Civicidea

Helsinki Commission Holds Hearing on Georgia’s Democratic Backsliding

On September 10, the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe—better known as the Helsinki Commission—held a hearing on Georgia. Lawmakers and experts delivered sharp criticism of the ruling Georgian Dream party’s foreign and domestic policies.

The session, titled “From Partner to Problem: Georgia’s Anti-American Turn,” featured testimony from President Salome Zourabichvili, former Minister of Defense Tinatin Khidasheli, and Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Luke Coffey.

We invite you to read the full speech of Civic IDEA Chairperson and former Defense Minister of Georgia, Tinatin Khidasheli:

Testimony of Tinatin Khidasheli
Former Minister of Defense of Georgia
The Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (U.S. Helsinki Commission)
Hearing: “From Partner to Problem: Georgia’s Anti-American Turn”
September 10, 2025

Chairman, Co-Chairman, distinguished Commissioners, and Members of the Commission,

Thank you for inviting me and for giving me the opportunity to represent the vision of the vast majority of my Georgian compatriots. My goal here today is

  1. To Defend Georgia’s single most important foreign policy priority: maintaining and strengthening our strategic partnership with the United States.
  2. I stand here To Expose Authoritarian Drift and present alarming evidence that the Georgian Dream government has systematically and rapidly abandoned this national interest, turning instead toward alliances with authoritarian powers.
  3. To show Why Georgia Matters to America —anchoring the Black Sea, resisting China, Russia and Iran, and keeping a strategic bridge between Europe and Asia open.

The concrete evidence, I bring here today, speaks not just about the Georgian government’s departure from a strategic partnership with the US, but speaks first and foremost about their departure from the will and strategic interests of the Georgian people.

This is a departure from the cause,

  • that led Georgian hero George Antsukhelidze to sacrifice his life, while being tortured by Russian invaders in 2008;
  • this is a departure from the cause, which led Georgian journalist Mzia Amaglobeli to sacriffce her freedom in 2025, while protecting the cause of Antsukhelidze from the increasingly anti-Western and pro-Russian government of Georgia.

I also speak to you as former Minister of Defense, of a country that stood as U.S. partner for over two decades, fighting shoulder to shoulder in Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond. Georgia was the largest non-NATO and second-largest contributor of troops in Afghanistan. We paid a heavy price, with the highest casualty rate and 435 wounded.

I appear before you today as a Georgian citizen alarmed that, since Russia’s brutal invasion of Ukraine, the regime in Tbilisi has waged a relentless campaign to dismantle every bond with the U.S., EU, and UK—denouncing these partnerships as a conspiracy of an ‘imaginary global war party’ and in doing so, striking at the very core of Georgia’s sovereignty and independence.

Let me begin with a simple truth:

For more than thirty years, the United States has stood by Georgia as a reliable partner, a supporter of our sovereignty, and a defender of our freedom.

I want to begin by acknowledging this legacy, although this legacy is under attack now.

there is no security plan for Georgia without the United States. Without U.S. assistance and commitment, Georgia’s statehood would not have been secured and would not have survived.

  • It was U.S. involvement in 2008 that stopped Putin in Georgia.
  • U.S. leadership has been, and remains, central to the non-recognition policy of our breakaway regions occupied by Russia.
  • It was the US assistance that helped us build the modern army and state institutions.
  • It was the US assistance that helped us build hospitals and schools, develop university programs…etc ., list is very long.  

We hope this partnership can be preserved.

Georgia matters to the United States, Europe, and the international community for three fundamental reasons:

  • Geography
  • strategic connectivity,
  • and its democratic example.

Georgia lies at the very heart of the Middle Corridor — the modern Silk Road route linking East and West, North and South – connecting Europe with Central Asia, bypassing Russia and Iran. We may be small in size, but our competitive advantage has been our role as a gateway and a connector.

  • We linked Central Asia to European markets through pipelines, railways, and ports.

This is not only a trade route. It is what I call the “corridor of freedom.” When goods, energy, data, and people fly through Georgia, they fly through a country that has chosen democracy and freedom. Unlike its northern alternative, it is a route where there is no political blackmail; it is both practical and politically reliable for the United States and its allies. Ironically, today when Russia’s weaknesses were exposed in Ukraine (demonstrated everywhere from Syria to Karabakh), it still manages to tighten its grip on Georgia, specifically to close off that corridor of freedom. 

For the United States, the Middle Corridor’s offer is invaluable: resilience in the face of authoritarian strongholds, given the fundamentalist threat from Iran, the authoritarian menace of Russia, seeking to weaponize its geography and China cementing BRI, the Middle Corridor provides the democratic alternative.

Georgia is its anchor. Without Georgia, there is no free corridor – lose it, and the door opens to Russia, China and Iran.

(Show Iran Report:) Here is our latest publication “-” that documents how a once US’s strategic partner can change alliances, become problematic in avoiding sanctions, and disrespecting partnerships.

The Present Danger: Why Georgia Is Under Threat Today

A free, democratic, Western-oriented Georgia is unacceptable to Moscow, Tehran and increasingly problematic for Beijing. And unfortunately, today’s ruling party, Georgian Dream, has chosen a path that serves those authoritarian interests rather than resisting them. They undermined institutions, manipulated elections, and criminalized dissent. They have arrested opposition leaders, used violence against peaceful protestors, and refused to respect the will of the Georgian people expressed at the ballot box.

GD has deepened ties with authoritarian powers. They court Chinese companies while blocking U.S. businesses from opportunities in the Middle Corridor.

(Show report on Anaklya and case) Anaklya case is the best prove of it. Georgian-American consortia kicked out and promised Chinese investor. We wrote a lot about, collected al the evidence and can provide it all.

Make no mistake, the Chinese are not even investing in Georgia.

Instead, they win procurement bids one after another under favorable conditions and reap benefits from Georgia. Here we have been investigating, researching and writing about those dirty deals over the years, company after another. While U.S. companies have invested billions in the Georgian economy and provided over $4 billion in aid for our security and institutions, the Chinese are exploiting the corrupt and kleptocratic nature of the GD government and gaining more and more.

They secured over 4.5 billion, and this represents only a small portion of contracts (8 infrastructure projects out of many) they have received. Let me stress this point once again, so as not to be misunderstood, there is no significant FDI from China in Georgia. It is all your money — IFI money, American, European, or Georgian taxpayers’ money.

The consequences are grave. Georgia drifting into authoritarianism does not only threaten its own people. It directly undermines U.S. interests in the region:

  • It weakens the reliability of the Middle Corridor as a secure transit route.
  • It reduces U.S. influence in the Black Sea and Eurasia at a time when Russia and China are fighting for expanding theirs.
  • It emboldens authoritarian regimes by proving that Western allies can be peeled away and democratic experiments reversed.

This is not simply Georgia’s internal problem.

It is a strategic setback for the entire transatlantic community.

Our competitive advantage was never oil or gas. It was a democratic Georgia, — European, free and ready to stand side by side with the United States and European allies. It has threatened Moscow’s imperial project and ambitions.

If Georgia can succeed, then Russians may ask: why not us? If Georgians can live under the rule of law, then Belarusians may wonder: why not us? Georgia’s transformation was infectious. And for Russia, China, Iran and for every authoritarian power, this was deeply dangerous. And that is precisely why Russia, and now increasingly China, have a vested interest in undermining our sovereignty, corrupting our institutions, and dragging us back into the orbit of authoritarianism.

If Georgia fails on its democratic path it sets a dangerous example for the whole region.

But here is the good news: the Georgian people have not given up.

Despite repression, despite propaganda, despite the ruling party’s betrayal of our democratic aspirations, Georgians remain overwhelmingly pro-Western. Poll after poll shows support for EU and NATO membership at historic highs. The people continue to believe in freedom. And they continue to believe in the United States. This distinction matters. Because when we speak of Georgia today, we must not confuse the government with the nation. Georgians continue to wave American and EU flags at protests. They continue to demand that Georgia belongs to Europe and to the democratic world.

Georgia has always relied on U.S. support, and in these difficult times, we need it more than ever. We need you to stand by us while we talk to our friends or our enemies. At the heart of these conversations are the questions of EU membership, NATO membership, and the reality of Russian occupation.

For nearly 300 days now, Georgians have been protesting in the streets — in the rain, in the cold, facing batons, tear gas, and prison cells. These are not symbolic gestures; they are sacrifices. Activists, journalists, artists, teachers, risk everything because they refuse to accept a stolen future.

  • Journalist Mzia Amaglobelihas been targeted by police, arrested and sentenced.
  • A schoolteacher, Nino Datashvili,is waiting for her prison term and dozens of others not for crimes, but for loving Georgia and refusing to tolerate dictatorial policies.
  • Georgian political leaders were called by the special commission of the one-party parliament set to gather testimonies favoring the Russian version of its 2008 invasion of Georgia – provocation of the West executed by the Georgian president. Leaders refusing to appear to this commission were prosecuted and jailed.

We fight everyday and we need all the support: 

sanctions, diplomatic measures targeting political elite of the Georgian Dream, the enablers of the regime, the Russian-style propaganda machine, and the ideologists of a Putin-driven policy.

This brings me to the role of the United States. The U.S. has always been, and must remain, the indispensable ally for Georgia’s democracy. At this critical juncture, I would urge this Commission and the U.S. Congress to consider the following:

  1. Targeted Accountability.Sanctions and visa bans should be directed at the ruling elite, their families, and their enablers. punish those who betray Georgia. More Sanctions for GD leadership, more scholarships for Georgia youth and students.
  2. Support for Democratic Institutions and Civil Society.Assist independent media, civil society organizations, and grassroots movements. These are the lifelines of democracy in Georgia today.
  3. Stand explicitly with the Georgian people.Make clear that U.S. support is for democracy, sovereignty, and independence — not for any ruling party undermining these values. Publicly and repeatedly affirm U.S. commitment to Georgia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and democratic future.  Regardless of the regime we need US to defend non recognition policy of the Russian occupied territories at the UN, we need doors open to NATO and the EU.
  4. Support bipartisan legislation, the MEGOBARI Act, that represents exactly the kind of sustained, strategic support that can help Georgia’s civil society, independent media, and reformers survive these difficult times.  Targeted sanctions against those who undermine democracy and tirelessly make friends with the Axis of Evil, enemies of the US, and democratic transatlantic partners are equally vital. MEGOBARI act sends the strongest possible signal that Georgia’s democratic future remains a U.S. strategic priority. It provides tools to hold accountable those who undermine democracy, while strengthening the capacity of civil society and independent institutions.
  5. Invest in the Middle Corridor and connectivity.Georgia’s strategic geography must not be left to Chinese, Russian or Iran influence. U.S. businesses and infrastructure initiatives should be prioritized and supported, ensuring that the corridor remains open, resilient, and democratic. Support U.S. and european investment in the Middle Corridor, in Georgia’s Black Sea ports, in digital infrastructure, and in energy transit. This is not a charity; it is a mutually beneficial strategy. By anchoring Georgia in the Western economic system, the United States will secure its own access and influence across Eurasia.
  6. Deepen security cooperation.Georgia has shown through its contributions in Afghanistan and Iraq that it is a reliable security partner. Renewed defense cooperation, joint training, and stronger deterrence measures in the Black Sea are not gifts — they are mutually beneficial investments.
  7. And once again, maintain people-to-people ties.Scholarships, exchanges, cultural programs, and civil society support all sustain the pro-Western orientation of Georgia’s younger generation. This is long-term resilience building at its best.

Georgia’s story is not finished.

We have stumbled, but we have not fallen. The Georgian people remain committed to the values that made us a partner of the United States. We are at a moment of profound danger, yes.. If left to drift, Georgia may indeed slide deeper into authoritarianism and away from the West. But with U.S. support — steadfast, bipartisan, principled — Georgia can still reclaim its role as a beacon of democracy, stability and business opportunity in the Black Sea region.

Let me conclude by saying that Georgia still matters. It matters for America’s security, Europe’s stability, and the global contest between democracy and authoritarianism.

This is not only about Georgia. It is about the credibility of democracy in a contested world. It is about whether the United States and its allies can still shape the global order in a way that resists authoritarian expansion. It is about whether freedom corridor will be held by those who believe in liberty, or by those who would use it to divide and control.

Back in 2008, we were telling to the whole world that it is not about Georgia, it is about not allowing an aggressor swallow a small neighbor (which would be an irreparable blow to the rules based international order). And here, we have an evidence, how 2008 invasion of Georgia led to the 2014 annexation of Crimea and eventually to the full scale invasion of Ukraine. Now is the continuation of that episode by other means. Russia is trying to finish the business it started back in 2008 by exporting its authoritarian political system. 

Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, Members: Georgia has always aspired to be America’s partner, never its problem. Make no mistake: there is no Friendly Georgia without it being a democratic, European state. Authoritarian Georgia with a despotic regime in Tbilisi is a suitable partner only for Iran, Russia and China.

For us, Georgians, America first means Georgia first. That‘s because the United States was the brightest guiding light throughout our journey from communism to the free world. For Georgians, a strong America always meant a strong strategic partner in making freedom, democracy, the rule of law, human dignity, prosperity, and security first on Georgian soil as well.

These temporary setbacks under an authoritarian government cannot erase the lasting truth: a democratic Georgia makes America stronger. Thank you for your attention, support, and unwavering commitment to Georgia’s future 

Helsinki Commission Holds Hearing on Georgia’s Democratic Backsliding Read More »

Georgia’s Investment Landscape: Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Western Investments (2018–2025) ( part II )

Civic IDEA is pleased to present its latest publication, Georgia’s Investment Landscape: Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Western Investments (2018–2025).

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in Georgia, based on official data from the National Statistics Office of Georgia. A closer examination of Chinese FDI flows reveals that, contrary to the expectations promoted by the Georgian Dream party, Chinese investment in Georgia has continued to decline.

The study contrasts these official statistics with public statements made by Georgian and Chinese officials, uncovering the gap between rhetoric and reality, as well as the recurring manipulation of investment-related information.

Furthermore, the report adopts a comparative perspective by examining Chinese FDI alongside Western investment flows. The findings highlight a striking contrast: while Chinese FDI has sharply decreased, Western countries remain Georgia’s leading investors. This comparison underscores the limited role of Chinese capital in Georgia’s economy and challenges prevailing political narratives.

For further insights and a deeper analysis,

please refer to the full report: 

Georgia’s Investment Landscape: Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Western Investments (2018–2025) ( part II ) Read More »

“Georgia’s Anti-American Turn” – On September 10, the Helsinki Commission will hold a hearing on Georgia.

“Georgia’s Anti-American Turn” – On September 10, the Helsinki Commission will hold a hearing on Georgia. The speakers will be Salome Zourabichvili, Tina Khidasheli, and Luke Coffey. 

Georgia was once a core U.S. partner and a beacon of freedom in the Caucasus. Today, the ruling Georgian Dream party is dragging the country back into Russia’s orbit and deepening their relationship with China and other U.S. adversaries. Over the past few years, Georgian Dream has crippled Georgia’s institutions and further undermined Georgia’s sovereignty by courting Chinese investment while blocking U.S. businesses from Middle Corridor trade and access to Central Asian rare earth minerals. They have jailed opposition, used violence against peaceful protestors, and refused to relinquish their grip on power after elections widely viewed as illegitimate. This poses an immediate and serious threat to U.S. interests in the region.

This hearing will examine the global consequences of Georgia’s slide into authoritarianism. Witnesses will also explore U.S. policy options, such as passage of the bipartisan MEGOBARI Act, to assist the people of Georgia as they seek to maintain their independence and longstanding, mutually beneficial relationship with the United States.” – the Helsinki Commission writes.

LIVE: The hearing will be broadcast live on September 10, at 10:30 PM Tbilisi time, via the following link: youtube.com/live/-TlMiyHZS4I?feature=share

“Georgia’s Anti-American Turn” – On September 10, the Helsinki Commission will hold a hearing on Georgia. Read More »

Thailand-Cambodia Rapprochement: China’s Diplomatic Role

Thailand and Cambodia have reconfirmed their ceasefire agreement reached after several days of conflict in the disputed border region. This confirmation followed China’s diplomatic intervention, which facilitated a meeting between the two sides in Shanghai.

Although the ceasefire agreement, formalized in Malaysia, was supposed to take effect from midnight on July 28, 2025, its effectiveness was quickly tested. Thailand’s army accused Cambodia of carrying out multiple attacks on the morning of July 29, 2025, though the Cambodian side denied any firing. Thailand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs characterized this action as an “act of aggression” and a “clear violation” of the ceasefire agreement.

By midday on July 30, 2025, both parties appeared to have reaffirmed their commitment to the ceasefire. At a meeting in Shanghai, representatives from Cambodia and Thailand were pictured smiling with Chinese Vice Minister Sun Weidong, indicating a de-escalation of tensions between the sides. China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that this informal meeting represented its “latest diplomatic effort” and that China was playing a “constructive role” in resolving their border dispute.

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, the acting chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), hosted the meeting where the ceasefire was agreed upon. United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio positively assessed the ceasefire declaration, emphasizing that President Donald Trump and he were “committed to an immediate cessation of violence.” Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet stated that Trump had called him to congratulate him on the peace initiative.

Clashes between Cambodia and Thailand have frequently occurred along their 800-kilometer (500-mile) border in the past. The most recent battles began on July 24, 2025, after a landmine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. The conflict resulted in at least 41 deaths and displaced over 260,000 people from their homes. While some residents are now returning, many still remain in evacuation shelters amidst uncertainty.

Thailand-Cambodia Rapprochement: China’s Diplomatic Role Read More »

EU-China Summit: 50 Years Amidst Tense Relations and New Challenges

To mark the 50th anniversary of relations between the EU and China, the 25th summit was held in Beijing on July 24, 2025. Leaders from both sides discussed all aspects of their bilateral relationship, as well as geopolitical issues, including Russia’s war in Ukraine. The EU was represented by European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, while China was represented by President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang. A joint press release on climate change was issued during the summit.

The mood before the summit was tense, with low expectations for concrete bilateral agreements. The tension stemmed from trade disputes, particularly concerning market access and critical rare earth elements, as well as geopolitical strains, primarily Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine. The EU views China as a partner for global challenges, an economic competitor in developing new technologies, and a systemic rival.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen noted at the summit that the trade relationship between the EU and China needs to become more balanced, as the EU’s trade deficit with China is growing. She emphasized that Europe welcomes competition, but it must be fair. Von der Leyen highlighted three key issues: excess production capacity, which doesn’t align with China’s domestic demand and affects the EU market; market access; and export controls on rare earth elements and permanent magnets. She warned that without progress on these issues, it would be very difficult for the EU to maintain its current level of market openness.

Chinese President Xi Jinping stated that Europe and China must make “correct strategic choices” amidst global challenges. He noted that the current challenges facing Europe do not originate from China. Xi Jinping urged the EU to pursue open cooperation and properly manage disagreements.

It was also noted that trade relations between the EU and China have reached an “inflection point,” as confirmed by comments made after the tense summit in Beijing. Von der Leyen stressed that the EU had “frankly and openly expressed its concerns about trade, investment, and geopolitical issues” and that “solutions were partially identified.” She mentioned that the Chinese leadership has begun to address the issue of overcapacity and expressed willingness to support increased consumption. She also affirmed that the EU’s relationship with China is “important, but it is independent of actions or issues we have with others.”

EU-China Summit: 50 Years Amidst Tense Relations and New Challenges Read More »

Southeast Asia’s Balancing Act between the US and China

With nearly 700 million people, Southeast Asia has found itself at the epicenter of a growing geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China. While the region’s leaders have traditionally sought to avoid choosing sides, shifts in the global order, particularly after the 2008-2009 financial crisis, have placed them squarely in the midst of this competition. Over the past 30 years, many countries have gravitated away from the United States and towards China, significantly harming US ambitions in Asia. The arrival of the Donald Trump administration radically altered US-China relations. Washington perceived Beijing as a strategic threat, a view reflected in the administration’s policies.

Trade agreements signed by the US in Asia, including with Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Japan, are increasing pressure on China. Analysts state that Beijing is meticulously scrutinizing the minute details of bilateral agreements to prevent its economic interests from being undermined. While, the Trump administration’s tariffs, such as “Liberation Day” tariffs, cause misunderstanding and frustration among allies, the US remains an integral economic partner for countries in the region.

It’s noteworthy that the meeting between the Presidents of the United States and the Philippines, Donald Trump and Ferdinand Marcos Jr. took place on Tuesday, July 22, 2025, at the White House. The main topic of this meeting was a trade agreement, under which the U.S. would reduce tariffs for the Philippines to 19%, while in return, the Philippine market would be open for American goods. Discussions also touched upon relations with China, during which Marcos stated that the U.S. is their most important and  main partner and added that concerning China, the Philippines would exercise its right to self-defense, which underscores their independent foreign policy.

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s April visits to Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia, against the backdrop of US tariffs, aimed to strengthen regional ties. During these visits, numerous agreements were signed in the trade, infrastructure, and technology sectors, an effort by China to present itself as a stable and long-term partner. Despite these diplomatic successes, China’s strategy has certain limitations, including financial caution and regional skepticism due to tensions in the South China Sea. A 2024 survey by the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute revealed that while Southeast Asians view China as the most influential economic and strategic power in the region, they trust Japan, the US, and the EU more than China.

Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Cambodia strive to maintain strategic autonomy and avoid entanglement in superpower rivalries. Vietnam, for example, firmly adheres to a non-aligned foreign policy to preserve economic stability. Cambodia, on the other hand, employs a “hedging” strategy to leverage China’s support while simultaneously protecting its own interests. Although the region is clearly leaning towards China, alliance patterns are not immutable, and countries can shift their orientation quite rapidly. This underscores the fact that Beijing still has much work to do to gain the trust of regional states and alleviate their concerns.

Southeast Asia’s Balancing Act between the US and China Read More »

Geopolitical Issues in US-China Trade Talks

On July 21, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that the Trump administration is in no rush to finalize a trade agreement with China, emphasizing that negotiations are still ongoing. Bessent also indicated that the talks may extend beyond tariff-related matters to include “other issues.”

Referring to these “other issues,” Bessent highlighted China’s cooperation with Iran and Russia. He noted that Beijing remains a significant purchaser of sanctioned Iranian and Russian oil, suggesting that these topics could also become part of the broader trade negotiations.

In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun reiterated Beijing’s established stance on tariffs:

“We hope the US will work with China to implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state during their phone call, make full use of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism, enhance mutual understanding through dialogue and communication, reduce misunderstandings, strengthen cooperation, and promote the stable, sound, and sustainable development of China-US relations.”

It is worth noting that, while the Trump administration has recently issued cautiously optimistic messages regarding trade negotiations, Chinese officials have maintained a more neutral tone. On July 18, Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao stated that recent bilateral talks demonstrated there is “no need” for a tariff war between the two nations. He added that both parties now understand their mutual interdependence, as many of the goods and services they exchange are “irreplaceable.” Wang also underscored the burden imposed by the current US tariffs on Chinese goods, which stand at 53.6%.

Earlier, on July 17, Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, commented that recent US-China engagements have fostered high-level dialogue. He emphasized that the economic and trade consultation mechanism should serve to strengthen bilateral relations based on “equal attitude,” mutual „respect,” and a commitment to a “win-win” outcome.

Recent remarks by Chinese officials suggest that Beijing remains reluctant to make concessions in the ongoing tariff dispute. In this context, any attempt to expand the scope of trade negotiations to include China’s oil trade with Iran and Russia could further strain relations between the two countries.

Geopolitical Issues in US-China Trade Talks Read More »

Tensions Between the U.S. and China Over Fentanyl

On July 16, U.S. President Donald Trump signed the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act, also known as the HALT Fentanyl Act. The legislation addresses a growing crisis in American society: the rising rates of fentanyl trafficking and fentanyl-related deaths. In 2023 alone, fentanyl usage caused the deaths of 76,282 Americans. As such, combating this critical problem has become a key priority for the Trump administration.

However, the fentanyl issue has extended beyond domestic policy and has become a source of heightened tensions with China. In February 2025, President Trump imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese imports, citing China’s alleged role in facilitating the production and distribution of fentanyl. In a post published on the social media platform Truth Social, Trump claimed: “A large percentage of these Drugs, much of them in the form of Fentanyl, are made in, and supplied by, China.“

Following the signing of the HALT Fentanyl Act, Trump stated that China is currently paying the U.S. billions of dollars in tariffs to compensate for the damage caused by its involvement in the fentanyl trade. His remarks, however, also included a degree of optimism. He acknowledged that China is taking “big steps” to address the fentanyl issue and expressed confidence that “China is going to end up going from that to giving the death penalty to the people that create this.”

In response, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian reiterated China’s longstanding position, stating that fentanyl is fundamentally an American issue and that the responsibility for it lies within the United States.

Lin criticized the imposition of fentanyl-related tariffs, arguing: “The U.S. has ignored China’s goodwill and insisted on imposing fentanyl tariffs on China, which severely undermines China-U.S. dialogue and cooperation on counternarcotics and significantly harms China’s interests. If the U.S. genuinely seeks to cooperate with China, it must acknowledge the objective facts and engage in dialogue on the basis of equality, mutual respect, and mutual benefit.”

Tensions Between the U.S. and China Over Fentanyl Read More »

„Civic IDEA” Quoted in CNN Article

On July 16, 2025, the American news organization CNN published an article titled: “As democracy in Georgia collapses, Russia, China and Iran see an opening.”

According to the article, under the increasingly authoritarian rule of the Georgian Dream party, „Georgia is quickly slipping under the influence of Russia, China and Iran“.

In its analysis of Chinese and Iranian influence, CNN cites reports prepared by Civic IDEA as one of its primary sources.

Below is an excerpt from the article:

„An investigation by a Georgia-based NGO, Civic IDEA, reports that, “as diplomatic ties between the Georgian Dream government and Iran have grown closer, several Georgian-registered companies have emerged with direct links to Iran’s Ministry of Defense and the Armed Forces Logistics Agency.”

The investigation concludes that “Iranian businessmen are using Georgia as a strategic transit point to evade international sanctions and channel funds back to the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

„Civic IDEA” Quoted in CNN Article Read More »

China in Japan’s 2025 Defense White Paper

On July 15, the Japanese Ministry of Defense released its annual white paper, Japan’s Defense 2025, in which it characterizes China as an “unprecedented and greatest strategic challenge.”

During the presentation of the document, Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani emphasized that, for the first time since World War II, global peace is facing a serious threat, and Japan finds itself in the most severe and complex security environment of the postwar era.

The 34-page white paper presents a pessimistic outlook for the Asia-Pacific region, highlighting the intensifying strategic competition between the United States and China, a dynamic that is contributing to a “dramatic” shift in the global balance of power.

The document notes that China is rapidly increasing its defense spending and enhancing its military capabilities, both quantitatively and qualitatively. It also details China’s expanding military activities across the Asia-Pacific, particularly in the East China Sea and around the Senkaku Islands, a territory administered by Japan but claimed by China, which refers to them as the Diaoyu Islands.

The white paper identifies the growing cooperation between China’s military and its coast guard as a critical threat. It argues that the deepening collaboration between the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the China Coast Guard, part of the People’s Armed Police, is aimed at enhancing China’s operational effectiveness in so-called “gray zone” situations, where the line between war and peace is intentionally blurred.

Taiwan is cited as a key example of such gray zone activity. The document warns that the PLA may employ coast guard forces to enforce a blockade or carry out military interventions against Taiwan. It specifically references the military exercises conducted by China on May 23, 2024, just three days after the inauguration of Taiwan’s new president, as an example of Beijing’s increasingly aggressive posture toward the island.

In response, China’s Ministry of Defense strongly criticized the Japanese white paper, dismissing its assessments as “false narratives.” The Chinese government accused Japan of exaggerating the so-called “China threat” as a pretext to ease its postwar constitutional restrictions on military activity.

“We urge the Japanese side to deeply learn from history, cease slandering and accusing China,” a spokesperson for China’s Defense Ministry stated.

China in Japan’s 2025 Defense White Paper Read More »

Scroll to Top