“Georgia’s Iranian turn” – Tinatin Khidasheli on FRANCE 24
“Georgia’s Iranian turn” – Tinatin Khidasheli on FRANCE 24 Read More »
According to Tinatin Khidasheli, Georgia is suspended between its declared European future and an increasingly authoritarian present. While formally holding candidate status for European Union membership, the political reality has shifted toward systemic control, legal ambiguity, and the suppression of dissent. Legal instruments, particularly the foreign agents law, are designed not merely to regulate but to deter, creating an environment where ordinary professional or civic activity risks criminalisation.
See the full interview:
“Georgia’s Iranian turn” – Tinatin Khidasheli on FRANCE 24 Read More »
On March 23, Tinatin Khidasheli delivered a lecture titled “The New Geopolitical Chessboard: Security and Alliances in Europe” at CEU Universitat Abat Oliba in Barcelona.
In her remarks, she emphasized the importance of alliances and international partnerships in today’s security environment and discussed the real impact of NATO and EU enlargement on Eastern Europe.
“You have probably heard the myths about a Russia irritated by NATO or EU enlargement, left with no choice but to defend its own security. Facts and reality, however, prove the opposite. Russia’s imperial ambitions stopped exactly where enlargement took place. We did not see Putin wage war against Poland or the Baltic states; nor did he attack Finland last year. But we did witness Russia’s aggressive actions in countries where NATO and EU policies were overly cautious and restrained.
No, friends — the expansion of alliances played a decisive role in the peaceful development of Eastern Europe, ensuring their security and, consequently, their prosperity. And only where delays occurred did we see Russian imperial aggression, war, destruction, and casualties… NATO and the European Union remain the clear and unconditional guarantors of peace in Europe, and our recent history confirms this,” – Khidasheli told the audience at the university.
The lecture was held in a roundtable format and addressed changes in Europe’s security architecture, strategic partnerships, and the importance of regional cooperation.
The book “Geopolitics and Diplomacy on the Ground”, co-authored by the Chairperson of Civic IDEA, Tinatin Khidasheli, has been published in Spain by Editorial Dykinson.
The book presentation took place on March 24 in Barcelona, where the authors, including Tinatin Khidasheli, attended in person and shared their experiences with the audience.
The publication is an international collaborative work bringing together reflections and experiences from diplomats, policymakers, and scholars who have shaped, negotiated, and lived the realities of international relations.
This book explores how geopolitical decisions intersect with complex human realities and how diplomacy continues to be an essential tool for peace, negotiation, and building the future — not merely an academic concept, but something lived and practiced on the ground.
A Book Co-Authored by Tinatin Khidasheli Published in Spain Read More »
We would like to present our new report: “The Dragon’s Path in Georgian Media: China in the Georgian Information Environment,” which clearly demonstrates how the Georgian media landscape is being shaped in a way that reflects the anti-Western trajectory of the ruling party, while simultaneously promoting the governance model of the People’s Republic of China as a parallel or alternative path for Georgian society.
The media analysis unequivocally reveals the systematic dissemination of propaganda messages and well-crafted narratives aimed at:
Key Findings:
The report shows that China-related content in Georgian media has significantly increased and become more structured, particularly after “strategic partnership” with China became a government priority.
The following trends are identified:
The report also shows that positive narratives about China are systematically framed within the context of the “failure” of the West, creating a unified informational framework—China is presented as a model of success, while the West is depicted as an example of crisis and failure.
These trends pose a serious challenge to Georgia’s democratic development, the process of Euro-Atlantic integration, and the country’s information security. This demonstrates that informational influence is no longer merely a media issue; it is directly linked to the country’s strategic choices and the future of its democratic development.
The Dragon’s Path in Georgian Media: China in Georgia’s Information Environment Read More »
Bringing decades of experience in international journalism and Russian affairs, Jill Dougherty delivered a lecture titled “Power and Geopolitics in the 21st Century” on March 11 for alumni of Civic Idea projects and participants of its ongoing programs.
The lecture explored how geopolitics shapes the distribution of power in today’s international system, examining how major powers project influence and how smaller states – like Georgia – navigate external pressures and shifting global dynamics, with examples from Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Jill Dougherty is an expert on Russia and the region. She served as CNN’s Moscow Bureau Chief for nearly a decade and has held key roles including White House Correspondent and Foreign Affairs Correspondent. She is currently a CNN on-air contributor, an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University, and affiliated with research institutions such as the Woodrow Wilson Center and the Kennan Institute. She is also the author of My Russia: What I Saw from the Kremlin, reflecting her decades-long experience covering the region.
The Lecture was held in an interactive format, allowing participants to engage in discussion and exchange perspectives on the topics covered.
“Power and Geopolitics in the 21st Century” – Lecture by Jill Dougherty at Civic IDEA Read More »
U.S. and Chinese officials met in Paris on Monday, March 16th. The negotiations have been led by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, to finalize trade and agriculture proposals that could set the stage for a possible summit between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping later this month.
The talks focused on expanding Chinese purchases of U.S. farm goods, including soybeans, and creating new mechanisms to manage trade frictions. Reuters, citing sources familiar with the negotiations, said officials also discussed a possible “Board of Trade” and “Board of Investment” to address sector-specific issues.
The talks also addressed strategic supply chains. Reuters reported that U.S. officials raised access to Chinese critical minerals, including aerospace-grade yttrium, while urging Beijing to buy more Boeing aircraft and U.S. energy exports.
Still, broader geopolitical tensions threaten to overshadow the trade track. Trump said in an interview with the Financial Times, that he may delay the China trip unless Beijing helps efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz after conflict-related disruption sent fresh shockwaves through energy markets.
China has meanwhile kept a harder public line on U.S. trade pressure. In a statement carried by Xinhua News Agency, China’s commerce ministry said it had lodged representations with Washington over a new U.S. forced-labor-related trade probe and urged the United States to “correct its wrongdoings” and resolve disputes through dialogue and consultation. AP also reported that Beijing described the new U.S. investigation as damaging to global supply-chain stability.
The Paris talks appeared aimed more at stabilizing ties than achieving an immediate breakthrough. That suggests both sides are trying to preserve momentum in the relationship even as trade disputes and the Iran-linked energy crisis add new uncertainty.
Author: Mariam Simsive
US-China trade negotiations amid Trump-Xi Jinping Meeting Read More »
On March 13, China sharply criticized a new U.S. trade investigation targeting alleged industrial overcapacity and forced labor, warning it could take countermeasures just days before senior officials from both countries are due to meet in Paris for another round of economic talks.
The dispute adds fresh strain to an already fragile thaw in U.S.-China relations, as Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng is expected to meet U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Paris on March 15-16. The talks are widely seen as groundwork for a planned visit by U.S. President Donald Trump to Beijing starting March 31, although Beijing has not publicly confirmed that trip.
Beijing’s criticism came after the United States launched Section 301 investigations into alleged industrial overcapacity and failures by foreign governments to prevent goods made with forced labor from entering supply chains. In a March 11 notice, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said it would examine whether such practices are “unreasonable or discriminatory” and burden U.S. commerce, with China among the economies named in both probes.
China’s Commerce Ministry, said Washington had no right to make unilateral judgments about whether another country has “overcapacity,” and warned the U.S. action could seriously undermine the international economic and trade order. Beijing said it was assessing the measures and reserved the right to defend its interests.
China’s Foreign Ministry rejected the forced-labor allegations. At a regular press briefing, spokesperson Guo Jiakun said China opposes all forms of unilateral tariff measures and argued that tariff and trade wars serve neither side’s interests. He also called the forced-labor accusation “a lie concocted by the U.S.” and accused Washington of politicizing the issue.
Despite the rhetorical escalation, both sides are moving ahead with face-to-face talks in France, with China’s Commerce Ministry confirming He Lifeng’s visit from March 14 to 17. According to the South China Morning Post, the Paris talks are expected to cover key trade issues and could produce outcomes that pave the way for the next Trump-Xi meeting, underscoring that both governments continue to prepare for dialogue despite broader geopolitical tensions.
Whether the new Section 301 probes will harden positions in Paris or become another bargaining chip remains unclear. For now, they underscore that dialogue and confrontation continue in parallel in U.S.-China relations.
Author: Mariam Simsive
China condemns new U.S. trade probes ahead of Paris talks Read More »
On March 11, the United States launched a new trade investigation under Section 301 concerning China’s industrial overcapacity.
According to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the aim of the investigation is to determine whether the policies and practices of China and 15 other economies related to “structural overcapacity and excess production capacity” are unreasonable or discriminatory and whether they harm U.S. commerce.
Washington said that consultations with the relevant governments will take place as part of the process. Public comments may be submitted until April 15, while hearings will begin on May 5.
The U.S. government made this decision at a time when manufacturers in China’s export hubs were reporting increased activity amid the temporary reduction of U.S. tariffs. In particular, according to Reuters, some factories were trying to make the most of the temporary relief, accelerating both product shipments and expansion plans.
According to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, these investigations are part of the Trump administration’s broader economic policy aimed at strengthening domestic manufacturing capacity and curbing foreign overproduction.
At the same time, this step indicates that despite the temporary easing of tariffs, Washington continues to employ new mechanisms of pressure in its trade confrontation with China.
Author: Mariam Simsive
U.S. Launches New Trade Investigation Against China Read More »
On March 8, China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi outlined Beijing’s diplomatic priorities during a press conference on the sidelines of the annual session of the National People’s Congress, addressing global conflicts, relations with major powers, cooperation with Africa, and the protection of Chinese citizens abroad.
Addressing the escalating conflict involving Iran, Wang called for an immediate halt to military operations and warned against further escalation in the Middle East. He described the war as one that ’’should not have happened’’, emphasizing that armed confrontation would only deepen regional instability.
China urged respect for national sovereignty, opposition to the use of force, and non-interference in the internal affairs of regional countries as key principles for resolving the crisis. According to Wang, civilians must be protected and diplomacy should replace military confrontation.
During a press conference, Wang also highlighted that U.S.-China relations remain a top priority for Beijing. He said maintaining communication between the world’s two largest economies is essential to avoid misunderstandings and global instability. According to Wang, both sides must manage differences carefully and pursue dialogue to maintain constructive engagement.
He also noted that upcoming meetings between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump could focus on stabilizing relations, preserving economic cooperation, and preventing further escalation in global conflicts. Wang framed the talks as ’’vital’’ for both bilateral relations and broader international stability.
Wang also reaffirmed the strength of relations between China and Russia, describing the bilateral partnership as stable despite global tensions. He said the China-Russia strategic partnership reflects a new model of international relations based on equality, respect and mutual benefit.
The two countries have maintained close diplomatic coordination, including a recent phone conversation between Wang and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov discussing international security developments and the situation surrounding Iran.
During the briefing, Wang emphasized that China’s partnership with African countries remains a key pillar of its foreign policy. China plans to deepen economic and cultural ties with the continent, including the introduction of zero tariffs on all tariff lines for African countries starting May 1.
Wang also stressed that protecting Chinese citizens and business interests overseas remains a central task of China’s diplomatic service. He said Beijing will continue improving mechanisms that ensure the safety and support of Chinese nationals working or traveling abroad.
’’Where there is the Chinese flag flying, there are Chinese diplomats on duty’’, Wang said, adding that the government remains committed to assisting citizens wherever they may face difficulties overseas.
By supporting negotiations in global conflicts, deepening cooperation with Russia, and expanding partnerships with African countries, Beijing seeks to increase its role in international politics. However, according to Reuters, China’s diplomatic position often represents a strategic balancing among global powers. Although Beijing emphasizes negotiations and economic cooperation, it simultaneously maintains close partnerships with countries such as Russia, which contributes to the emergence of new geopolitical dynamics in the international security environment.
Author: Mariam Simsive
Wang Yi Talks About International Stability Amid Deepening Cooperation with Russia Read More »
On March 5, during a meeting of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United States took the same position as China and Russia for the first time, declining to support a resolution that warned about nuclear safety risks resulting from attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.
The U.S. interim representative to the agency, Howard Solomon, stated that Washington recognizes the risks created by attacks on Ukraine’s energy system and supports measures aimed at ensuring the safety of nuclear power plants. However, he said the United States could not support a resolution that ’’would not help achieve peace between Ukraine and Russia’’.
China also did not support the resolution. On issues related to the Ukraine conflict, including nuclear safety, Beijing has traditionally emphasized the importance of resolving the conflict through diplomatic means and dialogue.
In particular, representatives of China’s Foreign Ministry stated several times in 2026 that Beijing supports all international efforts aimed at a peaceful resolution of the Ukraine crisis and believes that ’’dialogue and negotiations are the only way to resolve the crisis’’.
According to China’s official position, the safety of nuclear facilities is a shared responsibility of the international community, and actions that could increase nuclear risks or escalate the conflict must be avoided. Beijing also states that it is not a party to the conflict and seeks to maintain what it describes as an ’’objective and impartial position’’.
Thus, it appears that on international platforms, China seeks to maintain a neutral stance, supports negotiations and de-escalation, and rarely directly blames any party in its official statements.
Ultimately, the resolution was adopted by a majority vote. The issue remains especially significant in the context of the ongoing war in Ukraine, as attacks on the country’s energy infrastructure have repeatedly raised concerns about the safety of its nuclear power plants.
According to Reuters, the U.S. decision reflects the diplomatic complexities that currently shape both the convergence and divergence of major powers’ interests within international institutions.
Author: Mariam Simsive
U.S. Sides With China and Russia on UN Nuclear Safety Resolution Read More »









