New

Chinese Company Enters Georgia’s Renewable Energy Sector

In recent years, both Georgian Dream and Chinese officials have placed strong emphasis on cooperation in the field of new and renewable energy. On January 21, the Ambassador of China to Georgia, Zhou Qian, stated that Georgia–China cooperation “now involves more sectors and has reached a more advanced level.” As a prime example of this evolving collaboration, the ambassador highlighted the participation of a Chinese company in the Gori Wind Electropower project.

The Gori Wind Electropower project, officially known as the Ruisi Wind Farm Project, envisages the construction, development, and operation of a wind power facility with an installed capacity of 206 MW in the Gori and Kareli municipalities of Georgia. The project has been financed with an amount of 119 million USD by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

In 2024, the Chinese company Goldwind Science & Technology Co. Ltd won a state tender announced for the provision of installation and 15-year operation of 33 wind turbines. In January 2026, Goldwind completed the installation of the first turbine. According to the company, once installation is fully concluded, the wind farm will generate approximately 600 GWh of electricity annually.

The Chinese Ambassador assessed Goldwind’s success in the tender as one of the “significant achievements of Chinese companies in Georgia. From Georgia’s perspective, however, this development underscores the growing involvement of China’s major energy companies in the country’s emerging energy sector.

Goldwind Science & Technology is a Chinese transnational company that provides products and services related to clean energy infrastructure. A closer examination of the company reveals its close ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). As of September 30, 2025, part of the company’s shares were owned by state-owned entities, including Xinjiang Wind Power Co. (11.78%) and China Three Gorges Renewables Co., Ltd. (9.16%). The latter is a subsidiary of China Three Gorges Corporation, which, in January 2020, was designated as a Chinese military company by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Goldwind is also associated with another sanctioned Chinese entity, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC). In 2020, Goldwind signed a contract with XPCC to supply power to one of the organization’s settlements. XPCC is a state-owned economic and paramilitary organization that exercises control over the Xinjiang region and has been sanctioned by both the United States and the European Union due to its involvement in serious and systematic human rights abuses against Uyghur Muslim minorities in China.

The company’s management structure is likewise closely linked to the CCP. Goldwind’s founder and executive director, Wu Gang, is a member of the CCP and has been awarded a commemorative medal by the CCP Central Committee, the State Council, and the Central Military Commission. Publicly available information also indicates that Wu Gang has advocated for the CCP’s repressive policies toward Uyghurs, having participated in a Chinese government campaign promoting ideological education among ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

Within China, Goldwind’s operations have been associated with environmentally unfriendly and non-compliant practices, including illegal land occupation, excessive pollutant discharges, and noise pollution. For these violations, the company and its subsidiaries have been subjected to administrative penalties over the years, with cumulative fines amounting to 52.0991 million yuan.

On February 3, the European Union launched a formal investigation into Goldwind’s activities under the EU’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation, amid concerns that the company may have received subsidies from the Chinese government. In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce condemned the EU probe, characterizing it as “targeted” and “discriminatory.”

Concerns have also emerged regarding the safety of the company’s products. In November 2025, hazardous material, asbestos, was found in lift brake pads used across Goldwind’s wind farms in Australia. Following this discovery, access to Goldwind’s wind turbines was restricted.

Taken together, Goldwind Science & Technology’s close ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its questionable connections with sanctioned Chinese entities highlight Georgian Dream’s permissive approach toward cooperation with Chinese companies that carry controversial international reputations. Civic IDEA has repeatedly warned state institutions about the negative consequences of inadequate due-diligence practices when engaging with PRC-linked companies. The case of the Gori Wind Electropower project thus illustrates a new dimension of infrastructure development in Georgia that may be increasingly vulnerable to expanding Chinese strategic interests.

Chinese Company Enters Georgia’s Renewable Energy Sector Read More »

Behind the Barrels: Iranian Oil and Political Ties in Georgia

Civic IDEA is pleased to share its Report #2 on Iran, prepared within the framework of our ongoing monitoring of Georgia’s economic and political linkages related to Iran.

Key findings from the report include:

72 companies registered in Georgia imported Iranian oil and petroleum products in 2022–2025, based on official data and documents.

  • 15 companies are related to citizens of third countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Armenia).
  • 10 companies are related to Iranian citizens, and 2 companies have Iranian citizens among their partners as managers/shareholders.
  • 8 companies are linked to donors of the Georgian Dream party; 3 of these are winners of state tenders.
  • 8 companies have contracts with various state agencies. Managers/shareholders of 3 companies are linked to other entities that have won state contracts.
  • 5 companies are indirectly related to Georgian Dream donors — Aisi LLC, Ihlas LLC, Bakhula Motors LLC, Baza-22 LLC, Sulfeco LLC — as member organizations of the NNLE Waste Management Business Association. The association is headed by Bakur Khundadze, a donor to Georgian Dream.
  • 4 companies are indirectly connected to public/political officials and members of the Georgian Parliament, including a former Georgian Dream MP.

Read the full report:

Behind the Barrels: Iranian Oil and Political Ties in Georgia Read More »

“2026: A New Chapter for Europe” – Tinatin Khidasheli Speaks at European Parliament Panel

📍 European Parliament, Brussels

Tinatin Khidasheli, Head of Civic IDEA, participated in the high-level European forum “2026: A New Chapter for Europe” at the European Parliament in Brussels.

Tinatin spoke on the expert panel “Democratic Resilience – Common Challenges on the Path to EU Integration.” The panel examined how weakened information integrity, fragile institutions, and elections that fall short of genuine competition can erode democratic resilience in the Western Balkans. Drawing lessons from comparable experiences beyond the region, the discussion explored concrete ways the EU and its partners can support democratic standards, bolster independent media, and reinforce institutions along the path toward EU integration.

The forum featured a keynote speech by Commissioner Michael McGrath and brought together policymakers, civil society leaders, and experts to discuss actionable strategies for strengthening democracy in Europe and its neighboring regions.

“2026: A New Chapter for Europe” – Tinatin Khidasheli Speaks at European Parliament Panel Read More »

“Western funds benefit Chinese state companies and Georgia’s authoritarian regime” – Talk Georgia with Giorgi Rukhadze

Topics Discussed:
 
🟣  How Western Funds Are Benefiting Chinese State Companies and the Authoritarian Regime in Georgia
 
🟣 Why Western Money Still Flows to Georgia Despite Sanctions
 
🟣 Triangle of Money: IFIs, Corrupt Georgian Government, and Sanctioned Chinese Companies
 
🟣  How to Prevent Funding of Dictatorship
 
🟣  Status of Anaklia Deep Sea Port, Decreased U.S. Attention to Georgia, and Lost Opportunities
Check out the podcast “Talk Georgia with Giorgi Rukhadze”

“Western funds benefit Chinese state companies and Georgia’s authoritarian regime” – Talk Georgia with Giorgi Rukhadze Read More »

“The Georgian Dream” Party Legalizes Dictatorship in Georgia

“For any person, any person.”
“For any activity carried out or to be carried out with the belief or intention of exerting some influence.”

The measures announced by the Georgian Dream government yesterday go beyond a crackdown and put participation in public life an obsolete danger.

With a single legislative package, the ruling party moved to criminalize intent, association, expertise, and thought itself, placing virtually all civic, political, and intellectual life under prior state permission. The amendments unveiled on January 28 mark a decisive transition from competitive authoritarianism to an openly coercive system where the state claims the right to pre-approve who may think, organize, fund, speak, or belong.

The changes center on a significantly broadened definition of a “grant.” Under the new provisions, any transfer of funds or resources between individuals may be considered a criminal act if authorities believe it could influence government, institutions, policy, or any segment of society. This approach shifts from regulation to preemptive criminalization, targeting not only actions but also beliefs, intentions, and potential future outcomes.

The scope is deliberately boundless. Funding is criminalized not only when it is political, but when it is interpreted as political. Technical assistance, expertise, knowledge-sharing, professional services, or hiring Georgian experts by foreign entities are all reclassified as suspect “grants,” requiring government approval. Even foreign organizations funding their own Georgian branches are brought under this regime. Noncompliance carries prison sentences of up to six years; in cases framed as “money laundering related to political issues,” up to twelve.

At the same time, the amendments undermine political pluralism. Party leaders may face criminal prosecution for foreign funding violations. Individuals employed by organizations receiving more than 20% foreign funding are barred from party membership for eight years, effectively excluding many civil society professionals, researchers, journalists, and activists from political participation. 

The amendments also criminalize so-called “external lobbying.” Any exchange of resources connected, directly or indirectly, to advocacy on Georgia-related political issues abroad becomes a criminal offense. This effectively prohibits international advocacy, solidarity, and representation, legally isolating the country.

Businesses are also affected. Entrepreneurs who engage in public political activity unrelated to their core business may face significant fines, indicating that economic participation is now contingent on political neutrality.

Collectively, these measures do not seek to address abuses or enhance transparency. Instead, they are designed to suppress independent activity. Following three years of legal actions against media, NGOs, and the opposition, the government appears to be moving from managing dissent to eliminating the conditions necessary for dissent.

This legislation appears intended to instill fear rather than provide effective governance. It adopts elements of Russian-style repression and extends them through vague provisions, granting authorities broad discretionary power. When intent is criminalized and permission is required, freedom is no longer a guaranteed right but a conditional privilege. 

Yet the logic driving these laws betrays their failure. If free thought could be eliminated, it would not require prison terms. If civic commitment could be extinguished, it would not require criminal codes. Love of freedom does not disappear by statute. Neither does dedication to one’s country, nor the resolve to defend one’s beliefs.

As of today (January 29), the official text of the legislation has not yet been made public; the analysis above is based on the government’s announcement.

“The Georgian Dream” Party Legalizes Dictatorship in Georgia Read More »

Civic IDEA’s contribution referenced in the UN Universal Periodic Review of Georgia

A report prepared jointly with partners, with contributions from Civic IDEA, has been formally referenced in the United Nations Universal Periodic Review (UPR) process as Joint Submission 1 (JS1). The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights reflected the report’s findings in its official summary of stakeholders’ information for Georgia’s review, placing civil society analysis within the international human rights assessment considered by UN member states.

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a Human Rights Council mechanism that examines the human rights record of every UN member state, drawing on information from governments, civil society, and independent experts. The stakeholder summary referencing our joint submission reflects concerns related to:

  • Shrinking civic space and reported pressure on civil society organizations, journalists, and human rights defenders

  • Legislative changes affecting freedom of assembly, association, and public participation

  • Restrictions linked to laws regulating foreign funding, grants, and NGO operations

  • Allegations of excessive use of force against protesters and broader patterns of intimidation and legal pressure targeting activists

Civic IDEA will continue to monitor the UPR process as the outcome report is finalized and later adopted by the UN Human Rights Council, and remains engaged in documenting developments affecting civic space, rule of law, and the protection of fundamental rights in Georgia.

Civic IDEA’s contribution referenced in the UN Universal Periodic Review of Georgia Read More »

CHINESE COMPANIES IN GEORGIA

Civic IDEA presents a comprehensive report examining the activities of Chinese companies currently operating in Georgia and their partnerships with the “Georgian Dream” party

Since 2017, Civic IDEA has systematically monitored cooperation between Chinese companies and Georgian state institutions. This paper consolidates our key findings, drawing on both Georgia’s experience and relevant international cases; 

Alarming evidence shows that every single PRC company cooperating with Georgian Dream government has been implicated in at least one serious legal, financial, or ethical violation.

CHINESE COMPANIES IN GEORGIA Read More »

“Europe’s Money, China’s Companies, Georgia’s Authoritarians: The Paradox Undermining Western Leverage” – Tinatin Khidasheli’s New Analysis with CEIAS

Tinatin Khidasheli, Head of Civic IDEA, has published a new analytical article with CEIAS – Central European Institute of Asian Studies, examining a critical paradox shaping contemporary geopolitics and democratic resilience.

The article, titled “Europe’s Money, China’s Companies, Georgia’s Authoritarians: The Paradox Undermining Western Leverage,” explores how inconsistencies in Western economic and political strategies are weakening democratic conditionality and enabling authoritarian adaptation.

In the analysis, Khidasheli highlights three key dynamics:

  • Erosion of Western leverage through inconsistency: While democratic backsliding is often addressed through political pressure and sanctions, international development financing continues to flow with limited democratic conditions.

     

  • Opportunities for Chinese state-owned companies: Firms restricted or sanctioned in Europe and the United States are successfully securing major infrastructure contracts financed by Western-backed institutions.

     

  • Georgia as a case study of authoritarian adaptation: The country exemplifies a broader pattern in which governments combine Western capital, Chinese companies, and fragmented accountability mechanisms to pursue modernization without democratic governance.

     

“Europe’s Money, China’s Companies, Georgia’s Authoritarians: The Paradox Undermining Western Leverage” – Tinatin Khidasheli’s New Analysis with CEIAS Read More »

Jamestown Publishes Tinatin Khidasheli’s Analysis of Georgian Dream’s Shift from Western Partner to Provocateur

We would like to inform you that Jamestown has published a new article by Tinatin Khidasheli, “Georgian Dream Shifting from Western Partner to Provocateur.”

The article analyzes how Georgia’s ruling party, Georgian Dream, has shifted from a pro-Western orientation to adopting a more confrontational stance toward Western partners. Khidasheli examines the government’s increasing use of anti-Western rhetoric and conspiracy-driven narratives – such as references to the “Deep State” and the “Global War Party” – to undermine trust in Western institutions, diplomats, civil society, independent media, and domestic political opponents.

The analysis highlights how this narrative reframes Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration as a security threat, while consolidating domestic political control and deflecting responsibility for democratic backsliding onto external actors. Khidasheli also discusses the broader implications of this shift for Georgia’s strategic direction, its democratic institutions, and its relations with key Western allies.

Jamestown Publishes Tinatin Khidasheli’s Analysis of Georgian Dream’s Shift from Western Partner to Provocateur Read More »

Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall? – ENB Features Analysis by Tinatin Khidasheli

The Eastern Neighborhood Bulletin – a regional analytical platform covering political, security, and governance developments across Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus – has published a comprehensive expert review titled “Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall?”

The article brings together insights from nine leading specialists from Georgia, Europe, and the United States. Among them is Tinatin Khidasheli, Chairperson of Civic IDEA and former Minister of Defense of Georgia, who offers her analysis on the political developments surrounding the 2024 parliamentary elections and the protest movement that followed.

In her contribution, Tinatin Khidasheli highlights the critical failures of political leadership, noting that while civil society demonstrated remarkable energy and creativity, opposition parties did not transform public demand for change into a unified and credible political strategy:

“The 2024 parliamentary elections were seen as the last shred of hope by everyone, apparently except the main players: the opposition political parties. Georgian political opposition was expected to deliver bold, surprising moves that would catch the ruling party off guard and divert it from its well-structured traps. When the central issue at stake is the country’s sovereignty and reorientation of the entire statecraft, this is no longer a matter for activism alone. Resistance to such a shift must necessarily be political; it must be led, organized, and sustained by actors with the legitimacy and capacity to claim power, that is, political parties.

A simple plan of three phases of unavoidable change should have been set in motion: for people, regardless of partisan preference, to demand the change, then to believe it was possible, and finally to identify those capable of winning and governing after victory. Activists and civil society fulfilled their role. The movement proved creative and energetic, thus, the demand for change was overwhelming. Yet political leadership failed to transform that demand into a credible strategy of power.”

– Tinatin Khidasheli, Head of Tbilisi-based think tank Civic Idea, former Minister of Defense of Georgia, 2015-2016.

You can read the full article here:

Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall? – ENB Features Analysis by Tinatin Khidasheli Read More »

Scroll to Top