Communist Party’s hold on power. Analysts anticipate that China’s economy may continue to decelerate, driven by declining consumer and investor confidence. These internal issues could complicate Beijing’s external ambitions and reshape its strategic calculations. As the geopolitical landscape evolves, the interplay between China’s external aspirations and its internal realities will be crucial in determining the future of U.S.-China relations and the dynamics of regional security.

Author: Liza Barbakadze

China as a Challenge in the U.S. Annual Threat Assessment Report Read More »

Washington’s new tariffs on Chinese ships

A major debate is underway in Washington this week between U.S. officials and representatives of the American maritime, export and agricultural sectors, which was triggered by the imposition of additional tariffs on Chinese-made and Chinese-owned ships calling at U.S. ports.

The president’s plan calls for a revival of the local shipbuilding industry by imposing tariffs of up to $1.5 million on ships bound for China.

In arguing for the critical importance of imposing the tariffs, the USTR argues that Chinese government subsidies harm American businesses by limiting competition and investment opportunities, while also posing economic and national security risks that Beijing could use strategically in a potential conflict.

The measure, which enjoys bipartisan support in Congress, is intended to discourage ocean carriers from buying Chinese ships, while the proceeds from the tariffs would be used to revive the U.S. shipping industry.

These potential port fees have limited the availability of ships needed to deliver agricultural, energy, mining, construction, and manufacturing products to international consumers.

Shipowners have already withdrawn their bids to ship coal to the United States in the future, as a result of the USTR’s sanctions, Xcoal Energy & Resources CEO Ernie Thrasher said in a letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

As Thrasher notes, the imposition and enforcement of these penalties could result in a complete halt to U.S. coal exports for 60 days, jeopardizing $130 billion in shipments. In addition, these penalties could increase the market value of U.S. coal supplies by 35%, making them uncompetitive on the world market.

The proposed tariffs could also make it harder for U.S. exports of other energy products, such as oil, liquefied natural gas and fuel oil, the American Petroleum Institute said in a submission to the USTR.

More than 200 companies, trade groups and individuals have already submitted comments or requested to speak at the hearing, which will take place over two days in Washington this week. Nearly all groups oppose a proposal by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to impose millions of dollars in new tariffs every time a Chinese-made ship enters a U.S. port.

Washington’s new tariffs on Chinese ships Read More »

Chinese Premier met with American Senator

On March 23rd, in Beijing, after the annual business summit, the Chinese Premier, Li Qiang, held a meeting with American Senator Steve Daines and the representatives of the large U.S. businesses, such as Pfizer and Apple.

Notably, Daines is the first American politician to visit China after Donald Trump’s inauguration. He is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Trump’s avid supporter. Apart from this, he was involved in the negotiations between the U.S. and China on trade issues during Trump’s first term as President.

The meeting is especially important to China after the increased tariffs from the American side – the country is trying to expand foreign investment and convince businesses that the country’s economic environment is favorable. The Premier called on American companies to „resist protectionism“ and defend globalization.

According to Li Qiang, China will increase access to markets in various sectors for foreign investors. He warned the representatives that „breaking supply chains would only deepen crises“.

The Premier also remarked that China is ready for „unexpected shocks caused by external sources,“ and the government will introduce new policies to guarantee the smooth operation of the Chinese economy where it’s needed.

Chinese Premier met with American Senator Read More »

China-Iran ties could prompt a tougher US stance

Analysts anticipate that Washington will increase pressure on Tehran in response to last week’s trilateral nuclear talks between China, Iran, and Russia – an expectation that aligns with the growing consensus in the U.S. against both Beijing, the host of the meeting, and Iran.

The discussions, which urged an end to “illegal sanctions” on Tehran, took place just days after Iran dismissed Donald Trump’s proposal to restart negotiations on its nuclear program. 

Wang met with Iranian and Russian deputy foreign ministers on Friday, stressing China’s hope that “all parties will meet each other halfway and resume dialogue and negotiations as soon as possible.” He also urged the U.S. to “show political sincerity and return to the talks as soon as possible.”

Meanwhile, the U.S. and five other nations convened a closed-door Security Council meeting to discuss the matter, with Britain suggesting that sanctions could be reinstated if Iran expanded its nuclear program. According to China’s foreign ministry, Wang further expressed opposition to any “forced intervention” by the United Nations Security Council.

Despite facing resistance, China remains committed to pursuing multilateral negotiations on the nuclear issue. Experts believe Beijing will use these discussions to strengthen its role as a key mediator in the Middle East while expanding its regional influence.

During the March 14 talks in Beijing, the three nations reaffirmed their dedication to non-proliferation and jointly condemned “sanctions, pressure, or the threat of force.” Additionally, Wang proposed a five-point plan to address the Iranian nuclear issue, which emphasized adherence to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear deal. The U.S. abandoned this agreement under President Donald Trump during his first term.

The U.S. on Thursday issued new Iran-related sanctions, targeting entities including for the first time a Chinese “teapot,” or independent refinery, and vessels that supplied crude oil to such processing plants.

It was Washington’s fourth round of sanctions on Iran’s oil sales since President Donald Trump said in February he was re-imposing a “maximum pressure” campaign including efforts to drive down the country’s exports to zero. Trump aims to stop Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and funding militant groups.

China-Iran ties could prompt a tougher US stance Read More »

BRICS’ Push for Alternative Currency Sparks Trump’s Backlash

During his visit to Washington last October, India’s Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, eagerly shared photos of his discussions with Biden administration officials Gina Raimondo and Katherine Tai. He also spoke publicly about the strong, long-standing ties between India and the United States.

However, Goyal’s recent visit to Washington earlier this month painted a starkly different picture. This time, he left without providing any details about his meetings with the newly appointed US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, and Trade Representative, Jamieson Greer. A week after his return, he shared a single photo with Greer on social media, stating only that their discussion was “forward-looking” and guided by an “India First” perspective.

Goyal’s sudden trip to the US, which had originally been planned for April, was prompted by US President Donald Trump’s announcement that starting April 2, reciprocal tariffs would be imposed on all US trading partners.

An even bigger concern for India—and other members of the BRICS—was Trump’s strong stance against their attempts to lessen dependence on the US dollar in international trade. The former president dismissed BRICS as “dead” and warned of a 100 percent tariff hike on imports from the bloc’s nations, accusing them of “playing games with the dollar.”

Despite Trump’s claims, BRICS has struggled to move forward with the idea of establishing an alternative currency due to its lack of a cohesive structure, making it difficult for member states to reach a consensus on such an ambitious initiative. In February 2025, it was announced that Brazil had decided not to join the common currency plan. With this decision, the country safeguarded its close economic ties with the United States.

BRICS’ Push for Alternative Currency Sparks Trump’s Backlash Read More »

China’s Global Times praises Trump for defunding USAGM

China’s state-owned newspaper, the Global Times, expressed approval on Monday regarding budget cuts to the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM). This agency oversees broadcasters such as Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), who have a history of critical reporting on Beijing.

In an editorial published Monday, the Global Times accused VOA of biased reporting on China-related issues. The editorial claimed that “almost every malicious falsehood about China has VOA’s fingerprints all over it.” It listed alleged examples, including coverage of human rights concerns in Xinjiang, territorial disputes in the South China Sea, and the so-called “China virus” narrative.

Other nationalist commentators also took aim at VOA and RFA. This included a columnist from the Communist Party-affiliated Beijing Daily and Hu Xijin, the former editor-in-chief of the Global Times. Additionally, former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen joined the criticism, writing on social media that the funding cuts were a significant step in eliminating fake news, disinformation, lies, distortions, incitement, and chaos around the world.”

Funding cuts stem from an executive order signed by Trump on Friday, which mandated reductions in operations for seven federal entities, including USAGM and the Wilson Center think tank. The move aligns with broader efforts to scale back foreign aid and cut the civilian workforce. 

The impact of the funding reduction has been swift. As of Monday, VOA’s broadcasts have ceased, and its website has not published any new content beyond March 15. RFA continues to release content for the time being, though it is bracing for upcoming staff furloughs.

The cuts have sparked debate in Washington. While Secretary of State Marco Rubio has publicly supported Uygur’s rights, the State Department has remained vague on the situation. 

Democrats have strongly opposed the decision to defund USAGM’s media outlets. U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen condemned the move as “unfathomable.” She vowed to protect legally mandated USAGM functions and argued that Trump’s actions threaten press freedom.  “If President Trump gets his way, those who depend on US-supported independent media as alternatives to Chinese- and Kremlin-run media outlets and those living under authoritarian regimes will lose a critical lifeline,” she said.

China’s Global Times praises Trump for defunding USAGM Read More »

China’s Growing Interests in Africa: Strategic Ports and Energy Resources

China’s interests in the African continent are growing stronger every day. Chinese state-owned companies have built, financed, and now control a quarter of African ports.

Of the 231 ports in 31 African countries, China has invested in 78. The majority of them are in western Africa. As Paul Nantulia, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies at the National Defense University in Washington, points out, the main reason for this is China’s global trade ambitions, in the achievement of which the region’s strategic location plays a major role.

China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC) was the contractor and engineering company for the Lekki Deep Sea Port in Nigeria. The company acquired a 54% stake in the port, which it operates under a 16-year lease, and receives financing from the China Development Bank.

According to China’s current five-year plan, Africa is a key part of its trade strategy. Currently, investment flows to the continent are driven by two projects: the Belt and Road Initiative and Beijing’s “exit policy” – the government’s drive to help local firms enter international markets, including Africa.

According to the five-year strategic plan document, three of the six trade corridors pass through the African continent, namely East Africa, the Egypt-Suez region, and Tunisia.

In addition, China has been interested in African liquefied natural gas in recent years and has been investing heavily in it. Until now, China has been more interested in African oil, but now the main target of Chinese businesses is African liquefied natural gas, to, on the one hand, meet increased demand and, on the other hand, reduce dependence on Australian gas.

Mozambique is one of the target countries. After the discovery of 5 trillion cubic meters of natural gas in the Rovuma Basin off the country’s northern coast, it has become an important point for global natural gas supply. China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) owns 20% of the $ 30 billion Rovuma liquefied natural gas project.

China is also involved in one of the projects in Mozambique, “Coral Floating Liquefied Natural Gas”, the first liquefied natural gas which was sold in 2022.

China’s Growing Interests in Africa: Strategic Ports and Energy Resources Read More »

Scroll to Top