Civicidea

Fourth webinar on “COVID19: Liberal views and responses worldwide UK / US responses”

On May 6th, the Civic IDEA hosted the fourth webinar on “COVID19: Liberal views and responses worldwide UK / US responses” Webinar speakers were:  Ambassador Tedo Japaridze – Former MP & MFA, Georgia; Ambassador John Herbst- Eurasia Center Director, at Atlantic Council; Lieutenant General Ben Hodges- Former Commander of US Army Europe, Pershing Chair in Strategic Studies at CEPA; Dr. Neil Melvin- Director of International Security Studies at RUSI; Jamie Kirchick- Visiting Fellow in the Center on the United States and Europe, at Brookings; Heather Conley- Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic, at CSIS.

The webinar was moderated by Tinatin Khidasheli, the chairperson of the Civic IDEA.

You can listen to the full discussion on our youtube channel: https://bit.ly/3fUVsaf

Fourth webinar on “COVID19: Liberal views and responses worldwide UK / US responses” Read More »

V Webinar by Civic IDEA, in English COVID 19 – How to live with a big neighbor?

This is V week and we meet again to discuss challenges of COVID-19. This time with the neighbors of Russia.
V Webinar by Civic IDEA, in English
COVID 19 – How to live with a big neighbor?
Please Register on Zoom and join us
May 13, 10:00 AM CET; 12:00 Georgia Time
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_t5rP_DGMQEWHBSHyZciyfw
Webinar in English

V Webinar by Civic IDEA, in English COVID 19 – How to live with a big neighbor? Read More »

The fourth webinar on the challenges of COVID-19. Experts from the US and the UK.

The fourth webinar on the challenges of COVID-19.
Experts from the US and the UK.
IV Webinar by Civic IDEA, in English
COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies: US & UK
register / Register and join us
May 6, 6:00 p.m.
https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_4PrDdXVxRIGczU9k8Hq5BQ
Webinar in English

The fourth webinar on the challenges of COVID-19. Experts from the US and the UK. Read More »

The third webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies: France and Germany; What about China?”

On April 29th, the Civic IDEA hosted the third webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies: France and Germany; What about China?”

Webinar speakers were: Filip Jirous- Sinologist, Researcher at Sinopsis, Prague; Eka Akobia- Dean of School of Governance at Caucasus University, Georgia; Martin Hala- Director of Sinopsis.cz; Didi Kirsten Tatlow- Senior Fellow, German Council of Foreign Relations, Berlin.

The webinar was moderated by Tinatin Khidasheli, the chairperson of the Civic IDEA.

You can listen to the full discussion on our youtube channel: https://bit.ly/3datbui

The third webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies: France and Germany; What about China?” Read More »

The second webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies. Are Russia and China Capitalizing on COVID-19 Crisis?”

On April 22nd, the Civic IDEA hosted the second webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies. Are Russia and China Capitalizing on COVID-19 Crisis?” Webinar speakers were: Giorgi Kanashvili- Senior Policy Advisor at Civic IDEA; Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze- Chair, Parliamentary Committee on Ukraine’s Integration into the EU; Keit Pentus-Rosimannus- Member of Estonian Parliament, Former Estonian MFA; Kerstin Lundgen- Deputy Speaker of the Riksdag; Emil Kirjas- Former Secretary-General of Liberal International; Andrey Pivovarov- Open Russia.

The webinar was moderated by Tinatin Khidasheli, the chairperson of the Civic IDEA.

You can listen to the full discussion on our youtube channel: https://bit.ly/2YBTIwE

The second webinar on “COVID 19 – Responses from Democracies. Are Russia and China Capitalizing on COVID-19 Crisis?” Read More »

Tedo Japaridze: We Should Build On the Relationships We Have Invested In

Exclusive Interview

After the first of a series of webinars dealing with the impact of COVID-19 on Georgia and the wider world, organized by Civic Idea with the assistance of the Friedrich Foundation, GEORGIA TODAY was privileged to speak with Ambassador Tedo Japaridze, a veteran and mainstay of Georgian diplomacy throughout the decades, about these very issues.

We started our interview by asking him what impact he foresees COVID-19 having on the world, security-wise. With both the US and Germany unimpressed by China’s handling of the situation, we note, is there a danger that this will leave the confines of the usual blame-game politics and turn into an open confrontation?

“This public health disaster is developing into a global political and economic crisis, disrupting our social/economic/ cultural/political matrix. And if we need to speak about the new security challenges, we need to begin by reflecting on how a virus with a 1-to-4% death rate has managed to undermine globalization in such a comprehensive manner,” Japaridze answers.

“As a country committed to a so-called ‘western trajectory,’ it is important that we have responded in a specific way: with transparency, with access to information, with rule of law and social responsibility.

Georgia must at this critical point act resolutely and in coordination with our allies: the US authorities, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, but also China. Now is the time for consolidation and coordination and not for squabbles. We, indeed, live in ‘interesting times,’ according to one Chinese metaphor,” he notes.

“I have been somewhat disillusioned by the failure of Western allies to coordinate their response, political and economic. We should not lose heart. True, the COVID-19 crisis has taken away some of the shine of countries we used to regard as ‘models,’ but we should realize that governance requires mistakes. The only mistake that is dangerous is the one we don’t admit and fail to address.

“I praise China for its decisiveness. We have all taken ‘Chinese measures’ when it comes to social distancing: decisive, expensive, but effective. Beijing should also take onboard the lessons learned by countries like South Korea and Germany. Transparency pays! We should all be self-reflective, stay local, be Georgian, Armenian, Azerbaijan, German, American, Chinese, and Singaporean, but also think globally, as COVID-19 does not have a nationality.”

With the US visibly reluctant to assume leadership, and Europe at its most fractious, is there a danger that this power vacuum will be exploited by the Kremlin to try and increase its influence and standing in the near abroad?

Indeed, there are some rough times ahead!

On a global landscape, an economic crisis is unfolding that is already weighing heavily on all countries in the region, including Russia. We started with a supply shock, and we are likely to continue with a demand shock, which is reflected by negative oil futures, for the first time in history. That hurts everybody, but Russia most.

We welcome the signs of cooperation and assistance Russia provided to Italy and even the US! That’s indeed a sign of how a crisis can become an opportunity. However, maintaining “borderization” and kidnapping Georgian citizens on the ABL and finding time for cynical comments on the Richard Lugar Center for Public Health Research in Tbilisi, which has saved the lives of thousands of citizens of Georgia during the pandemic and the international community acknowledged that; to do so, instead of offering something practical, not least a word or two of encouragement in a good-neighborly manner while the crisis unfolds, is just irrational and absurd. So our Western partners should be very much watchful (and they are!!!) that while praising Russians for being a “cooperative partner”, they do not look the other way as Russia pursues her imperial narrative. If the West allows Russia to be confrontational in its “near abroad,” tomorrow it may be the turn of its “middle abroad,” or even its “far abroad.”

With everyone pre-occupied with the virus, is there an increased risk that Russia could use the time for covert activities in Georgia?

I doubt that COVID-19 would change Russian mindsets and I am more than confident that their policy towards the “post-Soviet space” would be the same so-called “negative conditionality”: “either with Russia or against Russia”. And Russia’s problem is not only political or strategic – it’s about their so-called “mental maps” of her Czarist or Soviet legacy, whereas Georgia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Moldova, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, other Central Asian countries have stopped being “post-Soviet republics”. They are truly independent, sovereign countries with their own agenda and priorities, and Russia should accommodate with that reality!

But, in reality, my primary concern is to make sure that we do not look like Russia while this crisis unfolds. I fear the phrase “for security reasons,” especially in an election year. Authorities in different countries, even in the most democratic ones, are using that phrase too frequently for my liking. “Coronavirus autocracy” is a real threat.

Assuming the impact of COVID-19 begins to be seen in Georgia’s breakaway regions, what kind of assistance could / should Tbilisi offer, if any?

The COVID-19 is a global challenge and threat, and consequently, it will, unfortunately, impact our breakaway regions and our citizens there. So, we should extend any assistance necessary and requested.

How do you imagine a post-pandemic Georgia?

Unfortunately, I am not an oracle to predict, but I can reflect, if I may, on the future of Georgia.

The value of Georgia is in its “usefulness;” Georgia’s capacity to localize global opportunity for the region. As I have said many times, the Anaklia Deep-Sea Port is going to be an example of that convergence between the global and the local capacities.

Now, we need to think of the local implications of global threats. And one thing to keep in mind is that a post-pandemic economic recovery will require borrowing, and the emerging reality will test Bretton Woods institutions. The World Bank, the IMF and the UN must rise to the occasion, but may not be able to address the current crisis, especially without firm US backing. That is worrisome. For the Washington consensus to work, we need Washington- and New York-based institutions to work.

That brings us before a new cluster of what Donald Rumsfeld calls “known unknowns” and “unknown unknowns”! We do not know the role of oil over the next two decades and, therefore, our role as a conduit of energy from the Caspian Sea will be reviewed. We do not know what the nature of emerging value chains will be and, therefore, our aspiration to become a trade hub for the Middle corridor for Trans-Eurasian trade will need to be reevaluated.

In sum, Georgia needs to explore its options, holding on to things we can take for granted. I hope and believe that one of the things we can count on is our alliance with the United States, the EU, and Japan.

Beyond our allies, Georgia’s comparative advantage in the region is our record of good and effective governance, even if our politics leave much to be desired. Our role will need to be one of regional facilitators, so we need to quickly study prevailing trends and define our own niche in the emerging new world balances. We should look to build on relationships we have invested in for decades: Washington, Ankara, and Brussels, rather than delude ourselves that we can begin with a clean slate. But we cannot delude ourselves that nothing will change.

By Vazha Tavberidze

link: https://bit.ly/2VYA8ca

Tedo Japaridze: We Should Build On the Relationships We Have Invested In Read More »

The first webinar on the security challenges of the COVID-19 crisis.

On April 15th, the Civic IDEA hosted the first webinar on COVID19 Crisis Security Challenges. Webinar speakers were: Tedo Japaridze, former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Georgia; Edvinas Kerza, Lithuanian Deputy Minister of Defense; Alexandr Vondra, Member of the European Parliament & former Czech Defense Minister; Roman Jakic, former Slovenian Defense Minister and Sebastian Vagt, Head of the Security Hub of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation.

The webinar was moderated by Tinatin Khidasheli, the chairperson of the Civic IDEA.

You can listen to the full discussion on our youtube channel: https://bit.ly/2ze7tqp

The first webinar on the security challenges of the COVID-19 crisis. Read More »

open letter was signed by more than 200 scientists, politicians and civil activists around the world, Civic IDEA is one of them

The Communist Party’s rule by fear endangers Chinese citizens—and the world 共产党依靠恐吓为主的政治统治方式危害中国公民乃全世界

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLew8SS-GpNYv36Ly37g5-Lr5F-_JzX5LiDJw2CDgEgz91BA/viewform?fbclid=IwAR2BvuGaA3_iusp_IEzxushOkXjaxhGc2XIXVApZ32nkKFXoPNz7enpd8mM

open letter was signed by more than 200 scientists, politicians and civil activists around the world, Civic IDEA is one of them Read More »

Text Book examples of information manipulation From the COVID-19 battlefield By Tinatin Khidasheli Published by RFE/RL on March 29, 2020 in Georgian

Checking the COVID-19 map, finding out the numbers of new cases and death toll have become the regular part of the daily routine for all Georgians and undoubtedly, all residents of the world. This is our new reality, the new normal. However, apart from the perfectly comprehensible and ordinary human emotion accompanying these statistics, what do these numbers tell us? What do they show?

The developments surrounding “COVID-19” are exemplary and we get the best experience, not just to better understand and analyze the public healthcare or the crisis response/management systems, and plan a better tomorrow, but also to combat disinformation, more precisely, information manipulation.

If we agree that the world is at war today, we should see that this war, like all other modern wars, is hybrid, where, along with the invisible biological threat, the theater of war is spread across the information space. Each message has its addressee and has a specific task. The goal is far-reaching and strategic:

  • Weaken Democracy!
  • Demonstrate the advantages of one-party, authoritarian rule!
  • Convince the world, that where democracy is powerless, one-man rule with a strong hand is victorious!

Nowadays, we can unequivocally highlight, that the Russian-Chinese misinformation machine is gradually gaining strength and preparing for a deadly attack on liberal democratic rule. The fragmented statements of the democratic world leaders (i.e. US president’s and Washington’s claims about China’s concealment of the information on the complexity and the scale of virus spread), are unable to stop the flood of misinformation operating, using diversified weapons in social networks and popular internet resources.

We must remember!

Every time, when we use the data from pandemic map without the context, without analyzing the dynamics of the spread, the proportion and comparison to the country population, or other characteristics, we become the useful resource for Russian-Chinese disinformation machinery, and involuntarily serve their goals.

Against the general believe, Numbers Do Lie every time we use them unaware of the context and foundation. Statistics becomes the most exemplary and ideal retainer of misinformation if we refuse to analyze and guide with bare numbers.

The simplest example:

What does 25 percent mean? Is it a lot or few? The only thing we can confidently say is that 25 percent is a quarter. And that is it. Everything else is unknown unless we know what is it percentage of, what we compare it to in search of magnitude or scarcity, or where it came from. Such 25, 31, 19 percent are respectively generated daily on the battlefield of COVID-19; they are only intended for our emotional state and exacerbate panic, though in reality the percentage or a plain number says nothing about prevention or development dynamics. However, daily, these statistics create hundreds of information manipulation examples for researchers and other people interested in the field.

Let us follow the events and recall some important facts that are critical to remember while analyzing these events.

Fact #1:

The World Health Organization (WHO) unequivocally states that all data going into their system and then spreading over is based on information provided by states and that there is no standard format to validate it instantly.

In short, the data we check daily, hoping that it will be reduced, downgraded, viruses retreated, and so on, are controlled and provided by states individually. Consequently, it precisely portrays their system and culture of governance.

Fact #2:

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD), applied by the World Health Organization today, was adopted in 1992, and its critics’ main argument for years has been that “in the absence of uniform criteria for diagnostics, coding, and classification” the compatibility and comparability of information provided by states is difficult or almost non-existent.

To put it simply, there is no uniform standard in the field of diagnostics, disease coding or data dissemination / distribution applicable and used by all nations; so accordingly, it is entirely up to the decision of a particular country to document and transmit the scale of the disease to the relevant international organizations, as it fits their national interests.

Once again, in the absence of a unified standard, and the inability to control and check the data provided, compatibility of states’ calculated information is minimal, and the comparison of this data is close to abstract.

Fact #3:

The inability of the WHO to control and monitor provided data is not the only drawback. The other problem is that the main grounds of information dissemination has become the calendar day, which also contributes to information manipulation. For instance, the data from European countries is compared to the data from China on March 29, while we have almost two months delay in spreading and fighting the virus. Precisely because of that difference in time, we face the huge difference and the corresponding reactions concerning the inability of democracies to effectively combat crises.

In short, the comparison of Italy’s march 29 statistics with the Georgian or Chinese data of the same day would be considered as an text book example of information manipulation, since such a comparison of numbers only indicates, how many people are infected or dead that particular day and it has absolutely nothing to do with the dynamics of the spread or the effectiveness / ineffectiveness of prevention or fighting the threat.

Many more imperative facts can be recalled, such as the proportion to the population (as shown in the US example), the tourism factor (best seen in the Italian case), the efficient and dynamic business environment (best seen in the NYC) and others, though based only on these three factors, it is feasible to do an analysis.

Meanwhile we should not forget that in January and early February’20, leading media outlets, citing multiple sources and leaning on the narrations of eyewitnesses, were reporting how the Chinese Communist Party was actively pursuing all whistleblowers and reporters about the virus.

What is an emotional picture we observe today, due to the number juggling and manipulation marathon, ignoring most important factors for analysis: the situation is extremely difficult in Western democracies – in the United States and in the most of the EU states, while authoritarian or so-called “semi-free” countries effectively deal with the threat. This is a daily message we should remember and talk about.

In today’s world, when information is the main weaponry at the battlefield, understanding the truth is never as easy as it might seem on a daily map at the outbreak of a pandemic. In spite of the great human tragedies and the most severe emotional backdrop that has plagued humanity today, we must still strive not to lose common sense and reasoning – the ability to generalize that tomorrow, when the virus becomes the part of the history, we do not surrender our freedom and turn it to a dictatorship or strong-man’s rule. Tinatin Khidasheli is the founder and chairman of the Civic IDEA, the non-governmental organization working on the security issues. One of the main focuses of IDEA’s work is research and monitoring of Russian and Chinese influence operations.

Text Book examples of information manipulation From the COVID-19 battlefield By Tinatin Khidasheli Published by RFE/RL on March 29, 2020 in Georgian Read More »

Scroll to Top