Newswire

Tensions on the Senkaku Island Fuel China–Japan Clash

Newswire / /

China-Japan relations have entered a sharply strained phase as maritime confrontations, diplomatic protests, and public debate over Taiwan are reshaping the regional security landscape. Developments in mid-November – including Chinese Coast Guard activity near the disputed Senkaku Islands, Beijing’s advisory discouraging travel to Japan – reflect the growing fragility of ties between Asia’s two largest economies.

On November 16, a formation of China Coast Guard ships sailed through waters around the Japan-administered Senkaku Islands, a contested territory that China also claims. Beijing described the patrol as “rights protection,” a phrase it commonly uses to justify operations in disputed areas. 

The operation came days after Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi suggested that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan – language that could justify the use of collective self-defense and military intervention. Beijing responded with anger, demanding Tokyo retract the remarks and summoning Japan’s ambassador in protest.

The latest Chinese patrol marks one of the more visible demonstrations of Beijing’s displeasure. Japanese officials lodged a fresh diplomatic complaint, calling the Coast Guard’s activities a violation of Japan’s sovereignty.

Further complicating relations, China issued a warning urging its citizens to avoid traveling to Japan. Although Beijing did not explicitly link the advisory to political tensions, the move closely followed Takaichi’s comments on Taiwan.

Japan’s government said it has “strongly asked” China to take appropriate steps and clarify its stance, expressing concern that the advisory could damage people-to-people ties at a time when diplomacy is already strained. Some Chinese airlines have since offered fee waivers or refunds for travelers cancelling trips to Japan.

The intensifying standoff comes as Japanese public opinion remains sharply divided over the country’s potential military role in a Taiwan crisis. According to a Kyodo News poll released on November 16, 48.8% of respondents support Japan exercising its right to collective self-defense if China attacks Taiwan, while 44.2% oppose such involvement.

At the same time, 60.4% back Prime Minister Takaichi’s plan to accelerate defense spending to 2% of GDP, reflecting growing concern about regional security even as voters disagree on how far Japan should go in responding to Chinese aggression.

Despite rising tensions with Beijing, Takaichi’s administration continues to enjoy strong domestic support, with approval ratings climbing nearly six points in the latest survey.

The convergence of maritime incidents, diplomatic warnings, and debates over defense policy underscores how delicate the China-Japan relationship has become. China’s actions around the Senkaku Islands, combined with its travel advisory and assertive reactions to Japanese political statements, signal a willingness to apply both hard and soft pressure.

For Japan, finding the right balance between strengthening national security and preventing further deterioration in relations with its largest trading partner remains a significant challenge.

As both nations adopt firmer postures – with China expanding military activities and Japan accelerating defense plans – analysts warn that the risk of miscalculation is rising. Without sustained dialogue, even routine encounters at sea or politically charged comments on Taiwan could push the region closer to crisis.

Tensions on the Senkaku Island Fuel China–Japan Clash Read More »

Spain and China Strengthen Ties

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

since the state visit of the Spanish Monarch to China. Throughout the visit, both countries emphasized the commitment to strengthening economic and diplomatic cooperation amid the tensions between China and Europe.

During the visit, Xi Jinping and Felipe signed the agreements concerning trade, science and technology, education, and language exchange. Both leaders announced cooperation in renewable energy, green technology, and Artificial Intelligence, which is crucial for Spain’s current energy transition. Xi Jinping noted that China is prepared to strengthen its strategic partnership with Spain.

​China remains Spain’s largest trade partner outside the EU, while Spain continues to be one of the key European partners for China. In 2023, bilateral trade exceeded $50 billion, and Chinese investments in Spain reached $1.7 billion. Xi Jinping underscored 50 years of diplomatic relations between the two countries and also added that the two nations have “respected and supported each other, contributing to each other’s success”.

King Felipe VI praised China’s role in Spain’s economic development and green transformation, noting that Chinese investments have played a vital part in Spain’s renewable energy and production. Amidst global trade tensions and the Ukraine war, Spain’s engagement with China is growing; Madrid has positioned itself as one of Europe’s most pragmatic partners with Beijing.

​Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez visited China six months earlier. He called for “more balanced relations between the European Union and China.” Madrid continues to cooperate in technology and trade while navigating EU concerns over security and market imbalances.

​The three-day visit included stops in Chengdu and Sichuan province, where Felipe attended the China-Spain Business forum and met Spanish companies operating in the region. The event’s goal was to showcase expanded business ties and joint ventures in green hydrogen and electric battery production.

​Global Times described China-Spain relations as “a model of International cooperation”, emphasizing the need for peace, trade, tourism, and cultural exchange. Over 40 Spanish companies are operating in Chengdu, and Sichuan Airlines recently launched a direct flight to Madrid.

​The visit underlines the challenge Europe faces, where several member states are establishing close ties with China. Previously, there was criticism from the US about Spain’s close ties with China, while Brussels is debating technology security. While Spain is deepening ties with China, Xi Jinping demonstrates his ability to influence trade and technology in Europe.

Author: Mariam Sanadze

Spain and China Strengthen Ties Read More »

Japan-China Diplomatic Tensions Over the Taiwan Issue

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

Last Week, during a parliamentary committee, Japan’s newly elected Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi was asked about possible scenarios that might provoke the deployment of Japan’s self-defense forces. Her response triggered China’s outrage. In particular, Sanae Takaichi said that China’s attack on Taiwan could be considered “a survival-threatening situation”, “an existential threat” for Japan. It is noteworthy to say that the Japanese island of Yonaguni lies just 100km from Taiwan, so China’s possible military attack on Taiwan and presence of its warships in the East China Sea might be concerning for Japan.

The prime minister pointed out specific scenarios, such as a Chinese naval blockade of Taiwan or actions deterring the arrival of U.S. forces, saying that these cases “by all means” would qualify as situations in which Japan might deploy its self-defense forces under the 2015 law regarding collective self-defense.

According to its postwar constitution, Japan is prohibited from using force to resolve international disputes, but the above-mentioned law, which was passed during Shinzo Abe’s tenure, permits Japan to exercise military action in defense of allies (for example, the U.S) if the situation threatens Japan’s survival.

Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan were met with harsh criticism by Chinese representatives. “We have no choice but to cut off that dirty neck that has been lunged at us without hesitation. Are you ready?”- China’s consul general in Osaka, Xue Jian, posted on X. This post was later deleted, but it stirred up diplomatic tension between China and Japan. Xue’s post was deemed “extremely inappropriate” by Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara, requesting an explanation from China.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian described Xue’s post as a message reflecting his personal views, but at the same time justified it as a response to “the erroneous and dangerous remarks that attempt to separate Taiwan from China’s territory and advocate military intervention in the Taiwan Strait.” He also rhetorically asked: “Is Japan attempting to challenge China’s core interests and obstruct the great cause of China’s reunification?” “Where does Japan intend to take China-Japan relations?”.

It is noteworthy that since taking office, this is not the first time Sanae Takaichi has triggered Chinese outrage. China was angered by her meeting with Lin Hsin-I, a senior adviser of the presidential office of Taiwan, earlier this month during the APEC summit in South Korea. Takaichi posted photos of herself and Lin Hsin-I on social media, and in the comments section, she expressed hope that “practical cooperation between Japan and Taiwan will deepen”. China condemned those actions as “egregious in nature and impact”; “severely violating the one-China principle, the spirit of the four political documents between China and Japan, and basic norms of international relations”.

It must also be said that before meeting Lin Hsin-I, Takaichi also held a meeting with Chinese president Xi Jinping, where both country leaders agreed on their intentions to develop constructive and stable ties between China and Japan, but taking into consideration recent events, China-Japan relations during Takaichi’s tenure might not be smooth or stable.

Author: Salome Markhvashvili

Japan-China Diplomatic Tensions Over the Taiwan Issue Read More »

US-China Trade Truce: Easing Tariffs, FBI Visit, and a New Phase in the Fight Against Fentanyl  

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

After years of escalating tariffs and tense negotiations, the United States and China appear to be entering a cautious new phase in their trade relationship. Following a meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October, both sides signaled readiness to de-escalate – though the long-term stability of this fragile truce remains uncertain.

President Trump announced an immediate end to a portion of tariffs previously imposed on Chinese goods, particularly those linked to Beijing’s alleged failure to stop the export of chemicals used in fentanyl production. The decision marked the first tangible gesture of de-escalation since talks resumed earlier this year.

However, uncertainty lingers. U.S. officials have yet to clarify which other duties will remain or at what levels. For months, both countries had threatened tariffs exceeding 100% on each other’s exports, casting a long shadow over global supply chains and investor confidence.

A significant new development added a law-enforcement layer to the economic talks. FBI Director Christopher Wray made an unannounced visit to Beijing in early November – a rare trip marking the highest-level law-enforcement contact between the two nations in years.

Sources familiar with the talks said Wray met with senior Chinese public-security and foreign-affairs officials to discuss cooperation on curbing the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals – substances that U.S. authorities say are fueling America’s opioid crisis. The FBI chief reportedly spent two days in Beijing, arriving on a Friday evening and holding closed-door meetings throughout Saturday before departing on Sunday morning.

During these discussions, both sides agreed to explore the creation of a joint working mechanism between the FBI and China’s Ministry of Public Security aimed at improving data sharing, tracing chemical exports, and coordinating law-enforcement operations targeting smuggling networks.

At the same time, during China’s largest import Expo, American exhibitors reported a renewed sense of optimism that the “worst of the trade war is over.” U.S. companies, from agricultural exporters to tech manufacturers, showcased their products and voiced expectations that trade channels might soon reopen more freely.

This new phase represents neither victory nor defeat for either side. Instead, it reflects a pragmatic pause in a conflict that has reshaped global trade dynamics. The limited tariff rollback and renewed diplomatic tone suggest a shared recognition that continued escalation benefits no one. Yet, without a comprehensive agreement addressing the root causes of friction, this truce may prove temporary.

Author: Nia Kokhreidze

US-China Trade Truce: Easing Tariffs, FBI Visit, and a New Phase in the Fight Against Fentanyl   Read More »

China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, enters service

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

China’s latest and most capable aircraft carrier, the Fujian, has officially entered into service, marking a significant step forward for Beijing in solidifying its position among global naval powers and catching up with the United States in terms of naval supremacy. The Fujian is China’s third and most advanced vessel, equipped with electromagnetic catapults (EMALS). This innovative technology allows planes to take off with heavier weapon and fuel loads, so they can strike enemy targets at greater distances, making it more powerful than China’s first two Russian-designed carriers, the Liaoning and the Shandong.

The Fujian entered service on Wednesday in Hainan province at a grand ceremony, which is considered the greatest achievement of China’s military modernization. This event makes China the second country in the world, after the US, to operate an aircraft carrier equipped with EMALS technology. It is also the world’s largest conventionally powered warship, underscoring China’s engineering achievements.

President Xi Jinping personally attended the commissioning and flag-presenting ceremony at a military port in Sanya. Xi Jinping inspected the vessel and was informed about its capabilities and performance data. According to state media, Xi Jinping personally made the decision to adopt the electromagnetic catapult technology.

According to Zhang Junshe, a Chinese military expert, the transfer of Fujian to the naval fleet conditions the shift of the PLA Navy forces from coastal defense to far seas defense, with which China officially enters the era of three aircraft carriers. According to him, this step grants the fleet several key advantages. First of all, aircraft can take off with full fuel and ammunition, which increases the combat radius. In addition, the frequency of aircraft launch from the carrier significantly increases. Experts suggest that Fujian and Shandong may be deployed in the same port facing the South China Sea. This will facilitate the creation of a dual-carrier group and strategically deter the forces advocating for “Taiwan independence.” 

Although China has the world’s largest navy in terms of the number of ships, and the Fujian, with a mass of 80,000 tons, is the closest thing afloat to the US Navy’s Nimitz-class carriers, analysts say it still has a difficult path ahead before achieving full operational readiness. Because it is conventionally fueled (diesel-powered), the Fujian has a limited operating range, unlike the nuclear-powered carriers of the US. Experts estimate that due to the configuration of the flight deck, its air operations rate may only be 60% compared to what a 50-year-old US aircraft carrier achieves. China is already building a fourth carrier, which is expected to be nuclear-powered and also employ EMALS technology.

Author: Mariam Macharashvili

 

China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, enters service Read More »

Statement by the Chinese Ambassador to the U.S. Regarding Taiwan

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

Following the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, China once again reaffirmed the importance of its “red lines,” which it deems unacceptable for the United States and other countries to cross.

During a virtual meeting held in Shanghai that brought together American and Chinese business representatives, China’s ambassador discussed four key “red lines” — Taiwan, democracy and human rights, political path and system choice, and the right to development — which China firmly expects its partner countries to respect. The ambassador stated: “We hope that the United States will avoid crossing these red lines and thereby prevent the emergence of problems.”

The ambassador emphasized the ongoing negotiations between China and the United States, noting that the process requires “mutual respect for each other’s core interests.”

These four “red lines” have long been considered highly sensitive issues for China. Consequently, Washington’s unofficial relations with Taipei remain a major source of tension in U.S.–China relations. Moreover, periodic U.S. criticism of human rights violations in China further intensifies the strain between the two countries.

Despite the tensions, Donald Trump stated that the issue of Taiwan was not discussed during the October 30 meeting. However, following the meeting between Xi Jinping and Trump, China made it clear that respect for and adherence to its “red lines” remain essential conditions for maintaining stable bilateral relations.

Author: Keti Abuladze

Statement by the Chinese Ambassador to the U.S. Regarding Taiwan Read More »

Netherlands–China Chip Dispute

Newswire / /

In September 2024, the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs seized control of the Dutch-based chipmaker, which in 2018 was purchased by partially state-owned Chinese electronics company – Wingtech Technology. The Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs invoked the Goods Availability Act and explained that Nexperia’s governance and serious shortcomings “posed a threat to the continuity and safeguarding on Dutch and European soil of crucial technological knowledge and capabilities”.

According to the Dutch government, its control over Nexperia means that “company decisions may be blocked or reversed by the Minister of Economic Affairs if they are (potentially) harmful to the interests of the company, to its future as a Dutch and European enterprise, and/or to the preservation of this critical value chain for Europe.”

When talking about Nexperia and its parent company Wingtech Technology, it is noteworthy to mention that last year the U.S Commerce Department included Wingtech on its “entity list”, which is a list of companies perceived as entities that might pose a risk to national security and are therefore subject to export controls. In addition, in 2023, the British government didn’t allow Nexperia to buy a Wales-based chipmaker factory again due to national security concerns. All this reflects general geopolitical tensions between China and the West concerning advanced technologies like computer chips.

Back in 2024, after the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs seized control of Nexperia, Wingtech published a social media post that criticized the ministry’s decisions and said that the company itself “firmly opposes the politicization of commercial matters” and  “an excessive intervention based on geopolitical bias rather than a fact-based risk assessment based on the unfounded pretext of national security.” In addition, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Lin Jian also commented that “relevant countries should genuinely uphold market principles and avoid politicizing economic and trade issues.”

China’s direct response was to block the re-export of Nexperia chips completed in its Chinese factories to Europe. Besides, according to Nexperia’s Chinese-based factory, the Dutch-based factory stopped supplying wafers to its Chinese factory, which further complicated the situation and made it harder to produce finished semiconductors. All this caused serious concerns among European carmakers, since these chips are crucial for building cars.

It’s important to note that approximately 70% of Nexperia chips made in Europe are sent to China to be completed and re-exported to other countries. Last month, the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (ACEA) said that if the Chinese ban was not lifted, Nexperia chip supplies would run out in weeks. Additionally, companies like Volvo Cars and Volkswagen warned that this shortage could lead to temporary shutdowns of their factories.

This week, China’s Commerce Ministry said in a statement that “the Netherlands should bear full responsibility” because its actions “have created turmoil and chaos in the global semiconductor supply chain”.

According to the White House, the topic of chips was also discussed during the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea last week. Beijing has said that it will relax its export ban on automotive computer chips as part of a future trade deal between the U.S and China.

Netherlands–China Chip Dispute Read More »

China is accused of violating a British university’s academic freedom

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

China is attempting to paralyse the research of Professor Laura Murphy at the UK’s Sheffield Hallam University. The research focuses on the forced labour of Uyghur Muslims (a Turkic-speaking Muslim ethnic minority in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region) in China’s northwestern Xinjiang region.

The practice of pressure from the Chinese side has been ongoing for two years, including contacts with individual university staff members by individuals who identified themselves as representatives of China’s national security service. A significant fact is that access to the university’s website was also blocked from China.

The United Kingdom views this issue not only as a serious violation of human rights but has also classified the events as a breach of state sovereignty and national interest. Despite this, the university suspended the research after two years of pressure.

The role of the university administration itself is also a critical factor, as its directives prevented Professor Murphy from continuing her research process on the forced labour of Muslims. The professor initiated legal action against the university, citing the violation of her individual academic freedom.

“The university administration directly negotiated with a foreign intelligence service. They traded the professor’s academic freedom for the renewal of website access,” stated Professor Murphy.

It is important to note that many Chinese students continued their studies at the university, and naturally, this process was halted after the website access was restricted.

The Chinese Embassy in London informed the BBC that “the Helena Kennedy Centre at Sheffield Hallam University published a report containing false information on Xinjiang.” The Embassy further alleged that “some authors of these reports were found to have received funding from US agencies.” Professor Murphy, speaking to the BBC, confirmed she received funding from the US National Endowment for the Humanities, which was intended to produce an autobiographical account from individuals involved in forced labour.

The pressure reached an active phase in 2024. On April 18, 2024, “three officers from the national security service” visited the Sheffield Hallam office in China. A two-hour interrogation ensued regarding the future and current research of the Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice (HKC), as Professor Murphy was conducting her research under the HKC’s auspices.

This came after the Centre published a December 2023 study exposing the exploitation of individuals in the garment manufacturing and supply process in the Xinjiang region. The report named the Hong Kong-based company Smart Shirts Ltd, which subsequently filed a libel lawsuit against the university. The London High Court issued a preliminary finding that the report indeed contained financially damaging content for the company, though the validity of the underlying information was not questioned. Professor Murphy’s reputation is globally significant. Her research was highly regarded by the UK, Canada, and Australia parliaments, and often served as a basis for policy recommendations. In 2023, Murphy worked at the US Department of Homeland Security, participating in the implementation of the Uyghur Forced Labour Prevention Act. She has consistently focused on researching forced labour practices throughout these years.

During her absence, Sheffield Hallam University decided in August 2024 to discontinue the research project on forced labour, despite the project still being externally funded. Murphy was informed of this decision upon her return. The university validated its decision by citing pressure from security services, arguing that the safety of staff members in both the UK and China was at risk. To resolve the issue, it is vital to consider the valid arguments of both sides. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 mandates universities to protect the academic freedom of students and professors, which primarily includes freedom of speech.

For Murphy, the university traded her personal freedom for commercial interests. However, university representatives stated that Chinese students were never a primary market for Sheffield Hallam, as only 73 students from China were recorded in the 2024–2025 academic year. Meanwhile, the Chinese Embassy noted that over 200,000 Chinese students study in the UK. Baroness Helena Kennedy, who is herself sanctioned by China over her Xinjiang statements, observed that due to financial crises, British universities have become dependent on the revenue from Chinese students, making them vulnerable to Chinese pressure.

Author: Mariam Arabashvili 

China is accused of violating a British university’s academic freedom Read More »

Taiwan Rejects China’s “One Country, Two Systems” Offer

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

Taiwan will not accept China’s proposal to reunify under the “one country, two systems” model and is prepared to defend its freedom and democracy, President Lai Ching-te declared on October 31, firmly rejecting Beijing’s latest attempt to bring the island under its control.

Earlier this week, China stated that it “does not rule out the use of force” against Taiwan – a remark that stands in stark contrast to the more conciliatory tone in recent state media reports, which had emphasized promises of “peaceful governance” similar to arrangements in Hong Kong and Macau.

Speaking at a military base in Hukou, President Lai addressed troops amid this politically tense backdrop, stressing that “true and lasting peace can only be secured through strength and defense readiness.”

“We must uphold the status quo with dignity and determination, firmly oppose annexation, aggression, and forced unification,” Lai said. He announced that Taiwan plans to raise defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2030 in order to strengthen its security amid China’s growing military threat.

Defending this strategy, Lai underlined that “the Taiwanese people’s protection of sovereignty and democratic way of life should not be seen as a provocation. Investing in national defense means investing in peace.” Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office has not yet commented on the president’s remarks.

Lai’s visit to Hukou coincided with a ceremony marking the delivery of a new battalion of M1A2T Abrams tanks, manufactured by U.S. defense company General Dynamics Land Systems. So far, Taiwan has received 80 out of 108 ordered tanks – a sign that the island remains a focal point in the intensifying U.S.-China rivalry, a confrontation that increasingly transcends regional boundaries and carries global implications.

Meanwhile, at the recent U.S.-China summit in Busan, the issue of Taiwan was conspicuously absent from public discussion. Neither Xi Jinping nor Donald Trump mentioned the topic, which may suggest a temporary, pragmatic understanding aimed at easing tensions. Yet, as Washington continues to bolster Taiwan’s defense capabilities and Beijing refuses to renounce the use of force, this diplomatic silence appears more like a strategic pause than a sign of genuine reconciliation.

Taiwan Rejects China’s “One Country, Two Systems” Offer Read More »

Meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea

Newswire, ერთი ახალი ამბავი / /

Following the meeting held on October 30, Donald Trump announced that he would sign a trade agreement with Chinese President Xi Jinping “very soon.” The meeting also covered the topic of reducing tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump told reporters that they agreed to lower the tariff on fentanyl imports from 20% to 10%. The level of tariffs imposed on Chinese products also dropped from 57% to 47%. It is noteworthy that the parties did not discuss Taiwan during the meeting.

Despite the fact that a trade deal was not signed after the meeting, a significant consensus on economic issues was reached during the meeting, including the resolution of disagreements related to rare earths. China announced that export control measures on critical minerals should be suspended for one year. In exchange for the tariff reductions, the Chinese side will purchase an “enormous amount” of American soybeans, which is a step forward for the US, as farmers were losing billions of dollars from crop sales to China due to trade disputes.

President Xi emphasized that “dialogue is better than confrontation.“ He called for deepening communication and named potential areas for cooperation:

  • Combating illegal immigration and telecommunication fraud
  • Money laundering
  • Artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Response to infectious diseases

The leaders also discussed the issue of Ukraine during the meeting. Trump and Xi Jinping agreed to cooperate to facilitate the end of the conflict.

The leaders agreed that they share a joint responsibility to address the complex problems facing the world.

Meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping in South Korea Read More »

Scroll to Top