Newswire

Increasing Threat: Space Arms Race Between Great Powers

Newswire / /

The strategic competition between China and the United States is rapidly expanding beyond Earth’s boundaries and into space. Both Chinese and American authorities are raising alarms over escalating military threats in orbit.

In a May 2025 article, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warned that the United States’ growing space warfare capabilities are intensifying military rivalry and undermining space security.

The U.S. Space Force recently awarded a $60 million contract to American company Gravitics to develop an advanced orbital transport system capable of launching maneuverable spacecraft within hours. Gravitics aims to demonstrate this “game-changing” system in early 2026.

Michael Guetlein, Vice Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force, acknowledged the rising military threats in space. He cited China’s 2024 “dogfighting” exercises as a concerning example, along with the potential development of nuclear-armed satellites by Russia.

Newly released documents from the U.S. Space Force reveal Washington’s intent to significantly enhance its military capabilities in orbit. The plans emphasize strengthening command and control mechanisms, achieving space superiority, and minimizing the risk of foreign interference during U.S. space operations.

China’s PLA has expressed deep concern over these developments, viewing America’s initiatives with suspicion. With these rising tensions, space is increasingly becoming a new frontier in the great power competition.

Increasing Threat: Space Arms Race Between Great Powers Read More »

China’s Strategic Expansion: Visa-Free Travel for Five Latin American Countries

Newswire / /

The People’s Republic of China has announced that, effective June 1, 2025, for a period of one year, citizens of Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Uruguay will be exempt from visa requirements, integrating these Latin American nations into China’s global economic and cultural network alongside strategic partners such as Japan, South Korea, and European states. This initiative, driven by China’s leadership, aims to deepen cooperation with over 150 countries across Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America. According to China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the policy, which permits stays of up to 30 days for tourism, business, or personal purposes, was activated following the China-Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) Forum in Beijing, where a $9.2 billion financial support package and infrastructure investments were announced, underscoring China’s long-term regional ambitions.

Latin America remains a pivotal arena for geopolitical competition between China and the United States, with China emerging as a significant trade partner for regional economic leaders such as Brazil, Argentina, and Chile. This policy facilitates increased imports of high-quality products and supports infrastructure projects, such as Peru’s Chancay Port, which streamlines trade linkages between South America and China. The growth in bilateral trade indicators in early 2025 highlights the economic potential of this cooperation, though restrictive measures imposed by the United States, as observed in other regions, pose certain challenges. Regional analysts note that China’s openness enhances its cultural influence, particularly through the promotion of its arts and traditional cuisine.

The year 2025 marks a significant milestone in strengthening China-Latin America relations, with China’s leadership emphasizing the expansion of cooperation in education, culture, and tourism to foster people-to-people connections. According to regional experts, the visa waiver will boost tourist flows, activate trade exhibitions, and enhance economic collaboration, particularly through support for projects like the Chancay Port, which optimizes trade logistics. However, experts indicate that realizing the policy’s full potential requires the implementation of exchange programs in education and business to ensure long-term benefits are maximized. 

China positions itself as a strategic supporter of developing nations, as evidenced by the $9.2 billion financial package announced at the CELAC Forum, focused on advancing infrastructure, clean energy, and economic development. This policy, particularly for countries like Brazil and Chile, which are part of the Belt and Road Initiative, strengthens China’s economic and political presence in the region. Analysts assess this move as a counterbalance to the United States’ restrictive policies, though its long-term success hinges on the stability of cooperation and the engagement of regional partners.

China’s Strategic Expansion: Visa-Free Travel for Five Latin American Countries Read More »

China’s Strategic Expansion: Colombia Joins the BRI

Newswire / /

China and Colombia have signed a cooperation plan within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), marking Colombia’s official entry into this massive global project. The Belt and Road Initiative, proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013, aims to revive the historical Silk Road through a modern infrastructure and economic network connecting over 150 countries across Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America.

During a meeting with Colombian President Gustavo Petro, who was in Beijing for the Fourth Ministerial Meeting of the China-CELAC Forum, Chinese President Xi Jinping stated that this agreement offers an opportunity to deepen bilateral cooperation, particularly in areas such as infrastructure, trade, and sustainable development. This move reflects China’s growing influence in Latin America, where it is already the largest trading partner for several countries.

Latin America has become a key region for geopolitical competition between China and the United States. China, Colombia’s second-largest trading partner after the US, expresses its readiness to increase imports of high-quality Colombian products and support Chinese companies in infrastructure construction, including railway corridors and renewable energy projects. In the first four months of 2025, bilateral trade reached $6.7 billion USD, demonstrating the economic potential of the cooperation. However, US pressure, such as Panama’s withdrawal from the BRI, poses certain challenges to China’s ambitions, especially given the region’s strategic importance to the US. Nevertheless, Colombia’s accession to the BRI confirms the success of China’s diplomatic maneuvers, which simultaneously strengthen economic cooperation and political influence in the Global South.

The year 2025 marks the 45th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and Colombia, which Xi Jinping called a “new historical starting point.” He emphasized the need to strengthen political trust and deepen cooperation in education, culture, and tourism to increase people-to-people exchanges and consolidate the public foundation of bilateral friendship. Gustavo Petro said that Colombia is ready to strengthen its strategic partnership with China, especially in areas such as new energy, artificial intelligence, and infrastructure, which serve to improve people’s lives.

The Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs described its membership in the BRI as a “historic step” that opens new opportunities for investment, technological cooperation, and sustainable development. Foreign Minister Laura Sarabia stated that this agreement creates “endless possibilities” for trade, investment, and tourism, while Petro noted on social media that “the history of Colombia’s foreign relations is changing,” implying global integration based on equality and freedom. These statements underscore Colombia’s ambition to become a more active player in the global economy with China’s support.

China presents itself as a supporter of the Global South and a multilateral order. Within the framework of the China-CELAC Forum, Xi Jinping announced $9.2 billion USD in development credit, focusing on infrastructure, clean energy, and the fight against transnational crime. Colombia’s contribution as the pro tempore president of CELAC to the forum’s success has strengthened its role in cooperation with China, serving the vision of a “shared future.” This vision is part of South-South cooperation and reflects China’s efforts to strengthen its influence in developing countries.

China’s Strategic Expansion: Colombia Joins the BRI Read More »

US-China Tariff Deal: Agreement Reached, Interpretations Diverge

Newswire / /

On May 12, the negotiations between the United States and China concluded in Switzerland, resulting in a preliminary agreement on tariff reductions. While the agreement has been portrayed as a diplomatic breakthrough by both sides, the long-term trajectory of US-China relations remains uncertain.

According to the terms of the agreement, both countries will implement partial tariff rollbacks. Several tariff restrictions will be suspended for a 90-day period beginning May 14, pending the conclusion of a comprehensive deal. Specifically, the additional tariffs introduced during the Trump administration on Chinese imports will be reduced from 145% to 30%, while China will lower its tariffs on US goods from 125% to 10%.

Despite this progress, many trade barriers remain in place. President Donald Trump stated on Monday that tariff reductions would exclude key sectors such as automobiles, steel, and aluminum. He emphasized that one of the primary objectives for future negotiations would be expanding American business access to the Chinese market.

The two sides have presented divergent interpretations of the agreement. The White House described the outcome as a “victory” for the Trump administration. In contrast, Chinese officials framed the deal as a result of Beijing’s firm negotiating stance. During a meeting on May 13 with representatives from Latin America and the Caribbean, including Brazil, Colombia, and Chile, President Xi Jinping remarked, “There are no winners in a tariff or trade war. Bullying or hegemonism only leads to self-isolation.”

China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a formal statement describing the agreement as being “in the interests of both countries and the common interests of the world.” Nonetheless, in a parallel development, Chinese government agencies, including the Ministries of Commerce and State Security, reportedly discussed plans to introduce tighter controls on the export of strategic minerals.

While the agreement marks a step forward in de-escalating trade tensions, the underlying geopolitical and economic rivalries between Washington and Beijing remain unresolved.

US-China Tariff Deal: Agreement Reached, Interpretations Diverge Read More »

China’s Diplomatic Maneuvers: Ukraine Ceasefire and the Pursuit of Global Influence

Newswire / /

China has voiced support for a 30-day ceasefire initiative in Ukraine, proposed by Kyiv, the United States, and Europe, aimed at creating space for diplomatic negotiations. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian stated that Beijing backs any efforts to promote peace and is ready to collaborate with the international community to resolve the “Ukraine crisis.” This position follows U.S. President Donald Trump’s call for major powers, including China and Turkey, to engage in resolving the conflict. China’s statement is a strategic maneuver to bolster its image as a global peacemaker while maintaining a neutral stance to avoid friction with Russia, its key partner. This move also seeks to improve ties with Europe amid high U.S. tariffs, though China’s close alignment with Russia raises questions about its impartiality, framing its diplomacy as a delicate balancing act.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, while rejecting the 30-day ceasefire, proposed direct negotiations with Ukraine without preconditions, a move European leaders (Britain, France, Germany, Poland) labeled as a rejection of their “ultimatum” to accept an unconditional truce or face increased sanctions and arms supplies. Lin Jian responded by affirming China’s support for all peace-promoting efforts, emphasizing that dialogue is the only path to a “fair, lasting, and binding” agreement. China’s cautious stance, avoiding direct criticism of Russia, reflects its intent to preserve stability with its primary economic and military partner. This approach allows China to position itself as a global leader facilitating peace, but its reluctance to pressure Russia limits its practical influence, highlighting its prioritization of strategic ties over decisive mediation.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated in March that a 30-day ceasefire could be used to draft a comprehensive peace plan, a proposal stemming from U.S.-led talks in Jeddah. Zelenskyy emphasized Ukraine’s support for the ceasefire but ruled out territorial concessions.China’s endorsement of this initiative aligns with Ukraine’s goals, yet its neutral posture, which avoids condemning Russia’s actions, limits its effectiveness as a mediator. China’s involvement appears more symbolic than substantive, as it seeks to enhance its global standing without taking steps that could jeopardize its relationship with Russia, a key ally in countering Western influence.

Lin Jian further reiterated that China supports all parties engaging in negotiations to achieve a “fair and lasting” agreement, expressing readiness to play a “constructive role.” This stance underscores China’s belief that dialogue and negotiations are the only viable solutions to the “Ukraine crisis.” China’s repeated emphasis on dialogue, without explicitly supporting any side, demonstrates its strategy to gain diplomatic leverage in the West while maintaining Russia’s support as a strategic partner. This dual approach reflects China’s broader geopolitical ambitions to strengthen its role as a global leader, though its influence on resolving the Ukraine conflict remains constrained by its loyalty to Russia.

China’s Diplomatic Maneuvers: Ukraine Ceasefire and the Pursuit of Global Influence Read More »

China and Russia vow to respond to the “US military threat” jointly

Newswire / /

On Thursday, China and Russia accused the United States of heightening the risk of nuclear war and pledged to work together to address emerging threats, underscoring the intensifying strategic confrontation between Beijing, Moscow, and Washington.

Following a meeting in Moscow between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, the two countries issued a joint statement focused on global strategic stability. In it, they condemned several U.S. policies, including the expansion of military alliances, the forward deployment of strategic weapons, the development of global missile defense systems like the “Golden Dome,” the militarization of space, and the sharing of nuclear technology with allied nations.

According to the statement, such U.S. actions seek “overwhelming military supremacy” and “absolute strategic security” and are “undermining global strategic stability, spurring an arms race and increasing conflict potential both among nuclear-weapon states and in the international arena as a whole.”

Xi Jinping emphasized that China and Russia have a “special responsibility” to stand up to power politics.

The statement further noted: “The two sides note with concern that against the backdrop of aggravation in the relations between nuclear-weapon states, which in some cases has escalated to the threat of a direct military clash, a critical mass of problems and challenges has accumulated in the strategic sphere, and the risk of nuclear conflict has increased.”

This statement was one of over 20 bilateral documents signed to strengthen the countries’ “no-limits” partnership during Xi’s visit, which coincided with Russia’s celebration of the 80th anniversary of Germany’s defeat in World War II.

Reflecting their shared security stance toward the U.S.-led West, the statement denounced the expansion of military alliances and coalitions by “some nuclear-weapon states” as one of “the most pressing strategic risks to be urgently addressed.” It also condemned the deployment of missiles in non-nuclear countries that target nuclear-armed states, declaring: “the two sides strongly condemn such provocative activities that undermine regional stability and global security.”

Russia has consistently opposed NATO’s eastward expansion after the Cold War, arguing it threatens Russian security and citing it as a justification for its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Meanwhile, China has criticized the U.S. push to form “small circles” of alliances in the Indo-Pacific and has objected to U.S. missile deployments near its borders, such as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system in South Korea and the Typhoon missile system in the Philippines.

The statement specifically criticized the newly announced “Golden Dome for America” global missile defense system, which also includes space-based interception weapons. According to the statement, the “Golden Dome for America” system would also turn space into a battlefield.” The United States established its Space Force as a military branch in 2019 and officially designated space as a warfighting domain in 2020.

The statement also condemned the “use of commercial space systems to interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign states and armed conflicts involving third countries,” likely referring to the Starlink satellite internet system, operated by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which has played a crucial communications role in the Ukraine conflict.

Lastly, the joint statement reaffirmed the importance of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and global conventions banning biological and chemical weapons. It accused the U.S. and its allies of engaging in “military biological activities” both at home and abroad.

China and Russia vow to respond to the “US military threat” jointly Read More »

China and Russia Strengthen Strategic Partnership in Moscow

Newswire / /

Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Moscow on May 7 for a four-day state visit to attend the 80th anniversary celebrations of the victory over fascism and hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The visit, which includes the May 9 military parade, underscores the “deeply strategic” relationship between the two nations, aimed at countering global “hegemonism,” particularly in response to the U.S.’s “America First” policies. Xi, referred to by Putin as the “main guest,” emphasizes the need for China and Russia to jointly oppose “hegemony and power politics,” reflecting their united front amid shifting global alliances. This visit highlights the two authoritarian states’ efforts to bolster unity in a reconfiguring geopolitical landscape.

The visit takes place against the backdrop of the U.S. imposing 145% tariffs on Chinese goods and intensifying Western sanctions on Russia, pushing both nations to deepen economic and political cooperation. Bilateral trade reached a record $237 billion in 2024, with China becoming Russia’s primary supplier of oil, gas, vehicles, and electronics, supporting Moscow’s military-industrial complex. Analysts note that U.S. attempts to “reset” relations with Russia to drive a wedge between China and Russia are unlikely to succeed, as both countries benefit from this “highly asymmetric” partnership, with Russia increasingly reliant on China. This dynamic strengthens their mutual dependence but complicates China’s relations with Europe.

Among the invited guests are leaders from Brazil, Serbia, Slovakia, and other nations, reflecting Moscow’s efforts to present itself as a globally supported power despite Western attempts to isolate it. Putin described Xi’s visit as “special,” and the participation of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army honor guard in the parade symbolically reinforces the unity between the two nations. Analysis suggests that this event allows Russia to showcase its military might while enabling China to solidify its position as a global player, particularly as it navigates U.S. trade pressures and seeks to maintain influence in Asia and Europe.

In an article published in Russia’s Rossiyskaya Gazeta, Xi expressed gratitude to Moscow for supporting Taiwan’s reunification with China, emphasizing that this stance is part of the post-World War II international order. He further stated that China and Russia jointly oppose “power politics,” likely referring to the U.S.’s disruptive trade tariffs. Analysts suggest that these statements are aimed at improving ties with European nations to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs, though China’s close alignment with Russia risks eroding trust in Europe, especially given accusations of supporting Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

According to the Kremlin, Xi and Putin will discuss strengthening bilateral cooperation, including the Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline project, the Ukraine conflict, and international issues such as support for Iran. Several agreements are expected to be signed, further solidifying economic and diplomatic ties between the two nations. Analysis indicates that China’s “neutral” stance on the Ukraine conflict, coupled with its economic support for Russia, complicates its relations with the West but enhances its role as an alternative global leader. This delicate balancing act underscores China’s strategic maneuvering in a multipolar world.

China and Russia Strengthen Strategic Partnership in Moscow Read More »

US House of Representatives to consider new anti-China bills

Newswire / /

The U.S. House of Representatives will consider new legislative initiatives against China on May 6. The bills mainly deal with export controls, alleged human rights violations, national defense, and economic espionage.

The bill, introduced by McCormick in February 2025, would impose sanctions on individuals who engage in trade espionage, provide assistance to opposing militaries, or violate U.S. export laws.

Within 30 days of the enactment of this Act, the President of the United States is authorized to impose the following types of sanctions on persons convicted of economic espionage under this Act:

  1. Blocking of Property – Exercise of all powers granted to the President by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to the extent necessary to block and prohibit all transactions involving property or interests in property of a foreign person, if such property or interests in property are located in the United States or are owned or controlled by a person resident in the United States.
  2. Ineligibility for Visas, Admissions, or Parole – Inadmissibility to the United States; Revocation of the right to a visa or other document to enter the United States; Cancellation of any visa or other document granting entry into the country, regardless of when the visa or other document was issued or whether it was issued.

The anti-China bills have bipartisan support, with Republicans actively blaming China for what they say is hindering Trump’s peace efforts in Ukraine. As Representative Brian Mast,  a Republican from Florida, put it, “the Chinese Communist Party is relentlessly undermining President Trump’s efforts to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.”

The “Falun Gong Protection Act,” introduced by Perry on February 24, 2025, that  is also being considered on May 6, would impose sanctions on Chinese individuals involved in the forced organ harvesting and other forms of violence against Falun Gong practitioners, a religious group considered a cult by Beijing. The sanctions are aimed at forcing the Chinese Communist Party to end any state-sponsored organ harvesting campaign.

In an effort to strengthen relations with Taiwan, a key concern of China, the House of Representatives is also considering amending the Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement Initiative (TAIPEI) Act of 2019 to require the United States, as a member of any international organization, to oppose any attempt by the People’s Republic of China to resolve the issue of Taiwan’s status through procedural distortions, unlawful language, or policies. The amended bill would require the State Department to review U.S.-Taiwan relations and report back at least every five years. The Taiwan International Solidarity Act also requires the preparation of an annual report on China’s attempts to diplomatically isolate Taiwan and obliges US officials to call on international partners to resist, if necessary.

US House of Representatives to consider new anti-China bills Read More »

China suggests that COVID-19 originated in the USA

Newswire / /

On April 18th, the official page of the White House launched a website about COVID-19, according to which, the coronavirus originated from a lab leak in China. The website also criticized the former US President, Joe Biden, a former top U.S. health official, Anthony Fauci, and the World Health Organization (WHO).

In the white paper published by Xinhua, China accused the United States of politicizing the subject of the origins of COVID-19 and used the Missouri lawsuit to prove its point, as a result of which a $24 billion obligation was imposed on China for covering up the outbreak and hoarding protective health equipment.

The document emphasizes that there is evidence that the Coronavirus existed in the United States earlier than the officially claimed timeline. Additionally, China talks about the neglect of the severity of the epidemic by the US government, which compared it to the common flu, as well as insisted that the coronavirus would disappear one day automatically. The white paper also underlines that such an attitude from the U.S. severed international cooperation, and the withholding of information by the state interfered with the research conducted by other countries and the WHO.

Apart from the above-mentioned, the Chinese side used the joint study of the WHO and China to prove the country’s innocence, according to which, the lab leak in China is “extremely unlikely”. China calls on the U.S. to respond to the legitimate concerns of the international community.

The renewed discussion around the origins of the coronavirus is a part of the heightened tensions between China and the United States, which is apparent in trade, as well as many other matters – in the context of increased competition between two countries, attention is focused on any issue that will help the parties gain an advantage.

China suggests that COVID-19 originated in the USA Read More »

How Australia Responds to Decreasing Chinese Exports

Newswire / /

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced that if his party wins the upcoming election, it will spend 1.2 billion Australian dollars (£580 million) to create a strategic reserve of critical minerals. This promise follows China’s decision to impose export restrictions on seven rare earth elements that are essential for the production of electric vehicles, fighter jets, and robots. Although China’s restrictions will affect all countries, the move is widely seen as a response to tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

Rare earths refer to 17 chemical elements that are called “rare” not because they are scarce, but because they are difficult to extract and process. Elements such as samarium and terbium are essential for manufacturing technologies that will shape the future global market, from electric vehicles to high-tech weapons systems. Both China and Australia have rare earth deposits, but China controls about 90% of global processing, the stage that prepares minerals for use in technology. This distribution of resources gives China leverage over supply chains.

Experts point out that Washington’s inability to secure a reliable supply of rare earths has made the mineral issue one of the Trump administration’s main focuses, especially amid growing U.S.-China diplomatic tensions. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, between 2019 and 2022, 75% of the rare earths imported into the U.S. came from China. Notably, the United States and Ukraine have signed an “economic partnership agreement” that will give Washington access to Kyiv’s mineral resources in exchange for establishing an investment fund in Ukraine.

Philip Kirchlechner, director of Iron Ore Research, told the BBC that Western countries were late to recognize the importance of rare earths. This allowed China to quickly establish a monopoly over processing. In the expert’s view, increasing Australian reserves won’t matter much if China still controls the processing stage. Lithium, which is not classified as a rare earth but is essential for manufacturing batteries for electric vehicles and solar panels, is a good example. Australia produces 33% of the world’s lithium but processes only a small portion of it and exports the rest. China, meanwhile, mines 23% of the world’s lithium but processes 57% of it, according to the International Energy Agency.

Despite initiatives to boost Australia’s mining and processing capabilities, according to Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies, the country will likely remain dependent on Chinese processing at least until 2026. In articles published in Australian media, China’s ambassador in Canberra criticized Washington’s global trade policy and called on Australia to “join” Beijing. Australia quickly responded negatively to China’s appeal.

Australia is also leveraging its natural resources in negotiations with the Trump administration. For example, exports of several types of critical minerals have been exempted from the 10% tariff imposed on most Australian products.

Experts believe that Albanese’s plan is mainly aimed at protecting Australia and its allies from potential threats from China. Natixis chief economist Alicia García-Herrero told the BBC that Albanese’s strategy is “more sophisticated” compared to previous plans because it allows the country to supply its resources to international markets during times of economic tension.

In the context of reduced Chinese exports, García-Herrero said Australia will sell more minerals on the market, helping to ease price increases and weaken China’s influence. However, she also noted that Australia will not be able to fully replace China.

How Australia Responds to Decreasing Chinese Exports Read More »

Scroll to Top