Tinatin Khidasheli Cited in a Springer Journal
Tinatin Khidasheli Cited in a Springer Journal Read More »
Civic IDEA’s Chairperson, Tinatin Khidasheli, has been cited in the article “Hotspot Geopolitics: Political Economy of the Belt and Road Initiative in South Caucasus”, published in Springer’s Chinese Political Science Review journal.
Authored by Mher D. Sahakyan and Kevin Lo, the article explores the geopolitical and geoeconomic opportunities and challenges presented by China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in the South Caucasus region. It provides an in-depth analysis of Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia’s relations with Beijing.
In the case of Georgia, the authors reference Khidasheli’s insights on the Sino-Georgian Strategic Partnership and economic relations.
Full article: “Hotspot Geopolitics: Political Economy of the Belt and Road Initiative in South Caucasus”.
Tinatin Khidasheli Cited in a Springer Journal Read More »
Civic IDEA’s new report examines the growing use of Chinese surveillance cameras by the ruling Georgian Dream party in various locations, including near the Parliament building, where peaceful demonstrations continue.
In January and February 2025, the Public Safety Command Center 112 significantly increased its procurement of Chinese surveillance cameras, highlighting a rising trend in the use of such technologies to monitor Georgian citizens engaged in protests.
The report underscores key concerns associated with the use of Chinese surveillance technologies, including their implications for human rights violations.
For further details, please refer to the full report below: 👇
Georgian Dream’s Surveillance of Protesters through Chinese Cameras Read More »
Georgia is facing its most acute political crisis. Protests have continued for 106 days, with unwavering demands for new elections. However, as global attention remains fixed on broader security challenges, Georgia is receiving relatively less focus than in previous crises.
The ruling party, Georgian Dream, sees this as an opportunity to push forward its hidden deals – including the attempted sale of the Anaklia Port to China. Our latest research, Beijing’s Black Sea Push: A New Maritime Frontier, delves into the implications of this shift. With Georgia’s strategic location at the intersection of Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, the Anaklia port is poised to become a crucial hub for China’s Belt and Road Initiative, potentially reshaping regional trade and security dynamics. The consequences for Western engagement, economic leverage, and geopolitical stability are significant. This issue is too important to ignore.
Powered By EmbedPress
Beijing’s Black Sea Push: A New Maritime Frontier Read More »
The chairwomen of “Civic IDEA” Tinatin Khidasheli participated in the Paris Security and Strategy Forum as a speaker on the panel “The Black Sea: Between Conflicts and EU Enlargement Perspectives.”
Her speech addressed Georgia’s role in the region, highlighting the relocation of the Russian fleet to Ochamchire in occupied Abkhazia and the potential Chinese takeover of the Anaklia deep-sea port. She also raised concerns about the Georgian Dream government’s growing alignment with Russia, questioning whether Tbilisi risks becoming a Russian puppet regime.
The forum, which explored Europe’s evolving defense and security architectures, focused on key transformations in transatlantic relations, NATO-EU cooperation, and Europe’s geopolitical role amid ongoing conflicts. Discussions covered the impact of the war in Ukraine, the need for a stronger European defense industry, and the new challenges posed by cyber warfare, disinformation, and strategic influence.
Tinatin Khidasheli Speaks at the Paris Security and Strategy Forum Read More »
On February 22, Tinatin Khidasheli, Chairwoman of Civic Idea, participated as an invited expert at the International Leadership and Foresight Forum in Abidjan, themed “Artificial Intelligence: Transforming Africa’s Future in the Face of Global Challenges.” The forum brought together world-renowned experts, leaders, and executives to explore AI’s role in shaping a safer, more prosperous, and sustainable future for Africa. Khidasheli contributed to Panel 2: AI and Geopolitics – Security, Power, and Data Diplomacy, offering insights into the intersection of AI, governance, and strategic decision-making in a rapidly evolving global landscape.
Organized by the Centre d’Études Prospectives (CEP), this high-level event aimed to foster dialogue on AI’s challenges and opportunities in Africa. Discussions focused on developing inclusive policies and regulatory frameworks that empower the continent while preserving its cultural identity. By engaging in critical conversations on AI governance and security, Civic Idea continues its commitment to promoting transparency, accountability, and informed policymaking on a global scale.
Tinatin Khidasheli at the International Leadership and Foresight Forum in Abidjan Read More »
1. Georgia Faces Constitutional Crisis as Ruling Party Loses Votes Necessary for Key Constitutional Issues
2. New NGO and Media regulations were announced by the Georgian Dream as a response to Western pressure and sanctions.
Tbilisi, Georgia – The ruling Georgian Dream party faces an unprecedented constitutional crisis as the country’s parliament verges on losing its ability to function. Following the mass resignation and removal of opposition MPs, the legislature now risks falling below the threshold required for critical decision-making, rendering it effectively paralyzed.
Constitutional Gridlock and the 2/3 Majority Rule
Under Georgia’s Constitution, certain critical decisions—including constitutional amendments, judicial appointments, impeachment procedures, and issues related to territorial integrity—require a supermajority of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the full Parliament.
Following the cancellation of 49 opposition MPs’ mandates of three opposition coalitions, Parliament has been reduced to just 101 active members. It is to be underlined that there is a fourth opposition party (for Georgia) with 12 mandates still legally represented. If the body loses two more members (very high probability), the ruling party will no longer be able to secure the required 2/3 threshold, rendering key governance functions inoperative.
The Constitution explicitly states:
The Immediate Crisis: Inability to Govern
On February 5, 2025, Parliament effectively voted on its own incapacity by approving the removal of opposition MPs, further undermining its ability to function. If just two more MPs step down, the ruling party will no longer control the legislative process for constitutional matters, creating an unprecedented deadlock.
Several key areas will be directly impacted by this crisis:
Political Fallout and Financial Repercussions
Beyond the legal paralysis, the opposition’s resignation has financial consequences. Under Georgian law, parties maintaining a parliamentary presence are entitled to budgetary funding. By voluntarily surrendering their mandates, opposition parties—including the Coalition for Changes, Strong Georgia, and Unity-National Movement—will lose government financing, intensifying the political standoff.
Additionally, the opposition party “for Georgia” has so far refused to apply for mandate cancellation but remains outside the parliamentary process. Giorgi Gakharia, the party’s leader, has declared that he will not legitimize a one-party Parliament, further complicating legislative proceedings.
Path Forward: New Elections as the Only Solution?
The disintegration of Parliament into an ineffective body has raised urgent questions about the necessity of new elections. In established democracies, when a Parliament becomes functionally incapacitated due to a lack of quorum for decision-making, new elections are often called to restore governance. With the Georgian Dream already unable to push through constitutional amendments, territorial integrity or border issues (requires 113 votes), as well as significant legislative changes, the political pressure for a new electoral process is mounting.
The ruling party, which has spent the past three months moving from political delegitimization to legal incapacity, now finds itself trapped in a self-created crisis. With every additional mandate lost, the government edges closer to institutional collapse, making early elections increasingly only scenario for the country to function.
New regulations and laws accounted against NGOs and Media
The Georgian Dream’s policies increasingly resemble reactive measures driven by frustration rather than strategic governance. With the majority of opposition figures now sidelined from Parliament, the ruling party has unveiled a new slew of measures targeting the bedrock of Georgian civil society. In a recent declaration, Mamuka Mdinadze, leader of the parliamentary majority, stated, “In the face of increased pressure, coercion, blackmail, and threats to our nation’s stability and sovereignty, our response will only grow firmer. We will continue to adopt both legal and political measures to ensure Georgia’s resilience against external manipulation, fortify our institutions, and safeguard our internal affairs from foreign interference.”
This rhetoric foreshadows the introduction of legislation aimed at further constricting the operating space for NGOs and the media. He said that Russian foreign agents’ law will be replaced by two new pieces of legislation, separate for NGOs and Media. He promised “translated US FARA and BBC regulation to be brought to parliament for approval.” However, given past attempts to equate Russian-style laws with American legal standards, the implications of such measures are troubling.
Moreover, Mdinadze has signaled significant alterations to the Grants Law, which has been a cornerstone of support for civil society in Georgia, surviving previous governmental efforts to curtail civic freedoms unscathed. Additionally, the government plans to withdraw from commitments made under the Open Government Partnership (OGP), including the elimination of statutory provisions that facilitate NGO participation in public decision-making processes.
While the government has left a window open for negotiation by scheduling these proposals for parliamentary consideration within the next two to three months, this appears to be a strategic move. By presenting such contentious policies, the Georgian Dream seems to be positioning itself to compel civil society leaders to engage in talks, potentially under duress, as a condition for acknowledging the legitimacy of the Parliament. Additionally, the government plans to establish a state-managed grant fund for public organizations, aiming to replace foreign funding sources with domestic alternatives.
The unfolding situation in Georgia underscores the fragility of democratic institutions when political maneuvering overrides constitutional stability. Whether this crisis results in renewed political legitimacy through elections or further governance paralysis remains to be seen.
Georgia Faces Constitutional Crisis & Crackdown on Civil Society Read More »
The Georgian Dream (GD) party has unveiled yet another wave of legislative changes designed to tighten its grip on power, ramping up penalties for a variety of offenses—many of which directly target protesters, critics, and political dissenters. Among the most striking changes:
These amendments were announced on February 3 by GD parliamentary majority leader Mamuka Mdinaradze following a political council meeting and they were approved by first reading by the parliamentary committees the same day. In his usual combative rhetoric, Mdinaradze framed the crackdown as a necessary response to what he called the ongoing efforts of “Deep State agents” to overthrow the government. He declared that the ruling party requires “the appropriate tools and means to govern the country” and to “serve the citizens.” In reality, these measures seem aimed at silencing dissent and literally curbing freedom of speech rather than addressing any genuine threats to governance.
Mdinaradze clarified that this is just the beginning: “The process will continue until the imposed norms are completely replaced by the adoption of norms necessary for the proper functioning and independence of the state.”
The New Rules of Repression
The proposed legislation includes an array of new restrictions and harsher penalties:
What This Means for Georgia
The only tool the government is left with is the power of force. They solely and heavily rely on repressive power. There is no soft power left, no arguments or convincing. The mood of dissent is increasing, and the number of those protesting magnifies every day. Georgia has been on daily protests for over two months now, and there is no sign that it will change without the government freeing political prisoners and calling for new elections.
So, Georgian Dream decided to make peaceful protests riskier as a deterrence. GD grants itself sweeping new powers to detain demonstrators, silence critics, and police online discourse massively. Students protesting in universities? Banned. Actors speaking out in theaters? Potentially criminalized. Calling a regime official a name on social media? That, too, will soon be grounds for punishment.
These measures announced just one day after peaceful demonstrations on February 2, make it clear that GD is not simply reacting to threats—it is preemptively rewriting the rulebook to eliminate any kind of resistant speech. GD’s ominous warning that “there will be a continuation” suggests that this is only the first phase of an escalating crackdown.
In essence, GD is laying the legal foundation for something much bigger: a system in which opposition is discouraged and criminalized.
GD’s New Legislation Tightens Grip on Dissent and Accelerates Dictatorship Read More »
A new report by Civic IDEA examines a key development stemming from the Sino-Georgian strategic partnership: the potential entry of Chinese banks into the Georgian market.
The report highlights recent meetings between the central banks of Georgia and China, during which the National Bank of Georgia consistently expressed interest in the presence of Chinese state-owned banks in Georgia.
It also addresses the risks and challenges linked to Chinese financial institutions, citing examples of “debt-trap diplomacy” in countries such as Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, and Montenegro.
The Road to Dependency: Chinese Banks Eyeing Georgia Read More »
A new report by Civic IDEA explores an emerging dimension of China-Georgia law enforcement cooperation: the procurement of Chinese surveillance technology by Georgian government institutions.
Drawing on publicly available data, the report examines state procurement of Chinese surveillance cameras between 2019 and 2024, revealing a growing trend in the acquisition of this technology by Georgian authorities.
The report’s final section highlights the significant challenges associated with Chinese surveillance technology, including data insecurity, vulnerability to cyber-attacks, human rights concerns, and close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. These issues have led to the banning of Chinese surveillance technology in several Western countries.
EMERGING CONCERN Chinese Surveillance Cameras in Georgia Read More »
This document was prepared by “Georgia’s European Orbit” and Human Rights’ Center of the University of Georgia based on publicly available sources, including media footage, victim testimonies, statements from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The information provided is intended for informational purposes.
The present document concerning the ongoing criminal cases is based on publicly disclosed information provided by media outlets and investigative authorities. It is subject to periodic updates in accordance with publicly available data. The document was prepared by “Georgia’s European Orbit” and Human Rights’ Center of the University of Georgia. The information provided is intended for informational purposes.
This document was prepared by “Georgia’s European Orbit” and Human Rights’ Center of the University of Georgia based on publicly available sources, including media footage, victim testimonies, statements from non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and reports from the Public Defender’s Office. The information provided is intended for informational purposes and reflects the findings of the human rights lawyers based on these sources.