Facts instead of the demagoguery of the Georgian Dream

Facts instead of the demagoguery of the Georgian Dream Read More »
We are pleased to share with you our latest research “Workers’ Rights Watch” prepared with the support of NED and Caps Unlock. It delves into the details of labour relations within eight companies affiliated with the People’s Republic of China. The analysis is based on the conclusions made by the Labor Inspection Service of Georgia in the reporting period of 2022, the media monitoring conducted by us and the violations revealed as a result of multiple interviews with the victims. The findings underscore the critical need for implementing robust measures that compel companies to adhere to labor-legal norms, so that the socio-economic or civil-political rights aren’t violated.
For further details, please find the complete report attached below. 👇
Workers’ Rights Watch Read More »
The Civil.ge article “Chinese Companies in Georgia: Sanctions, Delays, and Concerns” references Civic IDEA and its China Watch reports showcasing the misconduct of notorious Chinese companies operating in Georgia’s infrastructure sector, shady dealings with the Georgian business and political elites and threats to national security.
Below, we offer a brief excerpt from the article mentioning that.
“Civic Idea found several red flags:
China Road and Bridge Corporation – The World Bank has sanctioned the China Road and Bridge Corporation for fraudulent practices in connection with the Philippines’ National Road Improvement and Management Program (NRIMP 1). China State Construction Engineering Corporation – The World Bank blacklisted China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd. in the Philippines for its involvement in collusive practices and a corruption scandal involving the Philippine NRIMP 1 Program. In 2020, the Trump administration accused CSCEC of cyber espionage and banned U.S.-registered companies from becoming shareholders in CSCEC. HUNAN ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION GROUP CO LTD – Due to their poor construction, the 328-meter Tuojiang Bridge in China collapsed in 2009. As a result, 64 people died, 22 were injured, and the economic loss reached 39.747 million yuan (about 6 million U.S. dollars). 20 local government officials and HNRB board members were sentenced to 19 years in prison in China for bribery, malfeasance, negligence, and racketeering. In Georgia, the workers complained about poor working conditions and went on strike several times. There were deadly incidents, too, notably in June and August 2023.
Other concerning companies
The Civic Idea also points to other companies that are not part of the large projects, but whose active involvement in Georgia, they say, should be the cause of concern:
Nuctech Company Limited (serves the borders of Georgia with a scanning system) – In 2009, the European Union accused Nuctech Company Ltd. of dumping and imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of Nuctech scanning systems. In the United States, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) initially banned Nuctech’s equipment in 2014 and, based on its international experience, presented a detailed review of the company’s misdeeds in a secret document, which led to restrictions on its services by various countries. One of the last was Lithuania, whose authorities officially decided in 2021 to ban the supply of Nuctech equipment to three international airports in Lithuania.
CEFC China Energy Co – Ye Jianming, former head of CEFC China Energy Co, was charged in the US in 2017 with several crimes, including bribery. In 2018, the Chinese state investment company took control of CEFC’s foreign assets after Jianming’s disappearance. Despite CEFC officially declaring bankruptcy in 2020, Georgia’s government and courts, allegedly influenced by individuals tied to the businessman Ivane Chkhartishvili and Bidzina Ivanishvili, have not acknowledged the bankruptcy documents. The Poti Free Industrial Zone, owned 75% by CEFC, remains in the company’s possession.”
For more information, please visit
“Civic IDEA’s work cited by Civil.ge” Read More »
In recent days, the Chairman of the Parliament of Georgia once again attacked representatives of civil society organizations. This time, Civic Idea, Soviet Past Research Laboratory (Sovlab) and Tolerance Center of the Public Defender became the targets of the attack.
Attempts to discredit civil society organizations are taking place amidst the heavy social background, poverty and inflation, which remain the most painful and unsolvable problems for the population under the conditions of the long-term rule of Georgian Dream. Instead of offering a positive agenda to the public ahead of the 2024 parliamentary elections, the authorities are trying to run a negative anti-Western election campaign and mobilize its voters with the false rhetoric of fighting the country’s “enemies”.
It is obvious that another wave of attacks on civil society organizations by the authorities is part of the pre-election political propaganda, repeats one of the main narratives of Russian disinformation and serves the purpose of portraying civil society organizations as enemies. Unfortunately, this is not the first attempt by the ruling party to discredit civil society organizations. The authorities used similar information attack before the 2020 parliamentary elections as well. In the spring of 2023, Georgian Dream unsuccessfully tried to label all civil society organizations receiving international funding as foreign agents by passing a Russian law.
Provoking controversy in the society, using political persecution against specific people or organizations, conducting a hate campaign against them and trying to mobilize their own voters creates the impression that Georgian Dream is trying to achieve its narrow partisan goals at the expense of state interests. Hostile rhetoric towards civil society organizations contradicts both the constitutional values of a democratic state and the demand of the European Union towards taking steps against polarization.
Civil society organizations call on the authorities to stop the targeted hate campaign, to take steps for establishing partnership and business communication with them, and to refuse to instrumentalize polarization in the pre-election campaign.
Signatory organizations:
Democracy Research Institute
Rights Georgia
Eastern European Center for Multiparty Democracy (EECMD)
Green Alternative
Court Watch
Media Development Foundation (MDF)
Democracy Defenders
Liberal Academy Tbilisi
Soviet Past Research Laboratory (Sovlab)
Institute for Development of Freedom of Information (IDFI)
Georgian Young Lawyers Association (GYLA)
Georgian Charter of Journalistic Ethics
Caucasus Open Space (COS)
Center for Media, Information and Social Studies (CMIS)
Human Rights Center
Governance Monitoring Center (GMC)
Europe-Georgia Institute (EGI)
Franklin Club
Doublethink Lab
On Jan. 22, Kremlin-funded Sputnik Georgia published an article quoting ruling Georgian Dream Party MP Mikhail Sarjveladze calling attention to funding links between Taiwan-based civil society organization (CSO) Doublethink Lab (DTL) and the Georgian NGO, Civic IDEA.
The article is one of many in Georgia-focused media suggesting that in receiving funding from Taiwanese organizations, including DTL, Civic IDEA undermined its impartiality and ability to conduct objective research into the People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s relationship with Georgia.
In response, DTL would like to clarify our position and the nature of the relationship, which is limited to engagement around our flagship China Index project quantifying and visualizing PRC influence globally, and a one-off grant for related research.
DTL is devoted to strengthening democratic resilience and resisting digital authoritarianism globally, and as such we independently set and control the nature and direction of our research.
One aspect of DTL’s mission is to conduct research into PRC foreign influence and interference. For example, we are currently running a project to investigate Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI) in the Indo-Pacific region. The project’s goal is to gather evidence on tactics, techniques, and procedures of FIMI, so that governments and civil society platforms can make informed decisions about the best way to handle the threats and challenges these pose.
Similarly, the China Index aims to provide data-driven insights on vectors of PRC influence, so that policymakers and CSOs can make evidence-based decisions about how to more sustainably manage their relationships with the PRC. The Index also enables stakeholders to compare the scale, nature and impact of PRC influence across regions and between countries, and provides a basis for more in-depth research.
Like many CSOs, we are an independent non-profit organization that sources funding from a diverse range of donors and sectors while taking vigorous steps to maintain the integrity and quality of our methodologies and research processes. This includes ensuring that our funders do not influence our choice of research partners, and choosing not to affiliate with governments or political parties.
In this case, the DTL-coordinated China in the World (CITW) network engaged Civic IDEA as a China Index Regional Partner (RP), covering various Eastern European and Central Asian countries, for two rounds of China Index research, in 2021 and 2023. Civic IDEA also applied via open-call for funding to conduct related. in-depth research for the CITW 2022 Community Fund, and secured a grant to do so from the CITW board.
Through the China Index, we have worked with more than 200 such individuals and institutions — RPs and their local experts involved in gathering data on PRC influence in their regions.
DTL initially selected Civic IDEA to be a China Index RP because of the outstanding quality of their work, and their expertise in studying foreign influence operations, principally those of Russia and the PRC, in the South Caucasus and Central Asia. For the forthcoming (second) iteration of the China Index, Civic IDEA again responded to the open call for RPs and was selected for similar reasons.
Civic IDEA’s anti-corruption research related to PRC companies’ activities in Georgia, particularly following the signing of a strategic partnership between the two countries in July 2023, is of critical importance to understanding the nature of PRC influence, and specifically funding allocation decisions made by Georgia’s current government and ruling party.
While DTL plays no part in funding this endeavor, we wish Civic IDEA and its partners every success in conducting their research, and continuing to advocate for stricter scrutiny and due diligence around the Georgian government’s dealings with PRC entities.
Further information on China Index methodology can be found on the China Index website and via this introductory video.
Established in 2019, Doublethink Lab (Doublethink) is a civil society organization devoted to strengthening democratic resilience and resisting digital authoritarianism. Doublethink’s strengths lie in the ability to combine a diverse set of research approaches in the social, behavioral, and computational sciences to study state-funded propaganda campaigns, psychological warfare, and related information operations. As coordinator of the China in the World (CITW) network, Doublethink seeks to foster cross-regional collaboration between academics, democracy movements, digital communities, like-minded CSOs, and experts on the People’s Republic of China. Its flagship project is the China Index.
In 2019, Doublethink Lab and partners established the China In The World (CITW) network to support and unite stakeholders researching the People’s Republic of China (PRC)’s global influence, improve cross-regional awareness of related challenges, and strengthen democratic resilience worldwide. The network coordinates publication of the China Index, the first global initiative to measure and compare the PRC’s influence in various countries.
Link 👇
To keep the public informed, we are addressing the baseless accusations propagated by the Speaker of the Parliament and endorsed by the members of the Georgian Dream party against Civic IDEA and its founder, Tinatin Khidasheli. Although our initial response to Speaker’s remarks was promptly conveyed to an attentive audience on the same day by two long TV interviews (see hyperlinks for TV Pirveli & Formula), we’ve since endured a 4-day continuous incessant, aggressive allegations and insults. In our forthcoming response, we aim to provide a more factual and less emotionally charged counterargument.
First and foremost, it is crucial to emphasize that “Civic IDEA” remains committed to uncovering any government involvement in shady dealings with the companies marred by damaged reputations, scandals, and international sanctions for corruption. We will persist in conducting thorough, evidence-based research, dedicated to keeping the public well- informed. Clearly lacking substantiated evidence, the Georgian Dream resorts to direct attacks, threats, and smear campaigns orchestrated by MPs, Tbilisi City Mayer and government controlled TV channels, as well as trolls as their primary tools. Nevertheless, we firmly believe that such tactics cannot intimidate or silence us.
We have chosen the name Civic IDEA – Civic Initiative for Democratic, Euro- Atlantic Choice, for a reason. All our projects and activities align with the objectives outlined in this title and the democratic, Euro-Atlantic aspirations of the Georgian people. Therefore, we scrutinize and assess the government’s actions that appear to distance the country from the West and align it more closely with Russia.
What we say and how the government responds:
Over the past seven years, we have consistently brought to light the government’s shady undertakings, substantiating claims of corruption with concrete facts and documents while unveiling the falsehoods and misinformation propagated by them.
1. All Chinese companies, to which the government of Georgia is granting multi- million dollar contracts, have a damaged reputation worldwide and can be found on the blacklists of various IFIs and our partner countries.The government alleges our reports are anti-state, yet it offers no response regarding engaging in contracts with sanctioned companies—just an attempt to deflect by merely sewing labels.
2. For seven years, we warned the government to sever ties with the highly discredited company “Sinohydro,” presenting numerous pieces of evidence. We highlighted the issues they caused in other countries, which we foresaw happening to us as well. Instead of providing reasoned responses, they labeled us as “enemies.” Nevertheless, the outcome unfolded precisely as we had warned. In January 2024, they had to terminate the contract with “Sinohydro”, though proving massive incompetence once again. As a result, “Sinohydro” sued the state in international arbitration, which already cost the country’s budget an additional million and a half in legal fees.
3. We have a similar situation with another company – “China Railway 23rd Bureau Group Co“, which also took the government to international arbitration in November 2023. Again, if the government had followed our advice, even once in five years, we would have avoided the problems occurring today, as well as an additional waste of budgetary funds.
4. Additionally, over the course of five years, we have consistently raised concerns regarding the contractors selected for the construction of the Rikoti Bypass. We have published several reports where we have described and substantiated the “business fraud” by these companies in different countries. We sought clarification on the rationale behind the authorities’ confidence that these contractors would conduct their work in Georgia with integrity and professionalism despite facing lawsuits and disputes on nearly every continent. Unfortunately, our warnings went unheard; instead, we were labeled as “enemies” and deemed “anti-state elements who do not have a motherland.”
In the year 2023, a series of incidents unfolded with massive landslides and parts of mountains collapsing at various construction sites. This resulted in additional costs of tens of millions to the budget, prompting the initiation of new tenders. if the government had only followed our advice and made companies to environmental assessment plans, even once in five years, we would have avoided the problems occurring today as well as an additional waste of budgetary funds.
There are dozens of such examples, and we do not even talk about the notorious high corruption case of CEFC involving current and former PMs of Georgia. Unfortunately, every time, we were found to be right and all the facts and evidence were confirmed, with which we appealed to the authorities and called for a shift in policy.
Prior to the recent bout of hysteria, we methodically laid out indisputable facts to the court of public opinion, thereby unveiling the falsehoods and manipulation at play. We emphasized that, despite the government’s continuous demagoguery, Chinese investments in Georgia remain minimal. Over the last decade, the PRC has frequently failed to secure a spot in the top ten investors, contributing only 2 to 5 percent to the overall investment portfolio (based on our analysis derived solely from the National Statistics Office of Georgia). The strategic partnership, declared in July, is essentially political, and regardless of the insult and threats from the various officials of the Georgian Dream party at various levels, it cannot magically transform into a remarkable and prosperous economic upswing.
Finally, we would like to advise Ivanishvili’s puppets, before they shoot arrows at territorial integrity, to first look at the strategic partnership statement with the PRC, where, for some reason, the Russian occupation was completely “overlooked”. Furthermore, they should delve into the PRC voting at the UN Georgia IDP resolution. We are confident that many of them may not be familiar with this topic and will find it quite surprising – a matter we have previously discussed in our writings.
Why did the speaker of the parliament and the parliamentary majority get angry? Why now, in January 2024, when Civic IDEA has been exposing the alleged corrupt ties between the government and Chinese companies, along with the Prime Minister’s political corruption, for seven years?
There is a simple answer to this question – Anaklia Deep Sea Port.
It appears that the government is currently working on the decision to grant the Anaklia port tender to the Chinese company. Consequently, they are well aware of the anticipated public discontent stemming from such a choice and, in their view, are taking preemptive measures. The Georgian Dream acknowledges that Civic IDEA stands as the sole organization in the country dedicated to combating strategic corruption and safeguarding the nation’s strategic interests for the past seven years. Consequently, they anticipate the most informed and justified criticism from us. Our perspectives are not only heard and read domestically but also resonate with our Western partners. Hence, the GD members are laying the groundwork to dismiss our criticism by labeling us “Taiwan lobbyists or agents” rather than providing substantive arguments in response.
Additionally, we urge Mikheil Sarjveladze1 to provide a precise explanation of his threat regarding “the Georgian authorities not accepting the financing of a Georgian organization from Taiwan… it is against the vital interests of the state and we will not tolerate such a behaviors under no circumstances.” We are waiting for his answer and explanations of what it means and how to understand ” not tolerate such a behaviors under no circumstances.” It constitutes a clear threat to an independent civil society organization, and it is particularly sad when such a statement comes from the chairman of the Human Rights Committee. Unsurprisingly, one of the primary propaganda outlets for the Kremlin, “Sputnik,” has eagerly disseminated this information. Let us remind you that the head of “Civic IDEA” was the only high-ranking official in the country whose dismissal was openly demanded by the Kremlin, on a deputy MFA press conference (refer to Karasin’s press conference in the spring of 2016). This is how Mr. Karasin spoke about than Georgia’s Defence Minister Tinatin Khidasheli addressing PM’s Special envoy – “Georgia’s Defense Minister urged the entire world that the civilized nations should unite against the Russian threat. We do not endorse such statements. We hold back, but our patience also has its limits.”
Here we must state unequivocally:
– Surprisingly enough, we are not the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, therefore we do not express a position on the recognition or non-recognition of any state;
– Thus neither Civic IDEA nor Tinatin Khidasheli has ever made a statement about the recognition of Taiwan’s independence;
– Surprisingly enough, we no longer at the Ministry of Defense either, so any insinuation that Tinatin Khidasheli had access to secret documents eight years ago (incidentally unrelated to Taiwan or the PRC, as they were not among the ministry’s partners at that time) is completely irrelevant to our current activities. Bringing up this topic out of context is a standard propaganda tactic.
– We are also engaged in educational activities and can educate interested MPs on the difference between “one China policy” and “one China principle”, positions and recognitions aired by Georgia’s western partners;
– Yes, Civic IDEA has partnership relations with organizations in Taiwan. Neither Imedi TV nor Rustavi 2 discovered this information. It is completely open and available on our website. Also, on our webpage, you will read that the partners of the international conference, which we hosted in Tbilisi in October 2023 and was attended by leading experts from more than 30 countries, were the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, together with the NATO Contact-Point Embassies in Georgia, the Embassy of Great Britain, the Embassy of Poland, the Visegrad Fund, FNF and NED.
– Furthermore, our webpage contains details about our visits to Taiwan and the panel discussions we conducted there. A more attentive read of our page would reveal that December 2023 was not our only or first visit to Taiwan.
– Finally, also on our page, you would have seen that we are participating in a very large international project run by our Taiwanese partner DTL, where Civic IDEA, leveraging the reputation and professionalism of its experts, was tasked to conduct research and analysis of the PRC activities in 13 countries across the globe.
– Finally, the statement “Taiwan is financing you” is incorrect. Unlike countries such as the Netherlands, Norway, the UK, and the USA, where Civic IDEA has received direct funding from their respective governments, we have never received financial support from the Taiwanese state. Our collaborations have been with private, independent organizations in Taiwan, and we genuinely anticipate that this partnership will endure in the future. If our proposed initiatives receive support and approval again, these organizations will allocate funding accordingly.
On July 31, 2023, during the official visit of Georgian PM Irakli Gharibashvili to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), a Sino-Georgian strategic partnership agreement was formally established. Under the terms of this agreement, Georgia pledges its full support to all initiatives put forth by Xi Jinping and expresses its readiness to engage actively. This surprising turn of events undermines the nation’s ambitions to align with Euro-Atlantic partnerships and could pose long-term security risks. There is no doubt among the Western academia and the security community that in the era of Great Power Competition, the initiatives launched by China are aimed at revising the existing global international order and establishing alternative, Sinocentric foreign policy relations, where China’s domestic authoritarianism or aggressive foreign policy will remain immune to the resulting international reactions.
Against this backdrop, it is crucial to understand the role and function of each individual initiative in achieving China’s above-mentioned ultimate goals. For this purpose, the “Civic Idea” has prepared a series of analytical blogs where China’s initiatives are analyzed.
Assessing Georgia’s strategic partnership within the context of Chinese global politics requires a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced terminology employed by the Chinese government in delineating its priorities concerning partnerships with other nations. The categorization of a “comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership” signifies a substantial level of connection and alignment of interests between China and partner nations, albeit not always guaranteeing preferential treatment. Notably, China designates varying partnership tiers, with its closest allies like Russia and Pakistan characterized by terms such as ‘coordination for a new era’ and ‘all-weather partnership,’ respectively. Beyond these highest-level partnerships, China upholds a spectrum of relationships, including Comprehensive Strategic Partnerships and Strategic and Cooperative Partnerships tailored to enhance bilateral ties. For instance, among its 41 Comprehensive Strategic Partners, Kazakhstan (Permanent Comprehensive Strategic Partnership) is a significant partner, emphasizing notably close bilateral relations. Additionally, China maintains strategic partnerships with 23 countries, including Canada, Djibouti, Nigeria, Sudan, and Ukraine, with the recent addition of Georgia. While these partnerships signify strategic interests, distinctions emerge when examining bilateral agreements between the listed strategic partners and Georgia, revealing notable differences in their respective dynamics and scope.
The blog series provided by Civic IDEA scrutinizes Georgia’s position in the global political landscape through its strategic partnership with the PRC. Our goal is to evaluate and compare Georgia’s situation with that of other states aligned with China, seeking to identify prevailing trends. Our research is divided into several parts, starting with an exploration of the political domain. This involves examining the “One China Principle” and assertions regarding territorial integrity made by both China and its partnering nations, contrasting them with Georgia’s stance. Following this, the study will delve into global initiatives endorsed by China, assessing Georgia’s involvement compared to other nation-states. One separate study will be devoted to the economic domain, with a primary focus on the Belt and Road Initiative. This will provide a closer look at Georgia’s participation, contrasting it with other collaborating countries. Overall, our blogs aim to offer a comprehensive understanding of Georgia’s strategic alignment within its partnership with China and shed light on its broader implications in global politics.
For more information, please see the full report below 👇
ASSESSMENT OF GEORGIA’S STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP STATEMENT WITH THE PRC Read More »
Following the publication of the Sino Georgian strategic cooperation statement, discussions on the ups and downs of this document have become a focal point in the Georgian media. This is not surprising since the issue concerns one of the largest and most ambitious states in the world, and its foreign policy moves are constantly at the center of attention.
Yet, a quick look at the China-related stories in the Georgian media highlights a distinct line of internal political resistance and the particular media outlet’s political inclination inclination. Yet due to the limited availability of information in Georgian, people form their perceptions of China based solely on what their chosen media source conveys.
In order to spread propaganda messages and narratives crafted by the Chinese Communist Party, dedicated programs air on various channels from time to time, exclusively featuring news about the People’s Republic of China. Recently, these programs incorporated exclusive interviews with the Chinese ambassador, directly conveying the agenda and objectives of the propaganda. Georgian Dream MPs and propagandists echo the narratives of the Chinese Communist Party with remarkable precision. “The fascination by economic cooperation with China” is one of their favorite talking points, and they repeat with absolute conviction that only “fools refuse” investments from China, for which the Georgian government works tirelessly.
Hereby, we need to emphasize that genuine success in economic relations can be gauged by a surge in direct investments and heightened interest from numerous companies entering the country, resulting in the creation of additional jobs and increased incomes fueled by external capital. It’s important to note that when observing the infrastructure developments such as roads, bridges, and tunnels in Georgia, a substantial portion of the funding originates from the Georgian taxpayers, specifically allocated in the state budget. These Chinese companies execute projects at the Georgian nations’ behest, being funded and directed by the Georgian government. As a result, their involvement has no correlation with the “growing” economic cooperation and the “enhanced economic appeal” of the country, which is primarily attributed to the successful work of the government.
The truth is best reflected by official statistics, and nothing is more accurate and reliable than that. Without any additional explanations and interpretations, we present the data published by the Department of Statistics of Georgia over the years regarding foreign direct investments. This data unmistakably illustrates the government’s complete failure to attract Chinese investments, particularly in contrast to the lofty claims of significant interest and “immeasurably deepened” relations.
FDI from PRC
2010 – 2022 in thousands USD
As can be clearly seen in the present table, China’s investments in the country are so insignificant and meaningless that it is impossible even to consider them seriously. Meanwhile, in the wake of the government’s “effective steps”, even those minor investments are falling year by year. For example, in recent years, investments have decreased almost twice compared to 2018. The benchmark for 2020 and 2021 is simply negative. Naturally, the main argument of the opponents regarding the years 2020 and 2021 starts with the “COVID-19” pandemic, although the pandemic did not prevent Georgia’s real strategic partners from investing in the country. See the corresponding table.
FDI by countries
compared to the PRC.
2020 – 2021 in thousands USD
The share of a country with a huge and “most successful” economy in Georgia’s investment basket is extremely small, and the government’s policy, which promises huge results, has led nowhere since 2016. Investments made by the People’s Republic of China were definitely characterized by growth; in 2013, it exceeded 100 Million USD, and in the following year, 2014, it doubled and reached 221 million USD. However, after that, a sharp decrease began, and its average figure is a completely symbolic and meaningless reality. The table below clearly shows the dynamics of 2011-2022:
The share of PRC
FDI to Georgia.
2011 – 2022
The truth is that, China does not appear among the top 10 major investors in Georgia during the tenure of the “Georgian Dream” party in government:
Top 10 countries by FDI to Georgia
2015 – 2022
The PRC is not among them.
in thousands USD
Mathematics is the best friend for unveiling the truth. The numbers do not lie and do not perfectly describe the partnership, interests interests, and foreign policy objectives of states.
A drop in the ocean Chinese investments in Georgia Read More »
On December 5-7, the Civic IDEA team participated in the China In The World Summit 2023, organized by the Taiwanese Non-governmental organization Doublethink Lab in Taipei, Taiwan.
Civic IDEA’s Senior Researcher Ani Kintsurashvili and Executive Assistant Salome Svanidze, together with Danil Bekturganov, CEO of “Civil Expertise” Kazakhstan, conducted a session on “Influence and Powerplay amid the Russia- Ukraine war: Is it possible for the PRC to dominate Central Asia?”.
The discussion delved into the nuanced role that China plays in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, oscillating between projecting itself as a “peacemaker” and indirectly supporting Russia. This dual role has added complexity to China’s global diplomacy and had a profound impact on the shifting geopolitical dynamics in Eurasia. Against the backdrop of Central Asian states delicately balancing between Russia and the West, the conflict accelerated the reassessment of their dependence on Moscow, presenting openings for both China and Western influences. The session also anticipated Kazakhstan’s distinctive and assertive stance against Russia, revealing variations in responses among the Central Asian Republics.
Civic IDEA at CITW 2023 Read More »