Civicidea

Jamestown Publishes Tinatin Khidasheli’s Analysis of Georgian Dream’s Shift from Western Partner to Provocateur

We would like to inform you that Jamestown has published a new article by Tinatin Khidasheli, “Georgian Dream Shifting from Western Partner to Provocateur.”

The article analyzes how Georgia’s ruling party, Georgian Dream, has shifted from a pro-Western orientation to adopting a more confrontational stance toward Western partners. Khidasheli examines the government’s increasing use of anti-Western rhetoric and conspiracy-driven narratives – such as references to the “Deep State” and the “Global War Party” – to undermine trust in Western institutions, diplomats, civil society, independent media, and domestic political opponents.

The analysis highlights how this narrative reframes Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic integration as a security threat, while consolidating domestic political control and deflecting responsibility for democratic backsliding onto external actors. Khidasheli also discusses the broader implications of this shift for Georgia’s strategic direction, its democratic institutions, and its relations with key Western allies.

Jamestown Publishes Tinatin Khidasheli’s Analysis of Georgian Dream’s Shift from Western Partner to Provocateur Read More »

What Does the Trump Administration’s National Security Strategy Say About China?

The Trump administration presented a new National Security Strategy. Unlike the 2017 National Security Strategy, which described China as “America’s most significant geopolitical challenge,” the newly released document does not frame China in these terms. In previous administrations’ reports, strong emphasis was placed on China’s authoritarian system and human rights violations. By contrast, the Trump administration’s strategy focuses primarily on US–China economic competition, while identifying the prevention of conflict in the Indo-Pacific region as one of the key priorities in bilateral relations.

The document states that the United States made a mistake by opening its market to Chinese investment and encouraging China’s economic growth in the expectation that China would integrate into a “rules-based international order.” According to the Trump administration, China instead accumulated wealth and global power and, rather than strengthening the global order, consolidated its own strategic advantages. This trend is described as resulting in a “fundamental imbalance” in US–China trade relations. As the document notes, “what began in 1979 as trade between the world’s richest and one of its poorest economies has now become competition between nearly equal players.” Consequently, the strategy aims to restore America’s economic independence by re-establishing reciprocity and fairness in trade.

According to Wen-Ti Sung, a researcher at the Atlantic Council, the goal of the document is to “restore the balance between interests and values.” For Trump, the new priority is America’s own national development, a vision aligned with the Monroe Doctrine and the overarching concept of “America First.” Under this approach, China is no longer viewed as an ideological or geopolitical rival, as both dimensions have been replaced by an economic focus.

China’s response to this shift toward economic pragmatism has been generally positive, though cautious. The spokesperson for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jiakun, adopted a neutral and restrained tone, emphasizing the importance of “peaceful coexistence” and “win-win cooperation.” At the same time, skeptics in China argue that the softening of US rhetoric may reflect an attempt by Washington to concentrate on securing its own advantages in bilateral trade, and therefore does not rule out the possibility of restrictive economic measures against China.

Notably, the only geopolitical issue examined in detail in the document is Taiwan. For the Chinese Communist Party, Taiwan represents a “red line.” At present, Washington maintains close unofficial relations with Taiwan and, under existing agreements, is obligated to provide the island with defensive arms. The strategy identifies a potential conflict over Taiwan as a major economic challenge, as approximately one-third of global maritime trade passes annually through the South China Sea. Any conflict or blockade around Taiwan would therefore threaten US economic interests.

Responsibility for preventing a Taiwan-related conflict is shared with other countries, including the European Union. The strategy calls on US allies to increase their defense spending and emphasizes the importance of providing US forces with access to ports and other military facilities. In particular, allies such as Japan and South Korea are expected to ensure broader access for US military personnel and infrastructure.

Author: Mariam Arabashvili 

What Does the Trump Administration’s National Security Strategy Say About China? Read More »

Brussels Tightens Oversight of Chinese Companies

China has accused the European Union of creating unfair “trade and investment barriers,” issuing the statement shortly after the EU launched a new, in-depth investigation last Thursday under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) into Nuctech, a Chinese manufacturer of security equipment. This move came just days after a raid on Temu’s Dublin office, also carried out under the same regulation.

The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU (CCCEU) voiced “strong opposition” to what it described as the European Commission’s “targeted and excessive” investigations aimed at determining whether Chinese state subsidies were distorting competition in the European market.

According to the chamber, the FSR is being applied unfairly: so far, most investigations have focused exclusively on Chinese companies or businesses backed by Chinese capital.

A survey conducted this year by the CCCEU, covering 205 Chinese companies and organizations, found that more than 60% of Chinese firms operating within the EU have been directly affected by the implementation of the FSR. Many companies reported business disruptions, lost commercial opportunities, and increased operational risks. Over half of respondents said the FSR had harmed their reputation and the way they are perceived in the market. Beijing further claimed that some firms were forced to scale back or halt projects as a result of these investigations, leading to losses exceeding $2.05 billion.

A report published in May by the U.S. law firm Arnold & Porter noted that Brussels has launched investigations largely based on political and economic priorities, focusing mainly on strategic sectors such as telecommunications, clean energy, infrastructure, and security equipment.

The EU’s heightened scrutiny of Chinese subsidies comes amid growing worries within the bloc that European industry cannot compete with the surge of Chinese imports. French President Emmanuel Macron has described the situation as a “life or death moment” for Europe’s industrial base.

As a result, despite being major trading partners, tensions between China and the EU are rising, especially over Beijing’s support for renewable energy and electric-vehicle sectors. At the same time, the EU’s tougher approach reflects its broader goals: reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 and reducing technological dependence on China, a shift that signals Europe’s increased focus on security and strategic resilience.

Author: Sesili Adamia

Brussels Tightens Oversight of Chinese Companies Read More »

Israel Defense Forces Halt Use of Chinese-Made Cars

In early November 2025, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced a decision to cease using cars manufactured in China, citing concerns that data collected by these vehicles could be transmitted to China. According to the IDF, by the first quarter of 2026, about 700 vehicles—including the Chery Tiggo 8 Pro—will be removed from parking areas used by junior officers. The decision followed increasing suspicions that the smart systems embedded in the cars could gather sensitive information about Israel’s military activities and send it to China or other third parties.

This move is not based solely on hypothetical fears of future espionage. Chinese-made vehicles, which have been provided to IDF colonels and other officials since 2022, operate on closed operating systems. These vehicles are equipped with advanced smart technologies, including cameras, microphones, sensors, and communication systems capable of collecting geolocation data, audio and video recordings, and even biometric information. There is a tangible risk that such data could be transmitted to external servers—potentially located in China—without the knowledge or consent of the driver or the importing company.

Moreover, built-in GPS systems continuously collect real-time location and diagnostic data. The Chery Tiggo 8 Pro, in particular, is equipped with high-resolution 360-degree cameras that are capable of recording military exercises, troop movements, and military equipment. Such capabilities raise serious concerns that sensitive military information could be inadvertently captured and stored.

Notably, Israeli security officials attempted to “sterilize” the vehicles—seeking technical solutions to prevent any transmission of data to external entities—but ultimately concluded that this was not feasible. Taking these risks into account, representatives of Israel’s security and intelligence agencies decided to prohibit Chinese-made vehicles from entering state and security agency premises altogether.

In early November, Israel’s aerospace and defense industries also banned the use of Chinese vehicles. Plans are underway to prohibit these vehicles from entering military-industrial facilities entirely. Personnel who own Chinese-made cars will be required to park them in designated parking areas located outside factory premises.

According to the Israeli Air Force, there are already restricted zones where Chinese vehicles are not permitted to enter. Authorities intend to expand these restricted areas further to prevent unforeseen incidents and to ensure that vehicles driven by employees or visitors do not accidentally enter sensitive or classified locations.

These decisions by the IDF and related defense industries may have a significant impact on the export of Chinese vehicles to Israel. The process is already underway, as the issuance of import licenses for Chinese automobiles has been substantially restricted and delayed. Available information indicates that following the postponement of licensing deadlines for major importers, the Chinese government officially contacted Israel regarding the matter.

Israel’s actions align with similar measures taken by the United States and the United Kingdom, where the use of Chinese-made equipment is restricted on government and security agency premises. In the United States, the Pentagon banned not only Chinese-made vehicles but also Chinese-manufactured mobile phones from military, security, and government facilities.

The risks associated with Chinese smart technologies are also relevant to Georgia. Over recent years, Georgian government institutions have actively purchased and deployed Chinese-made surveillance cameras. Research conducted by Civic IDEA indicates that these cameras pose a national security risk, as there is a realistic possibility that data collected by Chinese surveillance systems could be accessed by Chinese intelligence services. For this reason, certain Chinese-made surveillance cameras have been banned in several Western countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and a number of European Union member states.

At the same time, Chinese-made vehicles are rapidly entering the Georgian market. Between January and August 2024, imports of Chinese automobiles to Georgia increased by 111 percent compared to the same period in the previous year. While experts note the affordability and availability of these vehicles, they also warn of associated risks, including non-compliance with European quality standards. Notably, in 2025, following the signing of a memorandum of cooperation with Sena Auto Group, the Chinese automotive brand Chery—banned by the Israel Defense Forces—officially entered the Georgian market.

Author: Mariam Kapanadze

Israel Defense Forces Halt Use of Chinese-Made Cars Read More »

Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall? – ENB Features Analysis by Tinatin Khidasheli

The Eastern Neighborhood Bulletin – a regional analytical platform covering political, security, and governance developments across Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus – has published a comprehensive expert review titled “Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall?”

The article brings together insights from nine leading specialists from Georgia, Europe, and the United States. Among them is Tinatin Khidasheli, Chairperson of Civic IDEA and former Minister of Defense of Georgia, who offers her analysis on the political developments surrounding the 2024 parliamentary elections and the protest movement that followed.

In her contribution, Tinatin Khidasheli highlights the critical failures of political leadership, noting that while civil society demonstrated remarkable energy and creativity, opposition parties did not transform public demand for change into a unified and credible political strategy:

“The 2024 parliamentary elections were seen as the last shred of hope by everyone, apparently except the main players: the opposition political parties. Georgian political opposition was expected to deliver bold, surprising moves that would catch the ruling party off guard and divert it from its well-structured traps. When the central issue at stake is the country’s sovereignty and reorientation of the entire statecraft, this is no longer a matter for activism alone. Resistance to such a shift must necessarily be political; it must be led, organized, and sustained by actors with the legitimacy and capacity to claim power, that is, political parties.

A simple plan of three phases of unavoidable change should have been set in motion: for people, regardless of partisan preference, to demand the change, then to believe it was possible, and finally to identify those capable of winning and governing after victory. Activists and civil society fulfilled their role. The movement proved creative and energetic, thus, the demand for change was overwhelming. Yet political leadership failed to transform that demand into a credible strategy of power.”

– Tinatin Khidasheli, Head of Tbilisi-based think tank Civic Idea, former Minister of Defense of Georgia, 2015-2016.

You can read the full article here:

Why Didn’t Georgian Dream Fall? – ENB Features Analysis by Tinatin Khidasheli Read More »

Tinatin Khidasheli at Hitotsubashi University’s Global Governance Research (GGR) Session

Civic IDEA Chairperson Tinatin Khidasheli delivered a talk at Hitotsubashi University within the Global Governance Research (GGR) series, addressing the theme “Small States in Turbulent Regions: Lessons from Georgia’s Current Political Challenges.”

The discussion focused on Georgia’s evolving geopolitical environment and the wider dynamics of the South Caucasus, including the pressures created by hybrid threats, authoritarian influence, and regional instability. Khidasheli emphasized how these dynamics shape the strategic choices of small states and how those choices, in turn, affect broader regional security.

In its introduction, the Institute for Global Governance Research highlighted Khidasheli’s leadership at Civic IDEA and her long-standing work on countering authoritarian influence, Russian propaganda, and hybrid warfare. It also noted her earlier roles in public service, including serving as Georgia’s first female Minister of Defense and as founder and chairperson of the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association.

The session brought together students and faculty for an in-depth conversation on the challenges facing democratic governance in turbulent regions and the importance of understanding small states’ responses to global shifts.

Tinatin Khidasheli at Hitotsubashi University’s Global Governance Research (GGR) Session Read More »

China in the South Caucasus and Kazakhstan (December 1–7)

Georgia

Meeting with the Delegation of Hubei University of Education

December 2

Deputy Minister of Education, Science and Youth of Georgia, Baia Kvitsiani, met with a delegation from China’s Hubei University of Education.

According to information released by the Ministry of Education, Science and Youth, the president of Hubei University, Zheng Juni, “expressed special gratitude for the steps taken in Georgia in recent years that support the development of Chinese-language teaching.”

During the meeting, the parties discussed the importance of joint and exchange projects between Hubei University and Georgian universities.

Chinese Ambassador Hosted Georgia–China Friendship Group Representatives

December 4

According to information shared on the Facebook page of the Embassy of China in Georgia, on December 4, the Chinese Embassy hosted the Georgia–China Friendship Group of the Parliament of Georgia.

The meeting was attended by the Deputy Speaker of Parliament and Chair of the Georgia–China Friendship Group, Giorgi Volski; Vice Speakers Ilia Injia, Sozar Subari, and Nino Tsilosani; as well as the chairs of several parliamentary committees.

According to the Embassy, in his remarks, Ambassador Zhou Qian stated that “members of parliament have long supported China–Georgia friendship, and the legislative bodies of our two countries have maintained close cooperation in recent years. China stands ready to strengthen cooperation between legislative bodies and share experience with Georgia in the field of governance.”

Discussion on Exporting “Ipkli Digomi” Bread to the Chinese Market

December 5

According to information reported by Bm.ge, interest has emerged in exporting “Ipkli Digomi” bread to the Chinese market.

According to the company’s marketing manager, Sofio Bediashvili, the export of Ipkli’s diabetic bread to China is under consideration. For this purpose, a Chinese delegation visited Georgia and expressed interest in cooperating with the company. However, as the marketing manager notes, before imports can begin, a number of procedures must be completed, as China has internal standards to which the company must adapt.

Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan and China’s central banks discuss deepening cooperation

December 1

During his working visit to China, the Chairman of the Central Bank of Azerbaijan, Taleh Kazimov, met with the governor of the People’s Bank of China, Pan Gongsheng.

During the meeting, the sides discussed monetary policy and financial stability, payment systems, and QR and mobile payment mechanisms.

They also reviewed the issue of strengthening cooperation between the two central banks.

The President of the National Academy of Sciences Delivered a Lecture for Chinese Students

December 3

The President of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan, Isa Habibbayli, met with students studying the Azerbaijani language at Beijing Foreign Studies University who are attending courses in Azerbaijan to improve their language skills.

During the meeting, Isa Habibbayli delivered a lecture to the Chinese students on “Literary Movements in Azerbaijani Literature.”

Azerbaijani Wine Promotion Events Held in China

December 4

From November 27 to December 4, events were held in the Chinese cities of Nanjing and Xi’an to present and promote Azerbaijani wine.

The events aimed to introduce Azerbaijani wine to the Chinese market and to increase the country’s export potential.

During the events, negotiations were held with potential Chinese partners.

China Supports Demining Operations in Azerbaijan

December 5

The Chairman of the Azerbaijan Mine Action Agency, Vugar Suleymanov, met with China’s Ambassador to Azerbaijan, Lu Mei.

According to information released by the Azerbaijan State News Agency, Vugar Suleymanov thanked the Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China for the financial support provided for demining operations.

For her part, the Chinese Ambassador noted that demining work is an important component of the strategic partnership between the two countries. According to the Ambassador, during the official visit of Azerbaijan’s President, Ilham Aliyev, to China in April 2025, a number of agreements were signed between China and Azerbaijan. Among them was a memorandum on cooperation in the field of demining, and China’s financial assistance is being provided within the framework of this memorandum.

At the end of the meeting, the sides exchanged documents confirming the financial assistance provided by China for demining operations under the memorandum.

Azerbaijani Delegation at International Seminar in China

December 6 

Representatives of the Azerbaijan Institute of Standardization, which operates under the State Service for Antimonopoly and Consumer Market Control, participated in an international seminar held in the Chinese cities of Chengdu and Tianjin.

According to information released by the Institute, the aim of the seminar was to share experience and deepen cooperation between China and developing countries in the fields of green energy and sustainable development.

Armenia

Armenia Seeks to Deepen Relations with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization

December 4

During a press conference, Armenia’s Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, stated that Armenia is interested in expanding its relations with China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in all areas. In his remarks, the Prime Minister referred to China as one of Armenia’s reliable partners.

It is noteworthy that in early summer 2025, Armenia officially expressed its desire to join the SCO. Later, in August 2025, an agreement was signed between China and Armenia on establishing a strategic partnership.

International Conference “Eurasian Research on Modern China and Eurasia” Held in Yerevan

December 5

The sixth annual two-day international conferenceEurasian Research on Modern China and Eurasia was held in Yerevan, traditionally organized by the China-Eurasia Council for Political and Strategic Research. The event brought together 65 scholars from more than 20 leading institutions worldwide.

Speaking to Armenpress, the conference organizer and head of the China-Eurasia Council, China specialist Mher Sahakyan, emphasized that the conference has become a platform that annually brings prominent scholars from Asia and Europe to Yerevan. During the conference, participants work on joint research projects and publications. Following the 2025 conference, a comprehensive book on Eurasian geopolitics is planned for publication, with contributions from more than 70 authors.

In the interview, Sahakyan stated that China’s influence in Eurasia is growing through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which connects the economies of East Asia and Europe and strengthens Beijing’s political leverage. According to him, China’s strategic partnership agreements with South Caucasus states give Armenia an opportunity to balance relations with major external powers.

Sahakyan also noted that Armenia’s “Crossroads of Peace” initiative could be successfully integrated into China’s Belt and Road project.

The keynote speaker of the conference was Professor Heiwai Tang of the University of Hong Kong. Researchers from Georgia, Turkey, and Iran also participated.

Comment on Armenia by a Chinese Researcher

December 5

At the international conference held in Yerevan (“Eurasian Studies on Modern China and Eurasia”), the Vice President of the University of Hong Kong, Professor Heiwai Tang, delivered a speech in which he discussed the strategic partnership between China and Armenia.

The professor noted that, given Armenia’s small size and population, the country must choose its areas of economic cooperation wisely. In particular, Armenia’s strong human capital makes artificial intelligence an “obvious choice,” while green energy could become a foundation for future economic development for a country traditionally dependent on energy resources.

Kazakhstan

Chinese Citizens Detained at Almaty Airport

December 1

Kazakh authorities detained several foreign nationals at Almaty International Airport on charges of attempting to illegally take infants out of the country.

According to the information released, on November 11, two couples who had arrived from China were stopped at the airport as they attempted to leave Kazakhstan with newborns who were allegedly carried by local surrogate mothers. Although the individuals possessed documentation for the infants, border authorities did not allow them to depart.

In response to the official investigation, the Almaty Police Department confirmed the detentions. The Investigative Department opened a criminal case under Article 135, Part 1 of Kazakhstan’s Criminal Code — “trafficking of minors.”

China in the South Caucasus and Kazakhstan (December 1–7) Read More »

Civic IDEA’s Statement Regarding the Targeted Disinformation Campaign Against the Organization

Today, pro-government media outlets launched a targeted disinformation campaign against Civic IDEA and its chairperson, Tinatin Khidasheli.

The narratives disseminated by these outlets align with Georgian Dream’s latest tactic: labeling anyone who asks critical questions as part of “anti-government forces” to divert attention from real issues. This campaign aims to obscure the findings of our research and discredit the evidence presented in it.

Below, we summarize the key points of the report.

What Facts Provoked the Georgian Dream?

  1. The Sharp Increase in Imports of Iranian Oil and Petrochemical Products to Georgia

In recent years, imports of Iranian oil and petrochemical products have grown dramatically:

  • In 2020, imports from Iran totaled USD 45 million; by 2024, this figure had nearly quintupled, reaching USD 285 million.
  • In 2021 alone, imports of oil and petroleum products increased by 154% compared to 2020, amounting to 3,413 tons.

It is well known that petrochemical exports constitute one of the Iranian regime’s main sources of revenue. Therefore, Georgia’s growing imports of these products amount to indirect financial support for Tehran.

  1. The U.S. Government’s Explicit Warning on Purchasing Iranian Petrochemical Products

On May 1, U.S. President Donald J. Trump issued a warning on the social platform Truth Social, stating:

“Alert: All purchases of Iranian Oil or Petrochemical products must stop, NOW! Any country or person who buys ANY AMOUNT of OIL or PETROCHEMICALS from Iran will be subject to, immediately, Secondary Sanctions. They will not be allowed to do business with the United States of America in any way, shape, or form.”

Clearly, Georgian Dream attempts to downplay or hide relevant facts that show its collaborative stance toward a regime openly hostile to the United States. 

  1. Guidance Published on Iranian Websites on How to Bypass Sanctions Using Georgia

Numerous Iranian online platforms openly discuss fraudulent schemes that allow Iranian businesses to circumvent international sanctions. According to these sources, Georgia offers a convenient route for Tehran to access Russian, Chinese, and even Western markets.

Examples from Iranian sources include:

  • “A favorable environment has been created for Iranian traders: they can bring their products into Georgia and, by repackaging them under Georgian labels, export them to the EU or the U.S. without paying customs tariffs and at competitive prices.”
  • “Iran can indeed circumvent U.S. restrictions and access global markets for various products by trading through Georgia. One of Georgia’s key advantages is its extensive network of trade agreements, particularly with Europe.”

Iranian websites further encourage business owners to take advantage of Georgia’s business environment:

  • The Iranian company Arad Branding published an article advising:
    “If you plan to trade with Georgia, we recommend first registering a company there, especially near ports. This significantly reduces costs and makes imports and exports smoother.”

Indeed, between 2013 and 2024, Iranian citizens registered nearly 9,300 companies in Georgia, illustrating the extent to which the Iranian regime exploits Georgia as a platform for its business operations.

Once again, we emphasize that this report is based exclusively on open sources and statistical data published by the National Statistics Office of Georgia. As before, Georgian Dream responds to factual, evidence-based criticism with its habitual tactic: launching disinformation campaigns and dismissing publicly available information as “fake news.”

Civic IDEA’s Statement Regarding the Targeted Disinformation Campaign Against the Organization Read More »

Tinatin Khidasheli’s Talk at the University of Tokyo

Civic IDEA is pleased to share that on 1 December, our Chair and former Minister of Defence of Georgia, Tinatin Khidasheli, delivered a presentation at a conference hosted by the Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) at the University of Tokyo. 

Her talk, “Frontlines of Influence: Russia, China, and the Hybrid Contest over Georgia,” focused on Georgia’s current geopolitical challenges. Ms. Khidasheli outlined how authoritarian actors – Russia and China – are expanding their political and economic influence in Georgia and shaping developments in the region. She also addressed key issues related to strategic infrastructure, including ongoing debates around the Anaklia deep-sea port.

In the event brief, Akira Igata of the University of Tokyo’s RCAST highlighted how Georgia has become a test ground for hybrid pressure from Russia and China  –  from interference in democratic processes to economic influence and growing pressure on civil society. 

In her lecture, Tinatin Khidasheli discussed these challenges, including China’s planned investments in Georgia such as the Anaklia deep-sea port, and the broader security implications for the region. She also noted that shrinking civic space in Georgia has made civil society leaders frequent targets of disinformation, citing a recent government-backed TV “documentary” that falsely portrayed her as a “Taiwanese agent.” These issues, as Igata emphasized, are not limited to Georgia; authoritarian disinformation campaigns now have global consequences.

The event was attended by University of Tokyo students, members of the academic community, and media representatives. The session concluded with an interactive Q&A and discussion, allowing participants to engage directly with the topics raised during the presentation.

Tinatin Khidasheli’s Talk at the University of Tokyo Read More »

“Small States in Turbulent Regions” – Tinatin Khidasheli’s Talk

“Small States in Turbulent Regions: Lessons from Georgia’s Current Political Challenges” – Tinatin Khidasheli’s Talk 

02/Dec/2025  │  Hitotsubashi University, Japan 

As part of the series of meetings organized by The Institute for Global Governance Research (GGR) – established in April 2020 as a university-wide organization focusing on global law and global governance research – students of Hitotsubashi University will meet  Tinatin Khidasheli, Chairperson of Civic IDEA . The discussion will focus on the geopolitical situation in Georgia and the South Caucasus, as well as the challenges posed by rising authoritarian powers in the region.

“Tinatin Khidasheli heads the Georgian research and analytic organization Civic IDEA, fighting authoritarian influence in Georgia, confronting Russian propaganda, and advocating for the country’s defense and security policy. She is the author of the first Georgian-language book on Hybrid Warfare and has taught Hybrid Warfare and Defense Policy at several universities. Throughout her career, she has held various high-ranking public positions, including Georgia’s first female Minister of Defense, and was the founder/chairperson of the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association, which remains one of the largest human rights advocacy groups in Georgia.” – writes The Institute for Global Governance Research

“Small States in Turbulent Regions” – Tinatin Khidasheli’s Talk Read More »

Scroll to Top